Social Flashcards

1
Q

Social Perception

Schemata

Impression Formation

A

cognitive structures that organize past information and experience and provide a framework for processing and understanding new information and experiences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social Perception

central traits

Impression Formation

A

warmth and competence are central traits to descriptions of people that change the perception of the rest of the traits mentioned

Asch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Social Perception

social context

Impression Formation

A

Rosenhan’s pseudopatient study demonstrated the effects of the social context on impression formation.

Once admitted to a mental hospital, the pseudopatients were viewed, especially by hospital staff, as being schizophrenic even though they did not exhibit any abnormal behaviors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Social Perception

fundamental attribution bias

Attributional Biases

A

the tendency for an observer to overestimate dispositional causes and underestimate situational causes when making attributions about an actor’s behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Social Perception

actor-observer effect

Attributional Biases

A

In causal attribution, the tendency for an observer to overestimate the effects of dispositional factors when making attributions about an actor’s behavior but to overestimate the effects of situational factors when making self-attributions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Social Perception

self-serving bias

Attributional Biases

A

refers to the tendency to attribute our own successes to dispositional (internal) factors and failures to situational (external) factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Social Perception

Representativeness

Heuristics

A

basing your judgment of something on how representative/similar it is to the the category (while ignoring base rate data)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Social Perception

Availability

Heuristics

A

predicting an event is more likely to occur if you’re able to recall many examples of its occurence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Social Perception

Simulation

Heuristics

A

predicting something is more likely based on mental simulations/imaginations that it could happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Social Perception

Anchoring and Adjustment

Heuristics

A

initial value (anchor) and then adjusting it up or down from the starting value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Social Perception

Base Rate Fallacy

Cognitive Errors

A

The base rate fallacy is the tendency to underutilize or ignore relevant statistical (base rate) data and to rely, instead, on irrelevant information when making probabilistic judgments about an event or characteristic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social Perception

Confirmation Bias

Cognitive Errors

A

The confirmation bias is the tendency to seek or pay attention to information that confirms one’s hypothesis or current beliefs and to ignore disconfirming information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Social Perception

Illusory Correlation

Cognitive Errors

A

false belief that two characteristics or events are related when they are actually not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Social Perception

False Consensus

Cognitive Errors

A

overestimate similarity of beliefs of others to our own beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social Perception

Gambler’s Fallacy

Cognitive Errors

A

predicting the likelihood of a particular chance event based on occurence of previous events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Social: Interpersonal Relationships

Misery Loves Miserable Company

Affiliation and Attraction

A

Schachter concluded that people like to affiliate most with others who are in similar circumstances (e.g., anxious people prefer to affiliate with other anxious people).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Social: Interpersonal Relationships

Gender Differences

Affiliation and Attraction

A

The research has shown that women generally spend more time than men engaged in conversation, are more likely to talk to people of the same gender, and may affiliate more than men do in public places.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Social: Interpersonal Relationships

Law of Attraction

Affiliation and Attraction

A

According to Byrne’s (1971) law of attraction, we are attracted to others who have similar attitudes because interacting with those individuals is more rewarding than interacting with people who have dissimilar attitudes and is, therefore, more likely to generate positive affect.

Byrne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Social: Interpersonal Relationships

Gain-Loss Effect

Affiliation and Attraction

A

The gain-loss effect predicts that people tend to be most attracted to individuals who show increasing liking for them and to be least attracted to individuals who show decreasing liking for them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Social: Interpersonal Relationships

Attraction in Romantic Relationships/Sexual Jealousy

Close Relationships

A

primary goal for men is to pass on genes, primary goal for women is to secure resources for offspring

Evolutionary Theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Social: Interpersonal Relationships

Emotion-In-Relationships Model

Close Relationships

A

This model of emotion provides an explanation for the experience of strong emotions in close relationships and proposes that there is an innate mechanism that generates emotion in response to unexpected events that disrupt ongoing sequences of behaviors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Social: Interpersonal Relationships

Social Exchange

Maintenance and Dissolution of Friendships

A

Social exchange theory predicts that a person’s decision to leave a relationship depends on the relationship’s costs and rewards - i.e., a person is likely to stay in a relationship when rewards exceed costs but leave when costs are greater than rewards.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Social: Self in Social Context

Self-Schemas/Barnum Effect

Self-Concept

A

The Barnum effect is the tendency to accept vague, general descriptions of oneself (e.g., a horoscope) as accurate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Social: Self in Social Context

Self-Perception Theory

Self-Concept

A

The epinephrine studies supported the predictions of self-perception theory by confirming that, when internal cues are insufficient or difficult to interpret, people acquire information about themselves by observing their external behaviors and/or the context in which those behaviors occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Social: Self in Social Context

Social Comparison

Self-Concept

A

Social comparison theory predicts that people use other (usually similar) people as sources of comparison to evaluate their own attitudes and behaviors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Social: Self in Social Context

Self-verification theory

Self-Concept

A

predicts that people prefer to receive feedback from others that is consistent with their own self-evaluations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Social: Self in Social Context

Self-monitoring

Self-Presentation

A

need and ability to manage impressions that other people form of them

high in self-monitoring concerned with public self

low in self-monitoring concerned with private self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Social: Self in Social Context

Self-handicapping

Self-Presentation

A

engaging in behaviors that will providing an excuse for anticipated failure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Social: Self in Social Context

Self-efficacy

Perceived Self-Control

A

sense of competence and effectiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Social: Self in Social Context

Hardiness

Perceived Self-Control

A

the personality trait of hardiness acts as a protective factor against stress and has three primary characteristics:

  • commitment (a sense of purpose and involvement in one’s relationships and life events);
  • challenge (an openness to new experiences and change); and
  • control (the belief that one has the ability to influence or manage life events).

Kobasa et al. (1982)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Social: Social Influence

Autokinetic Effect

Types of Social Influence

A

stationary point of light appears to move in a darkened room- convergence effect based on the votes of the confederates

Sherif

informational social influence vs normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Social: Social Influence

Compliance with Requests

Types of Social Influence

A

foot-in-the-door
vs.
door-in-the-face

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Social: Social Influence

Obedience to Authority

Types of Social Influence

A

Milgram’s famous and controversial studies evaluated participants’ willingness to obey the direct order or command of a high-status individual (authority) even when doing so seemed to harm another person.

Milgram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Social: Social Influence

minority influence

Responses to Social Influence

A

The research shows that a minority can influence the majority by maintaining a consistent (but not dogmatic) position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Social: Social Influence

psychological reactance

Responses to Social Influence

A

Psychological reactance is the tendency to resist being influenced or manipulated by others, usually by doing the opposite of what is expected or requested.

36
Q

Social: Social Influence

Coercive

Bases of Social Power

A

has control over punishments

37
Q

Social: Social Influence

Reward

Bases of Social Power

A

control over valued rewards and resources

38
Q

Social: Social Influence

Expert

Bases of Social Power

A

has superior ability, skills, knowledge

39
Q

Social: Social Influence

Referent

Bases of Social Power

A

target is attracted to, likes, or identifies with influencing agent

40
Q

Social: Social Influence

Legitimate

Bases of Social Power

A

target believes that influencing agent has legitimate authority

41
Q

Social: Social Influence

Informational

Bases of Social Power

A

possesses specific information needed by target

42
Q

Social: Social Influence

coercive, reward, expert, referent, legitimate, informational

A

bases of social power

43
Q

Social: Attitudes and Attitude Change

Theory of Planned Behavior

Attitudes and Behavior

A

The theory of planned behavior predicts that attitudes are accurate predictors of behavior when the attitude measure assesses all three components of the behavioral intention

  • the person’s attitude toward engaging in the behavior
  • what the person believes other people think he or she should do
  • person’s perceived behavioral control.
44
Q

Social: Attitudes and Attitude Change

Characteristics of the Communicator

Factors that Influence Attitude Change

A

Research on attitude change has confirmed that credible communicators are more persuasive and that one factor that contributes to credibility is trustworthiness (e.g., if the person is arguing against his/her own best interests, the person may seem more trustworthy).

45
Q

Social: Attitudes and Attitude Change

Characteristics of the Communication

Factors that Influence Attitude Change

A
  • the level of discrepancy between the positions of the recipient and the message
  • the order in which the two sides of an argument are presented (primacy/recency effects)
  • whether the message is intentionally delivered or is overheard
46
Q

Social: Attitudes and Attitude Change

Cognitive Dissonance Theory

Theories of Attitude Change

A

cognitive dissonance theory proposes that inconsistencies in cognitions produce discomfort (dissonance) that motivates the individual to reduce the dissonance by changing his/her cognitions.

Festinger

47
Q

Social: Attitudes and Attitude Change

Balance Theory

Theories of Attitude Change

A
48
Q

Social: Attitudes and Attitude Change

Elaboration Likelihood Model

central and peripheral

A

ELM is a cognitive theory of attitude change that distinguishes between two information processing routes - central and peripheral.

Use of the central route is likely when the

49
Q

Social: Attitudes and Attitude Change

central method

ELM

A
  • listener’s motivation is high,
  • the listener has the ability to process the information contained in the message
  • the listener is in a neutral or slightly negative mood.
50
Q

Social: Attitudes and Attitude Change

peripheral method

ELM

A
  • listener is unmotivated
  • listener lacks the ability to process the information
  • the listener is in a positive mood.
51
Q

Social: Attitudes and Attitude Change

Social Judgment Theory

Theories of Attitude Change

A

Social judgment theory predicts that people have three “categories of judgment” by which they evaluate persuasive messages:

  • a latitude of acceptance,
  • a latitude of non-commitment, and
  • a latitude of rejection

people are most likely to be persuaded when the message is within their latitude of acceptance.

52
Q

Social: Attitudes and Attitude Change

Attitude Inoculation

Resistance to Persuasion

A

inoculated partcipants were more likely to resist persuasion

53
Q

Social: Aggression

Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis

Theories of Aggression

A

This hypothesis proposes that aggression is motivated by frustration, and a revised version predicts that frustration leads to aggression in the presence of aggressive cues.

54
Q

Social: Aggression

Social Learning Theory

Theories of Aggression

A

Social learning theory predicts that learning can occur simply by observing the behavior of a model. It has been used to explain the acquisition of aggressive behaviors (e.g., the effects of media violence).

55
Q

Social: Aggression

Effects of Media Violence

Theories of Aggression

A

The research has generally confirmed that viewing media violence increases aggression by providing viewers with models for aggressive behavior. In addition, media violence can affect attitudes as well as behavior - e.g., frequent viewing of media violence has been linked to a tendency to overestimate the likelihood that one will be a victim of violence.

56
Q

Social: Aggression

Effects of Pornography

Theories of Aggression

A

Studies investigating the effects of pornography have shown that, while exposure to mild erotica may reduce aggressiveness, exposure to pornography with violent themes tends to increase aggressive behaviors toward women as well as increase acceptance of rape myths and the adoption of callous attitudes toward sexual violence

57
Q

Social: Aggression

Deindividuation

Factors that Affect Aggression

A

Deindividuation is a state of relative anonymity that allows an individual to feel unidentifiable. It has been associated with increases in antisocial behavior, apparently because the deindividuated person’s behavior is no longer controlled by guilt, fear of evaluation, or other inhibitory controls.

58
Q

Social: Aggression

Social Roles/Prison Study

Factors that Affect Aggression

A

Zimbardo’s prison simulation study demonstrated that people alter their behaviors to fit their assigned roles.

59
Q

Social: Aggression

Catharsis

Factors that Affect Aggression

A

The catharsis hypothesis predicts that an act of aggression reduces an individual’s arousal level which then decreases the likelihood that he/she will act aggressively again in the near future. The research has not been supportive of this claim.

60
Q

Social: Prejudice

Authoritarian Personality

Causes of Prejudice

A

political extremism are the outcome of an authoritarian personality: rigidity, cynicism, committment to conventional values, intolerance of ambiguity

61
Q

Social: Prejudice

Intergroup Conflict

Causes of Prejudice

A

Superordinate goals can be achieved only when individuals or members of different groups work together cooperatively and have been found useful for reducing intergroup conflict.

62
Q

Social: Prejudice

Group Identity

Causes of Prejudice

A

group identity is an important part of a person’s self-concept, people want to maintain a positive group identity

Tajfel and Turner

63
Q

Social: Prejudice

Levels of Racism

Racism

A

Several investigators argue, to understand the effects of racism, it is necessary to recognize that it operates on multiple levels. These levels may be categorized as cultural, institutional, interpersonal, and internalized.

64
Q

Social: Prejudice

Symbolic Racism

Racism

A

racism has gradually taken the place of “old-fashioned” racism and that symbolic racists believe that African Americans and other minorities violate such traditional American values as individualism, self-reliance, and the work ethic. They also deny their prejudice and attribute the social and economic problems of minority group members to internal factors (e.g., a lack of effort and discipline).

Sears et al.

65
Q

Social: Prejudice

Legislation

Methods for Reducing Prejudice

A

the state needs to legislate out racism before people actually change

66
Q

Social: Prejudice

Intergroup Contact

Methods for Reducing Prejudice

A

The contact hypothesis proposes that prejudice may be reduced through contact between members of majority and minority groups as long as the following conditions are met: Members of the different groups have equal status and power, members are provided with opportunities that disconfirm negative stereotypes about members of the other group, and intergroup cooperation is necessary to achieve mutual (superordinate) goals.

67
Q

Social: Prosocial Behavior

Evolutionary Theory

Origins of Prosocial Behavior

A

kin altruism: people will give to their own group even if it is sacrificial to the self

68
Q

Social: Prosocial Behavior

Social Norms

Origins of Prosocial Behavior

A

norm of reciprocity vs norm of social reciprocity (helping people whether or not they’ve helped us)

69
Q

Social: Prosocial Behavior

Robber’s Cave

Types of Prosocial Behavior

A

Sherif’s research with boys at a summer camp demonstrated that the most effective way to reduce intergroup hostility is having the members of the groups cooperate to achieve a mutual (superordinate) goal.

70
Q

Social: Prosocial Behavior

Jigsaw Method

Types of Prosocial Behavior

A

The jigsaw method is a method of learning in which assignments must be completed by teams with each team member being assigned a different piece of the project. It has been found to improve intergroup relations, cooperation, and self-esteem as well as academic achievement, especially for members of minority groups.

71
Q

Social: Prosocial Behavior

Bystander Intervention/Apathy

Types of Prosocial Behavior

A

Bystander apathy refers to the tendency of people to not intervene in emergency situations when others are present. It has been attributed to three factors: social comparison, evaluation apprehension, and diffusion of responsibility.

72
Q

Social: The Social Environment

Lewin’s Field Theory

Field Theory

A

Lewin’s field theory describes human behavior as being a product of interdependent factors in the person and his or her physical and social environment.

73
Q

Social: The Social Environment

Types of Intraindividual Conflict

Field Theory

A

Lewin (1931) and Miller (1944) distinguished between four intraindividual (motivational) conflicts:

  • approach-approach
  • avoidance-avoidance
  • approach-avoidance
  • double approach-avoidance

Of these, the double approach-avoidance (which occurs when we have to choose between two goals that both have positive and negative qualities) is the most difficult type to resolve.

74
Q

Social: The Social Environment

Zeigarnik Effect

Field Theory

A

The Zeigarnik effect is the tendency to remember interrupted and unfinished tasks better than completed ones, especially in non-stressful situations.

75
Q

Social: The Social Environment

Effects of the Ambient Environment

Air Pollution/High Temp/Noise

A

air pollution: decreased cognitive performance
high temp: frustration, aggressiveness
Noxious/Excessive Noise: stress and irritability, reduced when they believe they can control it

76
Q

Social: The Social Environment

Effects of Crowding

Environmental Effects on Behavior

A

Crowded conditions tend to enhance positive experiences and increase the unpleasantness of negative experiences.

Men seem to be more stressed by crowded conditions than women and are more likely to react with increased aggressiveness, apparently because men require more personal space.

77
Q
  • approach-approach
  • avoidance-avoidance
  • approach-avoidance
  • double approach-avoidance
A
78
Q
  • approach-avoidance
A
79
Q

double approach-avoidance

A
80
Q
A

Equity theory predicts that motivation (e.g., motivation to remain in a relationship) is affected by a comparison of the input/outcome ratios of oneself and one’s partner.

81
Q

overjustification hypothesis

A

predicts that, when people are externally rewarded for a task they previously found intrinsically interesting, their intrinsic interest in the task will decrease.

82
Q

Social: The Social Environment

approach-avoidance

Types of Intraindividual Conflict

A

when a single goal has both positive and negative qualities

82
Q

Social: Interpersonal Relationships

Equity Theory

Maintenance and Dissolution of Friendships

A

Equity theory predicts that motivation (e.g., motivation to remain in a relationship) is affected by a comparison of the input/outcome ratios of oneself and one’s partner.

82
Q

Social: The Social Environment

avoidance-avoidance

Types of Intraindividual Conflict

A

two equally unattractive goals, leads to indecision

82
Q

Social: The Social Environment

double approach-avoidance

Types of Intraindividual Conflict

A

choosing between two things that both have good and bad

82
Q

Social: Self in Social Context

overjustification hypothesis

Self-Concept

A

predicts that, when people are externally rewarded for a task they previously found intrinsically interesting, their intrinsic interest in the task will decrease.