Social Exchange Theory^ Flashcards

1
Q

Theories of Romantic Relationships

A

all theories are examples of economic theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Thibault & Kelly

A

economic theory
considers how parties act out of self-interest and exchange rewards and costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Minimax Principle

A

try to minimise cost and maximise rewards
satisfying and committed relationship is maintain when rewards exceeds costs for both parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rewards, Costs & Profit

A

rewards - cost = relationship satisfaction
rewards/costs are subjective
can vary between people/relationships
can change during a relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Examples of Rewards

A

emotional support
feeling of belonging
quality time
physical affection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Examples Of Cost

A

stress
mental health issues
trust/commitment problems
disloyalty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Comparison Level (CL)

A

amount of rewards you believe you deserve
based on previous relations. and social norms
high CL = worthy relationship
high self-esteem = high CL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Comparison Level for Alternatives

A

compare the rewards/costs from current relations to possible one and being alone
stay in relations. as long as we believe it better than the alternatives
Duck
- CLalt depends on state of current relations
- alternative more attractive if in the current relations. has moer costs than rewards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Stages of Relationship Development

A

Sampling (before)
Bargaining (beginning)
Commitment (short term/honeymoon)
Institutionalisation (long term)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sampling Stage

A

before relationship
explore rewards and cost of social exchange
by experimenting in all relations
or by observing others doing so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bargaining Stage

A

beginning
start exchanging many rewards and cost, negotiating and identifying whats more profitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Commitment Stage

A

short term/ honeymoon
with time the source of rewards/cost become predictable
relations. become more stable with more rewards and less costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Institutionalisation Stage

A

long term
partners are settled because of relations. norms
rewards and costs are established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Research Support

A

Kurdek
investigated importance of SE factors in determining relations. quality
185 different couple types with no kids
questionnaire
More satisfaction associated with the perception of benefits
- alternative has less = less attractive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

VS Research Support

A

all research ignores equity
addressed by equity theory
lots of support for equity in relations.
more important than the balance of rewards and costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Direction of Cause & Effect

A

according to SET, we become disatisfied when relations. is no longer profitable
and alternative are more attractive
Argyle
- argued VS, that we don’t start looking at the rewards/costs until we are dissatisfied
Cost and alternatives are caused by dissatisfaction

17
Q

Vague Concepts

A

Concepts of SET are difficult to quantify
Rewards/costs are superficial
Psy. r/c are more difficult to define
Also vary between people
Comparison levels are problematic
Unclear what the values of CL and CLalt before dissatisfaction

18
Q

Different Relationships

A

Clark & Mills
SET fails to distinguish between types of relationship
Exchange relations (work) involved social exchange
Communal relations. are characterised by giving and receiving gifts without keeping score
If we do keep score then their commitement should be questioned
Low generalisability