social influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define conformity (2)

A

Changes in individuals behaviour and/or beliefs (1)
as a result of real or imagined group pressure (2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Conformity intro

A

Kelman (1958) suggested that there are 3 ways in which people conform to the opinion of a majority.
These reflect the amount of change that has taken place to a person’s views or actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 3 types of conformity

A

Compliance
Identification
Internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define compliance

A

The most superficial and least permanent change in attitude.
Individuals publicly change their beliefs and behaviours to be in line with a group and to fit in but in probate, revert back to original belief systems and behaviours, when the group pressure stops.
They may not agree with what the group is doing.
Compliance is linked to normative social influence

E.g when a student is at university he smokes because the rest of the group does and he wants to fit, however he doesn’t like smoking and would never do it when he wasn’t with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define identification

A

A stronger type of conformity, involving possible probate as well as public acceptance.
Occurs when individuals look to a group for guidance and adjust their behaviour and belief systems to those of a group membership of the group is desirable and they take in a role within a group.
It involves elements of both compliance and internalisation.

Individual accepts the attitudes and behaviours they are adopting as right (Internalisation) but the purpose of them accepting the attitudes and behaviour is to be accepted as a member of the group (compliance)

When the group is no longer seen as valuable, behaviour may revert back.

E.g a student really wants to be part of a group who listen to drum and bass, so when he is with the group and gene he us alone he listens to drum and bass and really likes music.
However, during the second yesterday of university there is a new group he wants to be apart of who listen to hip hop. He no longer values and listens to drum and bass, he listens to hip- hop.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define internalisation

A

The deepest and most permanent change in attitude.

Individuals publicly and privately change their behaviours and belief systems to go along with a group norm, because we accept their attitudes in to our own cognition ( internalise them), the behaviour lasts when the majority are no longer present.

Internalisation is linked to informational social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Intro of explanations of conformity

A

A 2 process theory, developed by Deutsch and Gerald
It identifies 2 reasons for conformity - informational social influence (desire to be right) and normative social influence (desire to be liked)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the two explanations for conformity

A

Informational social influence
Normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define Informational social influence (3)

A

ISI is driven by the desire to be right (1)
When an individual is unsure (lacks knowledge) about how to behave, they conform by seeking information from the group, about how to behave and assume that it is right, this is a cognitive process (2)
This explanation of conformity leads to internalisation, in which individuals publicly and privately change their views to be in line with a group (3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define normative social influence (3)

A

NSI is driven by the desire to be liked (1)
An individual will ’go along with’ a group’s behaviour in order to avoid ridicule and gain acceptance from them and fit in, an emotional process (2)
This explanation of of conformity leads to compliance, in which individuals publicly change their views to be in line with the group, but privately revert back to their original views (3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who conducted a conformity research

A

Asch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the aim of Asch’s research

A

To investigate the effects of a majority opinion on individual’s judgements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the method for Asch’s study

A

Lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the sample for Asch’s study

A

123 American male students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the procedure for Asch’s study

A

Ppts were individually placed into grouped with 7 to 9 confederates

Were shown two large white cards at a time
On one was a standard line ‘x’ and on the other card were ‘three’ comparison lines ABC
One of the comparison lines was the same length as the standard line, and the other 2 were substantially different

Ppts were asked to say which line (A, B or C) was the same length as standard line X
Ppts were always second or last to answer

On 12/18 trials (critical trials) the confederates gave identical wrong answers
A control group of 36 ppts were individually tested without confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the findings for Asch’s study

A

The real ppts gave a wrong answer 37% of the time when a confederate was present

Post-experiment interviews found that the majority of ppts conformed publicly during the experiment, but not privately (thought that the confederate’s were wrong) as they wanted to avoid ridicule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was the conclusion for Ash’s study

A

This supports NSI as ppts conformed publicly, but not privately (as indicated in the post experiment interviews and the unambiguous nature of the task) in order to be accepted by the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the 3 variables affecting conformity

A

Group size
Unanimity
Task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe the variable group Size

A

Conformity rates increase as the size of a majority group increases however, the size of the group STOPS having an effect on conformity once the group reaches a certain size

When there was 1 real ppt and 1 confederate - conformity was 34%
When there was 2 confederates and 1 real ppt conformity increased to 13%
When there was 3 confederates and 1 real ppt conformity increased to 32%
However, conformity plateaued after this

Suggesting that the size of the majority does have an effect on conformity but only to a point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Describe the variable unanimity

A

Means to be in COMPLETE AGREEMENT from a group of people about an answer or viewpoint

In the original Asch study the confederates all gave the same wrong answer and conformity 37%
However, when Asch carried his study and had 1 confederate give the correct answers throughout the research conformity dropped to 5.5%
Asch then researched a ‘lone confederate’ who gave an answer that was both different from the majority and different to the correct answer - in this variation conformity dropped to 9%

Asch concluded when a dissenter breaks the group’s unanimous position conformity decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Describe the variable task difficulty

A

Conformity increases when the difficulty of a task increases

In one variation of Asch’s research he made the stimulus line more similar in length so that the correct answer was less obvious and therefore the task was harder, when the difficulty of the task increased conformity rates increased
This suggests that informational social influence plays a greater role when the task becomes harder.
When situations are unclear, we are more likely to look to others for guidance

As the right answer becomes less obvious we lose confidence in our ability = more likely to conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define what is meant by conformity to social roles

A

Social roles are the parts that people play as members of various social groups e.g teachers and students.
These are accompanied by expectations that we, and others, have of what is appropriate behaviour in each role.
We internalise these expectations, so they shape our behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

The background information on Zimbardo

A

Prison riots in America and Zimbardo wanted to know why prison guards behaved brutally - was it that they had sarcastic personalities or was it their social role (as prison guard) that caused such behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What was the aim of Zimbardo’s study

A

To investigate how freely people would conform to the roles of guard and prisoners in a role-playing exercise that re-created prison life

25
Q

What was the sample of Zimbardo’s study

A

A volunteer sample of 24 ‘emotionally stable’ US milked university students

26
Q

What was the procedure of Zimbardo’s study

A

Volunteers were randomly allocated each student the role of prisoner or guard

Prisoners - arrested at their homes, taken by prisoners, searched, deloused and dressed in smock uniforms, referred to as numbers rather than by name
Guards - given uniforms, , a ‘night stick’ and mirrored glasses. They were instructed to keep the prisoners under control but use no violence.

Uniforms created a loss of personal identity (de-individuation), encouraging ppts to conform to their social roles

The basement of the psychology department at Stanford university was converted into a mock prison

Prisoners were placed in cells and a regular routine or shifts, meal times etc, was established as well as visiting times , a parole and disciplinary board and a prison chaplain.

Zimbardo took on the role of prison superintendent
If a ‘prisoner’ wanted to leave, they had to go through a parole process

27
Q

What were the findings of Zimbardo’s research

A

Within a day the prisoners rebelled and ripped off their numbers and the guards responded by locking them in their cells and confiscating their blankets

As the experiment continued, the punishments by the guard escalated. Prisoners were humiliated and deprived off sleep by guards conducting head counts

identification was noticeable by the prisoners referring to each other and themselves by their prison numbers instead of their names

The prisoners rapidly became subdued, and depressed, with some showing serious stress related reactions to the experience. Three prisoners were released early due to showing symptoms of psychological disturbance

The role play had been intended to run for 2 weeks, but was called off after just 6 days

28
Q

What was the conclusion for Zimbardo’s study

A

Guards, prisoners and researchers conformed to their role within the prison
Social roles have an extraordinary power over individuals, making even the most well-adjusted capable of extremely brutality towards others.

29
Q

Define the term obedience to authority

A

This is a type of social influence where somebody acts in response to a direct order from a figure with perceived authority.
The person who receives the order may also respond in a way that they would have not done without the order

30
Q

What was the aim for Milgram’s research into obedience

A

To investigate if individuals would obey the orders of authority figure even if this led to negative consequences

31
Q

What was the method of Milgram’s research into obedience

A

Laboratory experiment at Yale university

32
Q

What was the sample of Milgram’s research into obedience

A

40 American males aged 20-50

33
Q

What was the procedure of Milgram’s research into obedience

A

Milgram placed an advert in a newspaper seeking volunteers for an experiment supposedly researching memory on learning and they were paid $4.50

Once the ppt arrived at the univeristy, they wree introduced to another ppt (who was actually a confederate). They drew lots, which were rigged, and the real ppt was assigned the role of the ‘teacher’ and the confederate was the learner

The teachers job was to administrate a learning task and deliver ‘electric shocks’ to the learner in the other room if the learner got a question wrong.

The shocks began at 15 volts and increased in increments of 15 volts to a maximum of 450 volts

The experimenter used prompts if the teacher refused (tested the obedience of authority)

(Only need 2)
‘please continue’
‘the experiment requires that you continue’
‘it is absolutely essential that you continue’
‘you have no other choice. you must go on’

34
Q

What were the findings into Milgram’s research into obedience

A

All ppts went to at least 300 volts, with only 12.5% stopping at that point
65% of ppts continued to the maximum 450 volts, showing high levels of obedience

35
Q

What was the conclusion into Milgram’s research to obedience

A

Ordinary people are obedient to authority when asked to behave in an inhumane way

It is not necessarily evil people who commit evil crimes but ordinary people who are just obeying orders

36
Q

What are the 3 situational variables which affect obedience

A

Proximity
Loaction
Power of uniform

37
Q

Describe proximity and describe a research finding (procedure + finding) in relation to Milgram

A

Proximity - how near or far (close) the ppt (teacher) is to the victim (learner) or experimenter (authourity figure)

P - in Milgram’s original experiment the teacher could not see the learner, only hear them and obedience was
f- 65%. When both the teacher and learner were in the same room obedience fell by 40%. This was because the teacher could directly see how their behaviour was having an unpleasant consequence on the learner

P- Furthermore, when the teacher was required to
F - force the learners hand onto the electric shock plate (touch proximity obedience dropped even further to 30%

P- In on proximity variation (remote instruction) the experimenter left the room and gave instructions to the teacher by telephone
F - in this variation obedience fell to 20.5%, which suggests that, the closer an authority figure is to an individual, the more obedient that individual will be.

38
Q

Describe location and describe a research finding (procedure + finding) in relation to Milgram

A

Location - the original experiment was conducted in a prestigious university (Yale university). Milgram wanted to test what would happen to obedience when the location of the experiment was changed

P - when the location was changed to a run-down office in a run-down part of town
F - obedience fell from 65% at Yale university to 48% in the run down office
Milgram argued that this was because when the experiment was conducted in a run-down office the amount of perceived legitimate authority of the experimenter was reduced.

39
Q

Describe power of uniform and describe a research finding (procedure + finding) in relation to Milgram

A

Power of uniform - the wearing of uniforms can give a perception of added legitimate authority to the individual delivering the orders.

P - In Milgram’s experiment the researcher wore a grey lab coat which gave him an ‘air’ of authority

In one variation of Milgram’s study at the beginning of the study the experimenter in a lab coat was called away from the experiment to answer a phone call. The role of the experimenter was taken away by an ‘ordinary member of the public’ who wore everyday clothes.

F - in this variation obedience dropped to 20%

This suggests that uniform, does act as a strongly visual authority symbol and a cue to act in an obedient manner, and that when not in uniform the perceived legitimate authority of the experimenter was reduced.

40
Q

What are the 2 explanations for obedience

A

Agentic state
Legitimacy of authourity figure

41
Q

Define agentic state (3)

A

This is where people may move from being in a state where they take personal responsibility for their actions - an autonomous state - to a state where they believe they are acting on behalf of an authority figure - agentic state. (1)

This is known as the agentic shift. When an individual is in the agentic state, they lose sense of personal responsibility and they no longer feel guilty for their actions as they seem themselves as carrying out the wishes of a more knowledgeable authority figure (implicit or explicit instruction) (2)

If a person is in the agentic state, they are more likely to obery (3)

42
Q

Define legitimacy of authority figure (3)

A

Obedient individuals accept the power and status of authority figure e.g parents, teachers and police officers, and see them as being in charge (1)

The authority they have is legitimate in the sense that is agreed by society. We accept people’s credentials and believe they know what they are doing (2)

It is ingrained in us to obey these people - even when we believe the order may be un-ethical or unjust. Factors that can affect LOA are uniform and location (3)

Example - this is shown in Milgram’s research as when he changed the experiment and instead conducted his research in a seedy office or gave orders over the telephone, obedience reduced as the experimenter has less legitimate authority.

43
Q

Describe power of uniform and describe a research finding (procedure + finding) in relation to Milgram

A

Power of uniform - the wearing of uniforms can give a perception of added legitimate authority to the individual delivering the orders.

P - In Milgram’s experiment the researcher wore a grey lab coat which gave him an ‘air’ of authority

In one variation of Milgram’s study at the beginning of the study the experimenter in a lab coat was called away from the experiment to answer a phone call. The role of the experimenter was taken away by an ‘ordinary member of the public’ who wore everyday clothes.

F - in this variation obedience dropped to 20%

This suggests that uniform, does act as a strongly visual authority symbol and a cue to act in an obedient manner, and that when not in uniform the perceived legitimate authority of the experimenter was reduced.

44
Q

Describe the dispositional explanation for obedience (6-8 m)

A

Adorno proposed the dispositional explanation (authoritarian personality) as an explanation of obedience

It is an internal explanation for obedience, as the focus is on the idea that certain personality characteristics are associated with higher levels of obedience

The authoritarian personality is a collection of personality traits said to develop from strict parenting during an individual’s childhood e.g extremely strict discipline, an expectation of loyalty,, impossible high standards and severe criticisms of failings

The personality traits include showing extreme respect for perceived authority and submission to people in perceived authority as they are superior. People with an authoritarian personality also disapprove of individuals perceived as low status and direct anger towards them as inferior. They have black and white thinking and strict adherence to social rules and hierarchies

The authoritarian personality was assessed using the F-scale (potential for fascism scale) questionnaire by Adorno on a sample of over 2000 Americans ppts. Those who scored highly on questionnaire had the authoritarian personality and displayed the characteristics described above.

45
Q

Explanations of resistance introduction

A

Although some may conform or obey the demands of authority there are always people who resist pressures to conform or obey

46
Q

What are the two type of explanations of resistance

A

Social support
Locas of control (internal + external)

47
Q

Define social support (3)

A

People can resist pressures to conform or obey when they receive social support. This is because having an ally gives us confidence and support (1)

making it possible to resist the pressure to conform or obey and remain independent in our behaviour (2)

Individuals who have support for their point of view no longer fear being ridiculed, allowing them to avoid normative social influence (3)

48
Q

Define the term locus of control (2)

A

Locus of control is a personality trait which refers to a person’s perception of personal control over their behaviour (1)
There is a locus of control, which internal at one end and external at the other (2)

49
Q

Define internal locus of control (2)

A

Those with an internal locus of control believe they control what happens to them and their behaviour is caused by their own personal decisions and effort (1)
Individuals with a strong internal locus of control are more likely to remain independent in their behaviour and rely less on the opinions of others, which means they are better able to resist social influences (2)

50
Q

Define external locus of control (2)

A

Those with an external locus of control believe that what happens to them is determined by external factors such as the influence of others, luck or fate (1)
Individuals with an external locus take less personal responsibility for their actions and are less likely to remain independent in their behaviour so are less able to resist social influence.

51
Q

Define the term minority influence

A

Minority influence is a form of social influence where members of the majority group change their beliefs or behaviours because of the minority influencing their decision, this usually leads to internalisation. The minority must be consistent, show commitment and be flexible

52
Q

What does minority influence include (CCF)

A

Consistency
Commitment
Flexibility

53
Q

Define consistency

A

If the minority keep repeating the same beliefs to the majority, both over time (diachronic synchrony)
and between all individuals that form the minority (synchronic consistency), the majority then reassess the situation and consider the minority idea more carefully
e.g the same frequent time over the same period

54
Q

Define commitment

A

This suggests the minority must show dedication and make personal sacrifices when facing a majority. Some minorities engage in quite extreme activities to draw attention to their views. If these activities present some risk to the minority, this shows greater commitment. Majority groups may then pay even more attention. This is known as the augmentation principle
e.g sacrificing time for the event, organising and creating resources

55
Q

Define flexibility

A

Too much consistency can be seen as dogmatic and rigid and may stop the majority moving over to the minority viewpoint.
Members of the minority need to be prepared to adapt their point of view and accept the reasonable counter-arguments. The key is to strike a balance
e.g understanding both viewpoints

56
Q

Research on consistency and commitment

A

Was conducted and shown by Moscovici’s study

He conducted on 172 female ppts in a laboratory experiment , were 2 conditions

In condition 1 - a minority group of 2 people inconsistently called blue slides ‘green’ this shows little commitment. This has a little effect on the majority (only 1% changed their minds) the rest continued to call them blue

In the second condition, the minority group called all the blue slides green. In this condition where the minority were consistent and committed, 8% of the majority changed their answers to be in line with the minority

This shows the importance of showing a consistent and committed argument when a minority is trying to influence a majority.

57
Q

Define social change

A

Social change refers to a change in attitudes, behaviours or laws. These aren’t just with individuals but on a large scale, how societies (social norms) have changed.

An historical example of social change is increased rights for women. The suffragette movement in the UK won the campaign for women’s right to vote in the 1920’s

58
Q

Social change (6-8 marks)

A

When a minority has an idea, they must remain consistent (Moscovici et al) by having the same beliefs between members of the group, over a long period of time. They must also show commitment (xie et al) by showing dedication and making personal sacrifices. However, the minority also must be flexible and not completely rigid, by showing compromise if they want to change the majority opinion.

If the minority remain consistent, committed and are flexible they can change the beliefs of the majority publicly and privately (internalisation).

Once a few members of the majority start to move towards the minority begins to gather momentum as more people pay attention until eventually the minority idea eventually becomes a majority idea (snowball effect)

When the majority remembers the minority group the two become separated (social crypto-amnesia)

Social change has occurred, where there is a change in society’s attitudes, behaviours and laws