Skill acquisition - Theories of arousal Flashcards
Drive theory (1952) description
-There is a linear relationship between arousal and performance. As arousal increases, performance increases
-Dominant response is more likely as arousal increases
(dominant response=preferred motor programmes and learned behaviour)
Drive theory calculation
Personality= Function of (habit x drive) P=f (HxD)
-However, drive theory is subject to drive reduction where performance may deteriorate as a result of motivational losses
Drive Theory
draw it out
Drive Theory Strengths and weaknesses
Strengths
-Shows clearly the linear relationship between arousal level and performance quality
Weaknesses
-Doesn’t give any indication of the consequences of over arousal, and also implies that a person’s performance and arousal have no limitations because the graph shows that both just continue to increase
Inverted U theory description
- Inverted U theory states that performance increases with arousal until it reaches an optimum point at a medium level of arousal
- Any further increases to arousal will result in a decline in performance
Inverted U Theory
draw it out
Inverted U Theory strengths and weaknesses
Strengths
-Indicates clearly the relationship between arousal levels and performance quality
Weaknesses
-It is very unlikely that performance decreases in a smooth declining arc, it is more likely that over arousal leads to a vertical plummet
Modified Inverted U Theory description
Task, skill and personality
- It recognises that optimum levels of arousal are not the same for all activities or all performers as the inverted U can shift
- It suggests complex or fine skills are best with low arousal, whereas simple or gross skills are best with high arousal
- Extroverts cope with higher arousal and introverts cannot cope with higher arousal
Modified Inverted U Theory
-performance level
Optimum performance and phase of learning;
- Autonomous learners= higher arousal
- Cognitive learners= lower arousal
Modified Inverted U Theory
draw it out
Modified Inverted U Theory strengths and weaknesses
Strengths
-It recognises that optimum levels of arousal are not the same for all activities and describes how the Inverted U can shift
Weaknesses
-Critics observe and question if arousal always occurs at the midway-point of the shift
Catastrophe Theory description
- As (somatic) arousal increases, performance increases up to an optimum or midway point. If arousal continues to increase or is too high, there is a sudden or extreme decline in performance
- If high cognitive arousal/anxiety confides with or interacts with high somatic anxiety, it causes loss of control/ co-ordination/concentration or decision making skills
Catastrophe theory
draw it out
Catastrophe Theory strengths and weaknesses
Strengths
-Being aware of the findings from the graph is important for coaches to prevent their athletes from a sudden drop in performance that can occur from high arousal
Weaknesses
-Not all performers will have a dramatic/sudden decline in performance when over aroused
Peak Flow description
Peak flow= When optimum performance levels are achieved and is associated with an emotional response
- When you are ‘in the zone’ and nothing can go wrong
- Related to the amount of inner drive and motivation
- Performance is fluent and effortless