OAP Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Smith v Superintendent of Working Police Station 1983

A

ASSAULT

Looking through window - no intention of carrying out threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Burstow, Ireland 1997

A

ASSAULT
Silent phone calls
Intended to cause fear + so understood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fagan v MPC 1968

A

BATTERY

Positive Act - initial act of touching through car

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DPP v K 1990

A

BATTERY

Acid hand dryer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire 2000

A

BATTERY

Struck mother holding baby - battery to baby - no matter technique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DPP v Santana Bermudez 2004

A

BATTERY

Needle - reckless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Venna 1976

A

COMMON ASSAULT - MENS REA
Police - mistake, fracture hand when kicking another officer’s foot
Cunningham recklessness - foresight of physical contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Savage, Parmenter 1991

A

s47 - ASSAULT ABH - MR
Beer Glass - dismissed
Played with son - allowed
Cunningham - intended or foresaw - no need to foresee gravity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Roberts 1971

A

s47 - ASSAULT ABH - AR

Jump car - indecent proposals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Chan-Fook 1994

A

s47 - ASSAULT ABH - AR
Psychiatric injury - question suspect
Bodily - includes nervous system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v DPP 2003

A

s47 - ASSAULT ABH - AR

Physical pain not necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DPP v Smith 2006

A

s47 - ASSAULT ABH - AR

Pony Tail - intrinsic; concerned with the body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

JCC v Eisenhower 1983

A

s20 - WOUNDING

Break in the continuity of the whole of the skin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Martin 1881

A

s20 - INFLICTING
Fire exit
No need for direct application of force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Burstow 1997

A

s20 - INFLICTING
Cause and inflict - no radical divergence
Psychological conditions can be inflicted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Dica 2004

A

s20 - INFLICTING
HIV - GBH?
Consent - no defence under s18 but defence under s20

17
Q

Konzani 2005

A

s20 - INFLICTING
HIV - GBH?
Recklessly

18
Q

Golding 2014

A

s20 - INFLICTING

Herpes virus - Dica applied

19
Q

Bollom 2004

A

s20 - GBH

Impact on particular victim

20
Q

Mowatt 1968

A

s20 - MR

Foreseeing some harm, not gravity

21
Q

Brady 2007

A

s20 - MR

Recklessness - objective

22
Q

R v Morrison

A

s18 - GBH + Intent
Cunningham - subjective
Police - broken window

23
Q

DPP v Pal 2000

A

RR Aggravated Assault

Anger at having to leave centre

24
Q

White 2001

A

RR Aggravated Assault
African = black
Doubt S American

25
Q

DPP v McFarlane 2002

A

RR Aggravated Assault

Jungle Bunny + Black Bastard - wrong to acquit because trigger was parking

26
Q

AG Ref No 4 2004

A

RR Aggravated Assault

Immigrant Doctor

27
Q

Rogers 2007

A

RR Aggravated Assault

Bloody Foreigners - not technical term

28
Q

Cockburn 2008

A

MANTRAP

29
Q

Criminal Justice Act 1988 s39

A

Common Assault and Battery

30
Q

OAPA 1861

A

s47: Assault + ABH
s20: Wounding + GBH
s18: GBH + Intent

s31: mantrap

31
Q

Crime and Disorder Act 1998

A

s28: racially or religiously aggravated

32
Q

UK Borders Act 2007 s22

A

Assaulting immigration officer