Scale Creation and Exploratory Factor Analysis Flashcards
Explain the three different construct dimensionalities
Latent model underlining construct which cannot be measured, ex. Organizational attractiveness. Instead, it is to be measured on its dimensions.
o Constructs can be measured on the same scale.
o Expect subdimensions to be correlated and therefore reflect the underlying construct together.
o Want to measure what the dimensions have in common
o Usually scales.
Aggregate model: the multidimensional constructs can be formed as an algebraic function of its dimensions.
o add dimensions together to understand the construct.
o Usually indexes
o The constructs is formed from its dimensions.
Profile model: the multidimensional constructs is interpreted as various profiles formed by pairing the characteristics of different dimensions.
o combine subdimensions to understand the construct, ex. Personality.
o Specific different levels of dimensions and interpret the construct by profiling the levels.
o Don’t look at it as an average or added up together.
Define different types Variances of the Construct
Observed variances of a variable can be partitioned into four elements:
o Common variances: those shared by all dimensions of the multidimensional construct.
o Group variances: those shared by only some dimensions.
o Specific variances: variances unique to a single dimension.
o Random variances: variances caused by random factors
What are seen as true variances under the latent model?
- Under the latent model, only common variances and covariances shared by all dimensions are seen as true variances of the construct.
o The other type of variance is seen as error variances.
What are seen as true variances under the aggregate model?
Under the aggregate model, all but random variance, are seen as true variances, while random variance is seen as error variances.
What are seen as true variances under the profil model?
Under the profile model, depending on the dichotomization criterion, the proportion that is considered as true variances may or may not cover the common variances, group variances, or specific variances.
In EFA how many measured variables are recommended to represent one factor?
At least three to five measured variables representing each common factor should be included
When should EFA be used?
EFA should be used when the primary goal is to identify latent constructs and there is insufficient basis to specify a prior model.
associated with theory development
When should CFA be used?
CFA should be used when the goal is to identify latent constructs and a substantial basis exist to specify a prior model.
associated with theory testing.
When should principal component analysis be used?
If the goal is data reduction, principal components analysis is more appropriate.
When selecting the number of factors in EFA what is the trade-off?
Balance the need for parsimony (i.e., a model with relatively few common factors) against the need for plausibility (i.e., a model with sufficient number of common factors to adequately account for the correlations among measured variables)
- In general, too few factors are the biggest issue
Is overfactoring good?
Yes. Overfactoring often result in rotated solutions in which the major factors are accurately represented, and the additional factors have no measured variables that load substantially on them or have only a single measured variable that loads substantially on each additional factor.
What is the Kaiser criterion used for?
computing the eigenvalues for the correlation matrix to determine how many of these eigenvalues are greater than 1.
o This number is used as the number of factors. Retain factors with eigenvalue greater than 1.
Factors should explain at least 60 %
What is the Scree test used for?
the eigenvalues of the correlation matrix are computed and then plotted in order of descending values.
o This graph is then examined to identify the last substantial drop in the magnitude of the eigenvalues.
Does an EFA model with more than one factor have a unique solution?
An EFA model with more than one factor do not have a unique solution. For any given solution with two or more factors there exists an infinite number of alternative orientations of the factors in multidimensional space that will explain the data equally well.
Hence, why factor rotation is used.
What is the general recommendation in terms of rotation i EFA?
oblique rotation