Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define social influence

A

the process by which individuals and groups change each other’s attitudes and behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define legitimacy of authority

A

an explanation for obedience which suggest we are more likely to obey people who we perceive to have authority over us due to the position of power they hold within the social hierarchy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

identify three features of an authoritarian personality

A

submissive to superiors
dismissive to inferiors
highly prejudiced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

explain how an authoritarian personality develops

A

it develops from having harsh parenting style in childhood. this harsh parenting style consists of strict discipline, criticism of failings and impossibly high standards. as the child cannot express their feelings to their parents so they displace these to other they deem weaker which is known as scapegoating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

which scale measures the authoritarian personality

A

the f scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

give some limitations of the f scale

A

has acquiescence bias- all questions are worded in the same direction
is politically biased- is very right wing, it does not account for left wing authoritarianism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does milgram’s original study tell us about obedience

A

Milgram’s study showed us that people obey those they consider to be authority figures. the results suggest that obeying authority is normal behaviour in hierarchically organised society. we will obey orders that distress us and even go against our moral code

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

outline two situational variable and the impact of these on obedience

A

proximity- describes the physical closeness between the person giving orders and the person receiving it. it decreases obedience rates. in milgram’s variations study when the learner and teacher were in the same room the obedience level decreases to 40% from 65% in the original study, where they were in different rooms
uniform- describes the outfit the person giving the order is wearing. in the original study the experimenter wore a lab coat so was dresses smartly. the experimenter then switched with someone who was dressed in casual clothes. obedience levels dropped from 60% to 20%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

define agentic state

A

this is when individuals obey an order even if they are aware that it is wrong because they feel that they are acting for an authority figure so feel no responsibility for their actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what keeps a person in the agentic state

A

guilt or anxiety about the thought of leaving
not wanting to appear rude or arrogant
unwillingness to break commitment to experimenter
shifting responsibility to victim
denying the impact of their actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

give two explanations why people are able to resist social influence

A

social support- this is when the presence of people helps other resist the pressures of conforming or obeying
locus of control- describes a person’s perception of their behaviours, successes, failures and events. a person with high internal locus control believes they are responsible for their lives so are more likely to resist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the difference between internals and externals

A

internals believe they are responsible for what happens to them and that they direct their own lives whereas externals believe outside forces direct their live and they do not have contr

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the two theories that Deutsch and Gerard proposed to explain conformity

A

normative social influence- when you conform to fit in and to be liked
informative social influence- when you conform due to the need to be right or correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

define identification

A

when you go along with other because you have accepted their point of view and you identify with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

give a limitation of Asch’s conformity study

A

it has been criticised for being a child of its time. the 1950s was a conformists time in America so this could have been the reason for the results. Perrin and Spencer found only one conformity response out 396 trials in a replicate study. this provides evidence that Asch’s results are not consistent with time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

describe the difference between compliance and internalisation

A

compliance is a temporary type of conformity whereby a person goes along with the majority in public but does not agrees with the view in private whereas internalisation is a permanent type where the person accepts the majority view in public and in private

17
Q

list the stages of minority influence

A

draw attention to their beliefs
consistency, commitment, and flexibility shown
deeper processing of the issue in the majority group
augmentation principle
the snowball effect
social cryptomnesia

18
Q

list three characteristic of minorities which make them influential

A

consistency
commitment
flexibility

19
Q

define social cryptomnesia

A

This is part of the process of minority influence which takes place after the snowball effect. It describes how people have a memory that social change has occurred but don’t remember how it happened.

20
Q

define augmentation principle

A

the will to act with consequences or the will not to act due to consequences

21
Q

dispositional explanation

A

any explanation for behaviour that highlights the importance of an individual’s personality