sexual selection Flashcards
lecture 19 - Mari Knight
Bateman’s principle
male fitness is limited by the number of mate obtained ( so males fight )
females fitness is limited by offspring quality
( so females choosy )
in most species, variability in reproductive success is greater in males than in females
parental investment
any investement by the parent in aindividual offspring that increases the offsprings chance of surviving at the expense of future offspring
parental investment theory : Trivers, 1972
the sex which exhibits less parental investment ( not necessarily male ) will have to compete to mate with the opposite sex
in species where both sexes invest heavily they should be mutually choosy
intra-sexual selection
members of the same sex compete for mates
e.g southern elephant seal
inter-sexual selection
where members of one sex ( usually female ) choose members of the opposite sex
selection of the mate is dependent on their ‘attractiveness’
direct phenotypic benefits
choosy individuals receive direct benefits from their mates
- food, breeding territory, parental care, ect.
e. g male damselfish defent territories
- females choose mates on the basis of their terriotory and e.g size
- female choice influences egg survival
spermatophores
male reproductive structures that package sperm cells to aid in their transmission to females during mating in a variety of invertebrate animals
sensory bias
female mating preferences may be by-products of selection on sensory systems
(males evolve traits that exploit these biases)
e.g Xiphophorus swordtails (and relatives)
- swordlessness is the primitive state (ancestoral state)
- female platyfish prefer conspecific males
with artifical sword
- a pre-existing bias for swords
Fisherian runaway selection
Fisher (1930) : male ornamentation is the result of female preference for males with the most exaggereated ornaments
- initial female presence is arbitary
- strong female choice for the male
ornament results in runaway sexual
selection, leading to the further
exaggeration of the trait - preference for the trait (in females)
becomes genetically linked to the
expression of the trait (in males) - continues until the costs imposed by
natural selection balance the benefits of
sexual selection
sexy son hypothesis
assumes an indirect benefit to female choice due to the attractiveness of their sons
females that mate with an attractive male will produce attractive sons
- their fitness will be increased as a result
of their sons’ higher mating success
( closely related to the Fisherian runaway selection )
indicator traits : handicaps
the handicap principle : reliable signals must be costly to the signaller
- only high quality individuals can afford the cost of the signal
if signals are cheap, all individuals can display them, so they provide no information to the receiver
Hamilton-Zuk hypothesis (1982)
a special case of the handicap principle
sexual ornaments are indicators specifically of parasite and disease
e.g intestinal nematoads adversly affect male secondary sexual characters
runaway selection vs handicap principle
runaway :
• genes for attracting females only
• signal and prefernce for signal become linked
• no positive relationship between signal and genetic quality
•signal negatively or uncorrelated with condition
handicap principle :
• genes for survival/reproduction, not just attractivness
• not necessary for signal and prefernce to be linked
• signal positevly associated with genetic quality
• signal may be positively associated with condition
lek
aggregation of male animals gathered to engage in competitive displays and courtship rituals
the lek paradox
- strong skew in male reproductive success
- a few generations of mating should elimante most genetic variation
- yet females remain choosy