Schizophrenia Flashcards
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
What is schizophrenia (Sz)?
Sz: a disorder in which a person has difficulty distinguishing what is real from what is in their imagination.
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Finish these sentences:
Sz is experienced by about [ ]% of the world’s population.
It is more commonly diagnosed in [ ], [ ]-[ ] and [ ] socio-eonomic groups.
The symptoms of Sz can interfere severly with everyday tasks, so that many people with Sz end up [ ] or [ ].
0/7 = 1
2/7 = 2
4/7 = 3
6/7 = 4
7/7 = 5
Sz is experienced by about 1% of the world’s population.
It is more commonly diagnosed in men, city-dwellers and lower socio-eonomic groups.
The symptoms of Sz can interfere severly with everyday tasks, so that many people with Sz end up homeless or hospialised.
0/7 = 1
2/7 = 2
4/7 = 3
6/7 = 4
7/7 = 5
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
What’s the difference between a classification and a diagnosis?
classification: identifying clusters of symptoms that occur together and classifying it as one disorder (e.g. hallucinations, delusions)
diagnosis: identifying symptoms a person has and deciding what disorder it is (e.g. schizophrenia)
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Match up the following key terms to their definitions:
Co-morbidity
Gender bias
Culture bias
Symptom overlap
_______________________________________________________________________
A psychiatrist from one culture may misdiagnose people from a different cultural background.
When two disorders frequently occur together (e.g. Sz and bipolar disorder).
When disorders share the same symptoms which makes it difficult to distinguish between them.
When one gender is under diagnosed and/or one is over diagnosed (e.g. women may be underdiagnosed for Sz in the UK).
- Co-morbidity: When two disorders frequently occur together (e.g. Sz and bipolar disorder).
- Gender bias: When one gender is under diagnosed and/or one is over diagnosed (e.g. women may be underdiagnosed for Sz in the UK).
- Culture bias: A psychiatrist from one culture may misdiagnose people from a different cultural background.
- Symptom overlap: When disorders share the same symptoms which makes it difficult to distinguish between them.
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Define ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ symptoms.
positive symptoms: additional experiences beyond those of ordinary existence (add-ons) (e.g. hallucinations, delusions)
negative symptoms: loss of usual abilities and experiences (losses) (e.g. speech poverty, avolition)
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Outline hallucinations as a positive symptom of Sz.
HALLUCINATIONS:
- unusual sensory experiences
- could be random, could be related to the individual’s environment
- commonly hearing voices (auditory) (often critic)
- can be any sense: tactile (feeling things crawling on you), visions (distorted facial expressions)
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Outline delusions as a positive symptom of Sz.
DELUSIONS (also known as paranoia/irrational beliefs):
- make a person behave bizarrely
- e.g.) the individual believes they are in important historical figure like Napoléon or Jesus
e.g.) the individual believes they’re being persecuted by the government or aliens
- e.g.) the individual believes they have superpowers
- e.g.) the individual believes they are under external control
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Outline speech poverty as a negative symptom of Sz.
SPEECH POVERTY:
- a reduction in the quality and amount of speech
- changing topics mid-sentence, incoherent speech
- sometimes accompanied by a delay in a person’s responses in conversations
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Outline avolition as a negative symptom of Sz.
AVOLITION:
- a lack/struggle to keep up/begin goal-directed activity
- sharp reduction in motivation
- poor hygiene + grooming, lack of persistence in work/education, lack of energy (the 3 signs of avolition identified by Andreasen)
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Outline one limitation of the diagnosis of Sz, regarding low reliability.
P: One limitation of the diagnosis of Sz is that these diagnoses have low reliability.
E: For example, Cheniaux et al (2009) found when two psychiatrists independently assessed 100 clients using the ICD10 and DSM4, 68 were diagnosed according to the ICD10 system compared to only 39 under the DSM4 system.
E: This is a weakness because it suggests the ICD10 and DSM4 were not reliable in the diagnosis of Sz there was inconsistency between these two classification systems. This study also suggests that one of these is also more valid than the other since they produced a dramatically different number of diagnoses for the same disorder.
E: However, Osorio et al (2019) reported high inter-rater reliability (+0.97) and test-retest (+0.92) reliability using the DSM5. This suggests that this latest version of the DSM (DSM5) has high reliability due to the empirical evidence and therefore we can trust this classification system for reliable diagnoses for Sz.
L: As a result, the credibility of the DSM5 as a classification system for diagnosing Sz is increased due to its reliability, but there needs to be some more work done to ensure consistency across all classification systems to ensure the appropriate people are correctly diagnosed with Sz.
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Outline one limitation of the diagnosis of Sz, regarding low validity.
P: One limitation of the diagnosis of Sz is that these diagnoses sometimes have low validity.
E: For example, Buckley et al found that Sz is commonly diagnosed alongside other conditions (e.g. substance abuse) because it is a co-morbid disorder.
E: This is a weakness because it suggests our current diagnosis strategy provides an incomplete criteria for the symptoms of Sz to provide an accurate diagnosis, since Sz symptoms cannot be fully explained by just a diagnosis of Sz but is often diagnosed with other disorders.
E: Furthermore, there is some symptom overlap between Sz and other conditions, such as symptoms appear in both Sz and Bipolar disorder such as delusions and avolition. This further suggests that a diagnosis of Sz is not always diagnosed accurately since it could easily be confused/misdiagnosed for other disorders with very similar/the same symptoms.
L: As a result, the diagnosis of Sz suffers from low validity due to the incomplete explanation and criteria for what symptoms Sz encompasses.
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Outline one limitation of the diagnosis of Sz, regarding biased diagnoses (gender and cultural).
P: One limitation of the diagnosis of Sz is that these diagnoses are affected by gender and cultural biases.
E: For example, Sz diagnoses can be affected by cultural bias because some symptoms have different meanings in different cultures, e.g. hearing voices in Haiti may actually be interpreted as communication from ancestors. Furthermore, British people of African-Caribbean heritage are 9x more likely to receive a diagnosis than White British people.
E: Furthermore, Sz diagnoses can be affected by gender bias because men are diagnosed more often than women (1.4(men):1(women)).
E: These are weaknesses because is suggests that Sz is being inconsistently diagnosed between cultures and genders, which means those with a lower chance of being diagnosed, such as women, are less likely to receive the treatment they need to improve their quality of life.
L: As a result, the credibility of the diagnosis of Sz is reduced unreliable and inconsistent diagnoses across cultures and genders.
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Briefly outline and evaluate one study of validity in relation to the diagnosis of schizophrenia. [4 marks]
ROSENHAN (1973)
AO1:
- 7 students visited 12 different asylums in USA
- all faked hearing voices “hollow, empty, thud”
- all were admitted to a ward as ‘insane’
- once inside they behaved normally, saying the symptom had gone away and they were fine
- none were detected as being pseudo-patients
AO3:
- strength: brought about a revision of the classification system to incorporate a more in-depth overview of mental disorders
OR
- limitation: brought about widespread distrust of psychiatrists to accurately diagnose mental disorders
BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Outline the original dopamine hypothesis.
- high levels of dopamine in subcortical regions in the brain
- subcortical hypERdopaminergia
- e.g.) excess of dopamine receptors in Boca’s area explains speech poverty as a symptom of Sz
BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Outline the updated dopamine hypothesis.
(- in addition to hypERdopaminergia)
- low levels of dopamine in cortex
- cortical hypOdopaminergia
- e.g.) defecit of dopamine in prefrontal cortex (thinking) could explain cognitive problems (-ve symptoms)
- cortical hypOdopaminergia leads to subcortical hypERdopaminergia
BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
What acronym can we use to remember the original and updated dopamine hypotheses?
Only
Happy
Squirels
Bury
Seeds
Under
Large
Coarse
Pine
Cones
Original
High (=hyper)
Subcortical
Broca
Speech
Updated
Low (=hypo)
Cortex
Prefrontal
Cognitive
BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Briefly outline one strength and one weakness of the dopamine hypotheses.
strength:
- research has shown that drugs that increase the levels of dopamine produce schizophrenic symptoms => shows higher levels of dopamine are linked to Sz symptoms which supports dopamine hypothesis
weakness:
- clozapine is the most effective drug at reducing Sz symptoms + acts on dopamine and serotonin => dopamine hypothesis isn’t a complete explanation if serotonin is also being acted on because this suggests that serotonin also has a role to play in Sz, which isn’t included in the dopamine hypothesis
BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Outline family studies as a genetic explanation of Sz.
family studies:
- Gottesman (1991) large-scale family study: risk of Sz increases with genetic similarity to a relative with the disorder
- e.g.) aunt with Sz => 2% chance of developing Sz
- e.g.) sibling with Sz => 9% chance of developing Sz
- e.g.) identical twin with Sz => 48% chance of developing Sz
- family members tend to share aspects of their environment as well as may of their genes so the correlation represents them both, but family studies still give good support for the importance of genes in Sz