Sexual Violation Flashcards

1
Q

What needs to be proved?

A

Crown must prove beyond reasonable doubt:

  • Intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant, and
  • complainant did not consent to the sexual act, and
  • offender did not believe the complainant was consenting, or
  • offender did believe the complainant was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable.

Therefore any investigation must prove:

  • offender knew they did not have victim’s consent but acted anyway (offender’s mens rea)
  • the offender’s grounds for believing in the consent were unreasonable.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

No Legal Spouse Defence

A

Spouse who sexually violates their spouse has no legal defence due to the couple are legally married.
Sec. 128(4), Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

No presumption because of age

A

There is no presumption of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of his or her age.
Sec. 127, Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What makes sexual connection unlawful?

A

Consent:

  • Subjective Test
  • Subjective Test
  • Objective Test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reluctant Consent

A

Court held true consent can be given reluctantly or hesitantly and may be regretted afterwards. Unless it is provided without fear of, application of, threatening of force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Clarke

A

Rape of 16 year old female:

  • Offender affected by alcohol
  • Argued what may appear to be unreasonable to sober person may not be to drunk person
  • Court rejected argument. Term reasonable should not be interpreted as reasonable as offender believed to be.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Recklessness as to Consent

A

Recklessness is not consistent with reasonable belief in consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Consent: Lack of Protest or Resistance

A

Does not mean person is consenting. What is relevant is the complainant’s state of mind.

However it is relevant as to whether the defendant belief in consent, and whether the belief was reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consent: Asleep on Unconscious

A

Even prior agreement does not constitute consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Consent: Affected by Alcohol or Drugs

A

Consent is not invalid simply because the person is intoxicated. The question is whether the person is so affected (level) they cannot understand the situation and give rational & reasoned consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consent: Intellectual, Mental, Physical Impairment

A

The issue is whether the impairment is severe enough to affect the complainant’s capacity to give consent.

Alternative charge: Sec. 138, Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Consent: Mistaken Identity

A

Note: the mistake is one made by the complainant submitting to sexual activity and not the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Consent: Mistaken as to Nature and Quality of Act

A

Consent: If they agree/aware the act is intercourse, they are not mistaken.
Consent: If they agree to an act other than intercourse and intercourse takes place, they have not given their genuine consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sec. 129(1), Crimes Act 1961

A

Attempted Sexual Violation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Harpur

A

The courts may view the defendant’s conduct cumulatively, up to when the conduct in question stops, and consider the the conduct as the entirety. Whether it is sufficiently proximate is always relevant, but not definitive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sec. 129(2), Crimes Act 1961

A

Assault with Intent to Commit Sexual Violation:

Two Intents

  • Assault in hope to change victim’s mind
  • Assault intending to commit rape regardless of whether victim changes mind.
17
Q

Sec. 128B, Crimes Act 1961

A

(1) Sexual violation liable to 20 years Imprisonment
(2) Convict must be sentenced imprisonment unless court thinks person should not be. (3) as guide.
(3)
(a) particular circumstances of person convicted
(b) particular circumstances of the offence.