social behavior Flashcards
benefits of living in a group
- ↑ access to food
- ↓ vulnerable to predation
- dilution effect: ↑ in # = ↓ in chances of being eaten
- ↑ defense against predators
- ↑ defense against common competitors
- thermoregulation
- maternal care
costs of group living
- ↑ competition for valuable resources (main reason)
- ↑ parasite & disease exposure
- ↑ conspicuousness
social organization
hierarchies:
* linear: A>B>C (clear structure)
* triangular: A>B>C>A
* despotic: A>(B=C=D) ➞ rarer for domestic species/mammals
* dom will make themselves look larger, stronger, fiercer
* sub will show submissive B (mimicking youth; sub dogs/cats act young for food)
coordination
* time (synchronization) and/or space (cohesion): e.g. 4 sows nurse piglets same time and/or place
* leader-follower or collective-decision: e.g. waiting for signal or multiple sheep on pasture stay vigilant and all run together
↑ access to diff better food
- benefit of living in a group
-
better food quality
- get info on food quality from others’
disgust responses & food aversion- humans have facial expressions, chx have gestures
- ex: mouth spitting, bleh-ing, etc
- observational learning in social groups: chx tasting experiment: observer alters behavior after seeing actor have an adverse response to food
- get info on food quality from others’
-
bigger prey
- ex: multiple prides can take down elephant, bull, etc.
- ex: dogs in groups ➞ pheasant hunting
- clumped seasonal sources
↓ vulnerable to predation
- benefit of living in a group
- more eyes = more defenders
- predator avoidance & detection through many eyes hypothesis
- ex: sheep: 1 member stays vigilant for predators: head up using eyes & ears to evaluate risk ➞ benefits for health & safety
-
dilution effect: chance of being caught/affected goes down in larger groups
- ↑ group size = ↓ chance of being eaten
- ↑ group size = ↑ amount of time indiv sheep spends eating
↑ defense against mutual competitors
- benefit of living in a group
- ex: wild horses: polygynous mating system
- compete w/ other males to maintain harem
- 1 sub cannot outfight dom so group of sub males work together ➞ ↑ defense against dom & chances of mating
thermoregulation
- benefit of living in a group
- org maintain stable body temp by balancing heat production & loss
- ex: swine unable to cool themselves by sweating
- wallow in mud, find shade, drink water
- cold: cluster & shiver ➞ lying close together can save energy
- energy going towards keeping warm ➔ using body fat & muscle movement (shivering) to keep warm
- producers loose money b/c:
- time spend not eating
- weight being used for energy
↑ competition for valuable resources
- cost of group living: main reason against
- food, mates, nest sites, resources
- only get a slice of the pie: ↑ group size = ↓ slice
- distribution vs patchiness of resources: ↑ competition for patchy resources
- ex: feeding competition costs to social living in group-housed sows
- maintaining dominance hierarchy through fighting leads to injury, death, & pregnancy loss
- challenge: to learn social living in sows to maintain group housing for better envir ➞ welfare
- sow pen experiment:
- low-ranking sows with no partition (covering/protection) received highest amounts of aggression as opposed to those in fully or partially covered pens
- covering bodies gives protection to lower-ranking sows
- covering bodies gives protection to lower-ranking sows
↑ parasite & disease exposure
- cost of group living
- ↑ indiv in group = ↑ parasites
- social living ↑ parasite load
- ex: large colonies of prairie dogs have more fleas
- stocking rates: human controlled designation of social groups
- ex: chx with ↑ stocking rate showed largest # of parasite eggs
↑ conspicuousness
- cost of group living
- large herds easier to spot by predators
nearest neighbor
- way to measure proximity & sociality
- Social associations using distance criteria with direct and indirect connections
- Direct = animals are labeled as associating if they are next to each other
- Indirect = animals can also be said to associate using the chain rule: Animals A and C are associating because both are next to animal B
- gives little info ➞ no quality
Sociality
how much animals in a group associate with each other and form cooperative societies
* methods of measuring sociality:
1. Proximity
2. Social network analysis
3. Social dominance analysis
bunching behavior
benefits:
1. access shade ➞ thermoregulation
2. avoid insects ➞ ex: flies in cows eyes
Social network analysis
- way of measuring sociality
- look at direct & indirect relationships in social groups
- the degree of sociality in a species depends on the # of indiv interacting
-
sociogram:
- animals = nodes
- association to others = ties/edges
- thickness = degree of association between animals
- arrows = directionality (i.e. who is directing the behavior & who is receiving it
Social dominance analysis
- way of measuring sociality
- maintaining dominance hierarchies through repeated competitions for food, resources, shelter, or mates