Sex and Technology Flashcards
What does Erin call “sex + tech”? what are the three kinds?
Technology-Mediated Sexual Activity
- Non-arousal TMSA
- Solitary-arousal TMSA
- Partnered-arousal TMSA
What is non-arousal TMSA? What is it comprised of?
not focused on sexually stimulating materials/immediate gratification
it is comprised of
- seeking sexual information (searching)
- seeking potential sexual interactions (online dating)
What are two possible sources of sexual information online?
- professional/evidence-driven sources (ex: planned parenthood)
- user-generated sources (ex: tiktok, Instagram)
- getting the info more passively, not seeking out the info
What are the pros and cons of seeking sexual information?
Pros:
- affordable
- accessible
- anonymous/private
- fast
Cons:
- unwanted information
- misleading/false information
- social media is a big problem here, anyone can claim to be a professional and we are not likely to fact-check when passively finding it
What is an example of false/ misleading sexual health information online?
Misinformation about pornography:
- there is a lot of info out there about it being bad
- many people say that people are addicted to porn (trend to do no nut November to stop this “addiction”)
- porn is not classified as “addictive” under the DSM
@beaupinto: “Porn is the biggest drug addiction on the planet, because when you see an attractive woman, the alpha part of your brain releases a neurotransmitter called dopamine”
- There is no alpha part of the brain and dopamine is a broad thing that we release when experiencing pleasure as a whole
Can porn be a source of misinformation?
Yes!
- We see an association/correlation between watching pornography and particular myths about what sex is like
Myth example: one thing that women really like is a sudden unannounced switch to anal sex
This correlation doesn’t prove causation, but some research has led us in the direction of it
ex: A porn literacy program was found to improve adolescents’ knowledge about porn-related misinformation, participants were less likely to endorse misinformation and had improved factual knowledge of sexual activity
How are the “pros” of seeking out sexual information relevant for marginalized people (LGBTQ+)?
Compared to their counterparts, they search for sexual help and related info online even more, particularly because info that would be relevant to that population is regularly excluded from our traditional sex education
- finding info online can be good for them if not misinformation
- Social media = source of identity affirmation (provides a positive source of a community)
- during COVID social media allowed them to discover their LGBTQ+ identity, and connect with other LGBTQ+ people
Seeking sexual partners - a history of online dating in the early years:
1940-2010
- hetero couples main way of meeting was through friends and bars/restaurants then that began to drop
- before 1997 online meetings were not common because the internet didn’t exist
- rise of online meeting around early 2000’s
ex: happy families planning service (not rly online - 1959), match.com (1995), okcupid+ plenty of fish (2002-2003)
1997-2010: difference between hetero and same sex couples meeting online
20% of heter couples were meeting online when 70% of same-sex couples were meeting online
platforms that cam out during this time:
- gaydar & planet romeo (1999-2002)
- grindr & scruff (2009-2010)
what was online dating like between 2010-2020?
around 2010, 20% became 40% for hetero couples meeting online (became more popular in 2010’s)
- tinder - 2012
- hinge - 2012
- bumble - 2014
app-based platforms make it so easy for people to carry around their potential partners in their pockets
What is a changing trend seen for online dating now? why do we think?
The data stops at 2020, but as of 2023 online dating apps are most popular among millennials (60%) and less among GenX and GenZ
Reason:
worry about rejection has caused over half (56%) of GenZ hinge daters to miss out on their chance with someone (decide not to meet up with someone)
Why is there an increase in millennials’ use of dating apps?
- less stigma around it
- it’s convenient
- instant gratification:
- get a hit of dopamine when you match with
someone and get that notification that
someone is interested in you - 44% of millennials say they use Tinder for a
confidence- boost (people aren’t using
it for dating or sex, they use it for self-esteem
boost)
- get a hit of dopamine when you match with
Gamification and ghosting
gamifying the dating process (scoring points, competing, rules)
- matching with someone is like scoring a point
ghosting is when one person suddenly ignores or stops communicating with another person, without telling them why
A study found that Participants rated ghosting as “morally acceptable” when the relationship was shorter and lower intensity (like a relationship on a dating app)
- gamifying makes it a lot easier to ghost - if you see people as a point to be scored it dehumanizes people!
What might be a large reason to continue ghosting?
In a study, 70% of women and 20% of men received a disproportionately aggressive response after letting someone down
wanting to avoid that by ghosting
Paradox of online dating that we see:
rise of online dating = increase of ingle people and decrease in sexual activity… how does that make sense if its easier than ever to find a partner?