Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Law > Sexual Offences > Flashcards

Sexual Offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

Olugboja 1982

A

PRIOR TO 2003

Submitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Papadimitropoulous 1957

A

PRIOR TO 2003

Inducing causes cannot destroy consent once formed (believed married)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Linekar 1995

A

PRIOR TO 2003

Not pay prostitute - not deceived as to nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DPP v Morgan 1976

Overturned by SOA 2003 - subjective

A

PRIOR TO 2003
Sex with wife even if apparently resists
No reasonable belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tabassum 2000

A

PRIOR TO 2003
Breast exam
Changed nature - not medical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Elbekkay 1995

A

PRIOR TO 2003

No active impersonation but still rape under general meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v A 2001

A

PRIOR TO 2003

Youth Justice Act - exclude previous sexual relationship - HRA?? - admit where so relevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bingham 2013

A

PURPOSE AND NATURE (s76)
False identity - send nudes - threat
purpose = sexual gratification

CONSENT (s74)
Blackmail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Devonald 2008

A

PURPOSE AND NATURE (s76)
Daughter’s ex - post
Purpose = more than sexual gratification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Assange 2011

A

CONSENT (s74)
Condom condition
S74 decesive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R(F) v DPP 2013

A

CONSENT (s74)
Without ejaculation
???

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bree 2007

A

CONSENT (s74)
Drunken consent still consent
Fact specific; temporary loss of capacity = no consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v B 2007

A

CONSENT (s74)

HIV - consent but no defence to harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Jheeta 2007

A

CONSENT (s74)
Police - keep dating
No consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Dougal 2005

A

CONSENT (s74)

Too drunk to remember - renounce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v G 2008

A

CONSENT (s74)

She said she was 15 - child under 13 - must have sufficient capacity

17
Q

Kirk 2008

A

CONSENT (s74)

Run Away - sex for money no consent

18
Q

McNally 2013

A

CONSENT (s74)
Believing she was a boy
Deception - common sense

19
Q

Cicarelli 2011

A

REASONABLE BELIEF (s75)
Early on seemed to consent
No evidence here

20
Q

Sexual Offences Act 2003

A

1: Rape
2: Assault by Penetration
3: Sexual Assault
4: Causing person to engage in sexual behav. without consent

78: Sexual
74: Consent
76: Conclusive Presumptions
75: Evidential Presumption

Criminal Law (12 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions