Schacter And Singer- Biological Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Background

A

Two factor theory of emotion where emotion= psycological and psysiological

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Method

A

Laboratory with observation and self report questionnaires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Variables

A

EPI / NF - injected w/ epinephrine AND told TRUE effects
EDI MIS - injected w/ epinephrine AND told FALSE effects
EPI IGN - injected w/ epinephrine AND told NO effects
Placebo - injected with saline solution AND told NOTHING MORE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explanation

A

EPI INF - should not copy stooge
Placebo - should not copy stooge
EPI MIS - Misinformed -> seek explanation -> copy stooge
EPI IGN - Seek explanation -> copy stooge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Design

A

Independent measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Participants

A

All male college students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sampling technique

A

Self selecting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Apparatus

A

One way mirror (covert), epinephrine (adrenaline), placebo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Controls

A
  • All given an injection
  • Received same instructions
  • Stooge respected same behaviour
  • same equipment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure

A
  1. Taken to private room, told study was to test vision and that the injection was a vitamin
  2. Placed in room and introduced to “other participant” -> stooge
  3. Stooge behaved either:
    Euphoric: doodled paper, crumpled it, played basketball, asked participant to join, made paper plane, built tower, hula-hoops
    Angry: began answering questionnaire, made aggressive comments
  4. experimenter entered room, handed out questionnaire
  5. Debrief
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Data

A

OBSERVATION
Controlled + structured objective behaviour coded into 4 categories for euphoria, 6 for anger

SELF REPORT
Subjective w/ self questionnaire
mock questions + 2 emotional ones
5 point scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Findings

A

In epinephrine group -> more psychological responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Conclusions

A

All 3 propositions are supported and so the findings of the study provide experimental evidence for 2 factor theory of emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation

A

Ethics: Stooges (deceiving BUT w/out stooge -> study not reliable = WEAKNESS

Theory: provides evidence for a theory = STRENGTH

Biological cognitive approach: interaction between biological and cognitive factors = STRENGTH

Sample: Volunteers= STRENGTH
male, paid 4 participation, students= not generalisable = WEAKNESS

Controls: many controls to prove IV caused (STRENGTH) or low in ecological validity (WEAKNESS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly