Social influence Flashcards
What is Kelman’s explanation for conformity?
- 3 levels: compliance, identification, internalisation
- Normative Social Influence, desire to be liked, wants to appear normal. Superficial and temporary change in behaviour
- Informational Social Influence, desire to be correct, we look to the majority to see what’s right. Permanent
What does compliance mean?
- Individual agrees externally but keeps personal opinions. A temporary behaviour change to fit in with the group
What does internalisation mean?
Personal opinions genuinely change to match the group. A permanent change due to ISI.
What does identification mean?
Behaviour and private vales change only with the group, as membership is valued
Ash’s theory of variables affecting conformity.
- Groups of 8 to 10 male college students were asked to complete a line judgement task. However, this was a deception. 1 was a participant and everyone else was a confederate. All the confederates purposefully said wrong answers
What was the results of Ash’s theory of variables affecting conformity?
- Overall conformity rates was 32%
- 75% conformed at least once
- One confederate was instructed to give the correct answer, conformity dropped to 5.5%
How does group size effect the levels of conformity?
- Group size less than 6 conformity was low
- 6 and above conformity was around 37%
How does unanimity effect the levels of conformity?
When one confederate said the right answer conformity went from 37% to 5%
How does task difficulty effect the levels of conformity?
When the lines are closer together so the answer is more ambiguous conformity increases
Evaluation of Ash’s compliance research?
- Biased sample, all male, same age group. Beta bias
- Lacks temporal validity
- Ethical issues, not protected from psychological stress
What did Mori and Arai demonstrate?
Ash’s compliance research did not reflect how conformity might occur in real life. They argued that conformity takes place among acquainted persons rather than strangers
What was Sherif’s internalisation research?
Lab experiment with repeated measures. Auto-kinetic effect. Participants were asked to estimate how far the light moved and in what direction. First they were tested alone and asked for their estimate. They were put into a group of 3 people with very different answers.
What were the findings of Sherif’s internalisation research?
When participants answered in a group, they moved their estimates go up or down to be closer to other people’s answers. When asked individually after the group participants still provided an answer similar to the group norm
Evaluation of internalisation research?
- Ambiguous task, lacks internal validity
- Ethical issues, deception
- Temporal validity, can you generalise to modern day
What was Zimbardo’s experiment?
- testing social roles
- 24 male students
- $15 a day
- randomly assigned guard and prisoner
- uniforms
Findings of Zimbardo’s experiment?
- Adopted their roles very quickly
- Guards tormented the prisoners, dehumanised them
- Shut down on day 6
Conclusion of Zimbardo’s experiment?
- They come to identify with the roles
- the riles that people play can shape their behaviour and attitudes, especially if they come to identify with the role
Evaluation of Zimbardo
- Not all the guards behaved in the same way
- All the guards were male, beta bias
- Guards could have been following the instructions rather than adopting role
- Ethical issues
What was Milgram’s experiment?
- 40 male aged between 20 and 50
- pp (teacher) asked cf a question
- if its wrong they get a shock
- Keeps increasing the voltage every time
Findings of Milgram
- all 40 pp continued to 300v and 65% continued to 450v. The closer the pp was to the cf the more likely they were to refuse
Conclusion of Milgram
- Obedience can be evoked in people by situation
- People lower on the social hierarchy are more likely to be obedient to those above
Evaluation of Milgram
- Replicable design
- Control of variables
- Classic study
- Real world application
- Ethical issues, psychological stress
- Lacks external validity
- Lacks internal
What was Hofling study on obediance?
- Fake doctor would ask the nurse to give patients a 20mg dosage when it says maximum 10mg on the bottle.
Breaking multiple hospital rules while doing this
Findings of the Hofling study?
21 out of 22 nurses obeyed