scxhoolig Flashcards
Education’s sociological significance
- Schooling as socialization (conformism, cohesion, but also
preparing for a job) - Schooling as reproduction (inequality in opportunities, schools
confirm unequal starting positions of pupils rather than
compensate for these) - Schooling as emancipatory institute (meritocracy rewards the
most talented and allows for intergenerational social mobility) - Schooling as producer of values (belief in science / rationality /
personal freedoms, critical thinking, but also religious schools)
The conflict perspective
- Apart from teaching relevant skills for future jobs, schools
also help shape the personalities of future workers - Schools are a micro-cosmos where social hierarchies are
reproduced - Future blue-collar workers are taught obedience
- Future white-collar workers are thought critical thinking, autonomy
- This is part of schools’ hidden curriculum; the stuff they ‘teach’
implicitly, like obedience, acceptance of hierarchy, manners… - Instead of fostering emancipation, schools may contribute to
reproduction of social hierarchies
hidden curriculum
implies that characteristics of
pupils unrelated to intelligence or effort may play a
role in how they are evaluated at school
Basil Bernstein (pp 644-645): social class
background affects whether pupils use a restricted or
an elaborate speech code, which affects how
teachers judge them
* Cultural proximity to the academic culture at school
matters a lot for educational succes
Cultural Homology:
social structures or class distinctions.
Bourdieu and reproduction
Kids enter school with a certain habitus
* This habitus may fit with the school’s culture and
expectations (like with many middle-class kids who
were subject to concerted cultivation) or it may not (like
with Willis’ lads)
* This gives some kids a head start while putting others
at a disadvantage
* Since schools cannot make up for these initial cultural
differences, reproduction is likely to happen
School transforms social privileges into ‘personal merit’
(we might call this a social ‘money laundering operation’
Middle-class kids are better at interacting with
teachers in ways that benefit them
Reproduction of gender divisions
Like lower-class boys or ethnic minority kids, girls
have long been subject to unhelpful stereotypes in school
* Lower teacher expectations tended to become self-fulfilling prophesies
* This is often a vicious circle: lower expectations -> lower confidence among
girls -> lower achievements -> confirmation of low expectations -> ….
* Gender stereotypes and sexism exist in schools
* But today, girls often outperform boys in school
* Some speak of feminization of education or growing presence of role models
* Girls are more likely to conform to middle-class normative behavior
* Large differences in subject matter – and related inequalities in labor market
position - remain
* boys = technique, natural science, ICT; girls = arts, social sciences, languages