Baddeley Flashcards
What was Baddeleys aim?
To test the influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on the long term memory
Who were the participants?
- Men and women
- recruited from a psychology department
What was the procedure used?
- ppts given 1 of 4 lists
- each list was presented via a projector
After presentation ppts required to sit 4 memory tests - then asked to recall word list in 1 min by writing down sequence in correct order- all words presented to them in wrong order
- then given a 15min interference task
-Ppts then given a surprise recall task
What design measure was used?
Independent measures
Ppts given 1 list of words out of 4 lists
How many words were in each list?
10
What rate were the words presented on the projector?
1 word every 3 seconds
What was the interference task?
Copying 8 digit sequences at the ppts own pace
What controls were used?
- ppts weren’t warned in advance
- to prevent position of cards as a cue, 4 levels were used each with a different arrangement and eere frequently interchanged
- a hearing test was done- 3 ppts discarded due to imperfect score on hearing test
What were the results of the experiment?
- Recall of acoustically similar sounding words worse than dissimilar sounding words during initial phase of learning (trial 2 in particular)
- recall of similar and dissimilar sounding words not statistically significant by trial 4
- acoustic encoding was initially difficult
- semantically similar words more difficult to learn than semantically dissimilar words
What conclusions were formed?
STM is encoded acoustic
LTM is encoded semantically
EVALUATION- generalisability
- not andro/gynocentric
- ethnocentric
- recruited from psychology department- sample bias
EVALUATION- Reliability
- standardised procedure
Baddeley had conducted mamy ither trials before this experiment making the co trips and procedure more valid, minimising mistakes- cause and effect
EVALUATION- applicability
- supports MSM
- practical implications- how to revise effectively or just generally remember
EVALUATION-ethics
ppts weren’t warned in advance- deception
hearing test conducted- makes results more valid
lacks ecological validity