Schmolck Flashcards

1
Q

What is the schmolck study to me?

A

Contemporary study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the aim?

A

To investigate the effects of specific brain damage on semantic memory using case studies- specifically relationship between semantic test scores, temporal lobe damage and the uniqueness of H.M.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the sample?

A

6 patients with amnesia compared to 8 normal control ppts

-matched on age, sex and education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How were the brain damaged ppts divided?

A

According to their brain damage:

  • MTL- medial temporal lobe
  • MTL+- medial temporal lobe and anterolateral temporal cortex damage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was the method used?

A

lab experiment over 5 sittings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how many tests were conducted?

A

13

9 were semantic tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

name 3 tasks they conducted?

A

naming and describing physical features
pyramid and palms task
filling in gaps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what were the results?

A

hippocampus damage- able to name, point out and answer questions about objects with considerable accuracy
MTL+ ppts performed less well-difficulty thinking of examples from a category
MTL+ 50% for living objects 62% for non-living objects
HM- 66.7% for living 90% for non-living

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what did they conclude?

A

MTL+ patients had greater difficulty than MTL suggesting that the anterolateral temporal cortex is responsible for semantic knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what experimental design was used?

A

matched pairs design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

EVALUATION-generalisability

A

+ppts were both male and female

-not representative- small sample, unique individuals making it hard to generalise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

EVALUATION-reliability

A

+lab based- replicable, less extraneous variables
+inter-rater reliability
-lab experiment- lacks mundane realism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

EVALUATION-applicability

A

+ the conclusions found can be applied and investigated in further studies/research
-hard to apply to real-life mundane realism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

EVALUATION-validity

A

+controls make results more valid

-lacks ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

EVALUATION-ethics

A
  • ethical issues with working with vulnerable people

+confidentiality was honoured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly