Psychopathology Flashcards
DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
What are the 4 definitions of abnormality?
- STATISTICAL INFREQUENCY: occurs when an individual has a less common characteristic, such as being more depressed or less intelligent than most of the population.
- DEVIATION FROM SOCIAL NORMS: concerns behaviour that is different from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community or society.
- FAILURE TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY: occurs when someone is unable to cope with the ordinary demands of day-to-day life.
- DEVIATION FROM IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH: occurs when someone doesn’t meet the criteria for ideal mental health, as outlined by Jahoda.
DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
Evaluate Statistical Infrequency as a definition of abnormality.
STRENGTH: real-world application
- useful in diagnosis of depression (score of 30+ on Beck depression inventory (BDI))
- useful in diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder (IQ of lower than 70)
~~> value of statistical infrequency criteria is useful in diagnostic and assessment processes.
WEAKNESS: unusual characteristics can be positive
- IQ is normally distributed, so an IQ of <70 or >150 is “abnormal” but IQ>150 isn’t something that requires treatment
- similarly, low BDI score is technically “abnormal” (normally distributed) but is a good thing.
~~> never sufficient as the sole basis for defining abnormality
DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
Evaluate Deviation From Social Norms as a definition of abnormality
STRENGTH: real-world application
- key defining characteristic of anti-social personality disorder, the signs of it are all deviations of social norms
- such norms also play a part in diagnosing schizotypal personality disorder (where behaviour is defined as “strange”, therefore socially abnormal)
~~> deviation from social norms has value in psychiatry
WEAKNESS: cultural and situational relativism
- one group’s social norms may differ or even oppose another’s social norms, e.g. hearing voices in Western culture is diagnosed as schizophrenia, whereas in other cultures it means hearing from ancestors and is associated with high authority
- cultural norms in one society differ between situations, e.g. aggressive and deceitful behaviour in a family setting is less culturally acceptable than in the context of corporate deal-making
~~> difficult to judge deviation from social norms across different situations and cultures
DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
Evaluate Failure To Function Adequately as a definition of abnormality
STRENGTH: represents a threshold for help
- 25% of UK get a mental health issue each year, but many people only seek help when they begin to fail to function adequately
~~>treatment and services can be targeted to those who need them most
WEAKNESS: discrimination and social control
- some labelled as “failing to function” may be functioning fine, just in a different way to others/deviating from social norms (e.g. choosing not to have a job)
~~> people who make unusual choices may be at risk of being labelled abnormal and their freedom of choice may be restricted
DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
Evaluate Deviation From Ideal Mental Health as a definition of abnormality
STRENGTH: a comprehensive definition
- criteria distinguishes mental health from mental disorder
- covers most of the reasons why we may seek professional help
- this means an individual’s mental health can be discussed meaningfully with a range of professionals who take different theoretical views (e.g. humanistic counsellor interested in self-actualisation vs medically-trained psychiatrist interested in symptoms)
~~> ‘ideal mental health’ provides a checklist against we can assess ourselves and others, and discuss psychological issues with a range of professionals
LIMITATION: cultural-specific
- Jahoda’s criteria is generally in the context of USA and Europe.
- in particular, the concept of self-actualisation would probably be dismissed as self-indulgent in much of the world.
- even within Europe there is variation in the value placed on personal independence (high value in Germany, low value in Italy)
- what defines success in our working, social and love-lives differs between cultures
~~> difficult to apply concept of ideal mental health from one culture to another
DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
What is Jahoda’s (1958) criteria for ‘ideal mental health’? (there are 8)
- we have no symptoms or distress
- we are rational and can perceive ourselves accurately
- we can self-actualise
- we can cope with stress
- we have a realistic view of the world
- we have good self-esteem and lack guilt
- we are independent of other people
- we can successfully work, love, and enjoy our leisure
DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
According to Rosenhan and Seligman (1989), when is someone failing to function adequately? Give an example
- when a person no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules, e.g. maintaining eye contact and personal space
- when a person experiences severe personal distress
- when a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others
EXAMPLE: intellectual disability disorder
- having a very low IQ, below 70
- a statistical infrequency
- an individual must also be failing to function adequately in order to be diagnosed
DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
What is meant by statistical infrequency? Give an example
- any behaviour that is statistically unusual/uncommon
EXAMPLE: IQ and intellectual disability disorder
- IQ is normally distributed (most people have IQ of 100, rare to find IQ of <85 or 115<)
- those scoring below 70 are ‘abnormal’ and are diagnosed with intellectual disability disorder
DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
What are social norms? Give an example of deviation from social norms
- norms are specific to the culture and generation we live in
- there are few that we would consider universally abnormal on the basis that they breach social norms, e.g. homosexuality was considered abnormal in our culture in the past and continues to be seen as abnormal in some cultures
EXAMPLE: antisocial personality disorder
- impulsive, aggressive, irresponsible
- according to DSM-5 (manual used by psychiatrists to diagnose mental disorders), one important symptom is deviation from social norms
PHOBIAS
What is a phobia? Outline the 3 categories of phobias
PHOBIA:
- excessive fear and anxiety
- triggered by an object, place or situation
- the extent to the fear is disproportionate to the danger presented by the phobic stimulus
CATEGORIES:
- specific phobia: phobia of an object, such as an animal or body part, or a situation such as flying or having an injection
- social anxiety (social phobia): phobia of a certain situation such as public speaking or using a public toilet
- agoraphobia: phobia of being outside or in a public place
PHOBIAS
Outline the 3 behavioural characteristics of phobias
PANIC
- panic in response to a phobic stimulus
- involves crying, screaming, running away, etc
- children may react slightly differently, e.g. clinging, freezing, tantrum
AVOIDANCE
- a person may go to a lot of effort to avoid coming into contact with the phobic stimulus
- makes it hard to go about daily life
ENDURANCE
- alternative to avoidance
- person chooses to remain in the presence of a phobic stimulus
- e.g. keeping a wary eye on the spider across the room in case it tries to come near you
PHOBIAS
Outline the 3 emotional characteristics of phobias
ANXIETY
(- phobias are classed as anxiety disorders)
- emotional response of anxiety, an unpleasant state of high arousal
- prevents relaxation
- makes it difficult to experience any positive emotion
- can be long-term
FEAR
- immediate and extremely unpleasant response to an encounter with/thoughts about the phobic stimulus
- usually more intense and experienced for shorter periods than anxiety
UNREASONABLE EMOTIONAL RESPONSE
- the anxiety or fear is much greater than is ‘normal’, disproportionate to any threat posed
PHOBIAS
Define and outline the 3 cognitive characteristics of phobias
cognitive characteristic: the way we think about and process information
SELECTIVE ATTENTION TO PHOBIC STIMULUS
- hard to look away from phobic stimulus if visible
- keeping attention on threat is our best chance at reacting quickly to a threat, but not so useful when fear is irrational
- e.g. a person with pognophobia may find it difficult to concentrate if there is someone with a beard in the room
IRRATIONAL BELIEFS
- person may hold unfounded (unrealistic) thoughts in reaction to phobic stimuli
- e.g. social phobias can involve beliefs like “i must always sound intelligent”
- this kind of belief increases the pressure on the person to perform well in social situations
COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS
- a person’s perceptions may be inaccurate and unrealistic
PHOBIAS
What are these phobias?
Arachnophobia
Coulrophobia
Pognophobia
Alphabutyrophobia
Arachnophobia: fear of spiders
Coulrophobia: fear of clowns
Pognophobia: fear of beards
Alphabutyrophobia: fear of peanut butter
BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
Briefly outline the behavioural approach to explaining phobias (use the 3 key concepts and a psychologist in a sentence)
MOWRER’s TWO-PROCESS MODEL is based on the behavioural approach to phobias, where phobias are ACQUIRED BY CLASSICAL CONDITIONING and MAINTAINED BY OPERANT CONDITIONING
BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
Outline the behaviourist view on the acquisition of phobias, using an example
CLASSICAL CONDITIONING
- learning to associate something that we don’t initially fear (NS) with something that triggers a fear response (UCS)
- formula:
UCS –> UCR
UCS + NS –> UCR
CS –> CR
EXAMPLE: LITTLE ALBERT (Watson and Rayner 1920)
- created phobia of white rats in 9-month-old baby called ‘Little Albert’
- start: showed no signs of unusual anxiety, tried to play with a white rat when shown to him
- whenever the white rat was presented to Albert, it was presented with a loud noise which frightened him. (7 times)
- formula:
UCS (loud noise) –> UCR (fear)
UCS (loud noise) + NS (white rat) –> UCR (fear)
CS (white rat) –> CR (fear)
- Albert learned to associate the white rat with the loud noise, and so he learned to fear the white rat even without the presence of the loud noise
- this conditioning then generalised to similar objects: non-white rabbit, fur coast, Watson wearing a Santa beard made out of cotton wool balls - all of which Albert was now afraid of
BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
Outline the behaviourist view on the maintenance of phobias
OPERANT CONDITIONING
- phobia –> person avoids the phobic stimulus –> positively reinforced by the reduced feeling of fear (since they’re not in the presence of their phobia)
- Mowrer said: desirable consequences => behaviour is likely to be repeated –> will avoid the phobic stimulus more often –> phobia is maintained
BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
Evaluate Mowrer’s Two-Process Model
STRENGTH: real-world application (exposure therapies)
- the Two-Process Model is the idea that phobias are maintained by avoidance of the phobic stimulus
- this is important in explaining why people with phobias benefit to being exposed to the phobic stimulus
- once avoidance behaviour is prevented, it ceases to be reinforced by the anxiety reduction => avoidance declines
- in behavioural terms, the phobia IS the avoidance behaviour so when the avoidance is prevented, the phobia is cured
~~> shows value of Two-Process Model because it identifies a means of treating phobias
STRENGTH: evidence for link between phobias and traumatic experiences
- Little Albert illustrates how a frightening experience involving a stimulus can lead to a phobia of that stimulus
- Jongh et al (2006): 73% people with a fear of dental treatment had experienced a traumatic experience (mostly involving dentistry), compared to a control group of people with low dental anxiety, where only 21% had experienced a traumatic event
~~> confirms association between stimulus (dentistry) and an UCR (pain) does lead to the development of the phobia
——-> COUNTERPOINT: not all phobias appear following a bad experience
- some common phobias (e.g. snakes) occur in populations where very few people have any experience of snakes, let alone traumatic ones
- considering other direction, not all frightening experiences lead to phobias (e.g. car crashes don’t often lead to phobia of driving etc)
~~> association between phobias and frightening experiences is not as strong as we would expect if behavioural theories provided a complete explanation
LIMITATION: neglects cognitive aspects
- Two-Process Model focuses on explaining behaviour, i.e. the key behaviour of avoiding the phobic stimulus, but phobias have a significant cognitive element too
- e.g. irrational beliefs about phobic stimulus (‘spiders are dangerous’)
- Two-Process Model explains avoidance behaviour but doesn’t offer an adequate explanation for phobic cognitions
~~> model doesn’t completely explain the symptoms of phobias
THE BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO TREATING PHOBIAS
Outline Systematic Desensitisation as a treatment for phobias
- gradually reduces anxiety through counterconditioning
ANXIETY HIERARCHY
- put together by client and therapist
- list of phobic situation arranged from least anxiety-inducing to most
- e.g. a photo of a spider to having one crawl over you
RELAXATION
- therapist teaches patient to relax as deeply as possible
- impossible to be relaxed and afraid at the same time, one prevents the other: reciprocal inhibition
- e.g. breathing exercises, mental imagery techniques, mediation (in extreme cases we use Valium (drug))
EXPOSURE
- starting at bottom of hierarchy, client is gradually exposed to phobias stimuli while in relaxed state
- when a client can stay relaxed in one level of the hierarchy, they can move on to the next one
- treatment is successful when client can stay relaxed in high anxiety-inducing situations on their hierarchy
THE BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO TREATING PHOBIAS
Outline Flooding as a treatment for phobias
- immediate exposure to high anxiety-inducing situation
- sessions are typically longer than SD, and often only one long session is needed
- patient is prevented from AVOIDING the phobic stimulus
- patient quickly learns that the phobic stimulus is harmless (called EXTINCTION)
- patients are exposed to the phobic stimulus until they become so EXHAUSTED from the high anxiety that they start to relax
- traumatic but NOT UNETHICAL because they give their full consent
THE BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO TREATING PHOBIAS
Give two strengths of Systematic Desensitisation as a treatment for phobias
STRENGTH: evidence of effectiveness
- Gilroy et al (2003): followed 42 people who had SD for arachnophobia in 3 45-minute sessions
- at both 3 and 33 months, the SD group were less fearful than a control group treated by relaxation without exposure
- Wechsler et al 2019): SD is effective for specific phobias, social phobias and agoraphobia
~~> SD likely to be effective for treating a wide range of patients with phobias
STRENGTH: Favoured with patients
- lower refusal rates (refusing to take part from the start)
- lower attrition rates (dropping out before the end)
- when given a choice, patients tend to choose SD over flooding
~~> SD appear to have higher success rate because it has lower attrition and refusal rates
THE BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO TREATING PHOBIAS
Give one strength and two limitations of Flooding as a treatment of phobias
STRENGT: cost-effective
- at least as effective as SD for treating specific phobias
- quicker than SD
- positive implications for the economy (both for therapists - less sessions - and patients - getting back to work)
~~> patients are free of their phobia
LIMITATION: less effective with social phobias
- social phobias have cognitive aspects, situations thoughts about the social situation
- better treatment for social phobias would be cognitive therapies which tackle irrational thinking
~~> flooding not always appropriate
LIMITATION: people with learning disabilities
- people with learning difficulties often struggle with cognitive therapies that require complex rational thought
- may also feel confused and distressed by the traumatic experience of flooding
~~> Flooding is often inappropriate for people with learning disabilities who have phobias