Background
Two factor theory of emotion where emotion= psycological and psysiological
Method
Laboratory with observation and self report questionnaires
Variables
EPI / NF - injected w/ epinephrine AND told TRUE effects
EDI MIS - injected w/ epinephrine AND told FALSE effects
EPI IGN - injected w/ epinephrine AND told NO effects
Placebo - injected with saline solution AND told NOTHING MORE
Explanation
EPI INF - should not copy stooge
Placebo - should not copy stooge
EPI MIS - Misinformed -> seek explanation -> copy stooge
EPI IGN - Seek explanation -> copy stooge
Design
Independent measure
Participants
All male college students
Sampling technique
Self selecting
Apparatus
One way mirror (covert), epinephrine (adrenaline), placebo
Controls
Procedure
Data
OBSERVATION
Controlled + structured objective behaviour coded into 4 categories for euphoria, 6 for anger
SELF REPORT
Subjective w/ self questionnaire
mock questions + 2 emotional ones
5 point scale
Findings
In epinephrine group -> more psychological responses
Conclusions
All 3 propositions are supported and so the findings of the study provide experimental evidence for 2 factor theory of emotion
Evaluation
Ethics: Stooges (deceiving BUT w/out stooge -> study not reliable = WEAKNESS
Theory: provides evidence for a theory = STRENGTH
Biological cognitive approach: interaction between biological and cognitive factors = STRENGTH
Sample: Volunteers= STRENGTH
male, paid 4 participation, students= not generalisable = WEAKNESS
Controls: many controls to prove IV caused (STRENGTH) or low in ecological validity (WEAKNESS)