Rylands V Fletcher Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

how to structure a R v F PQ

A

intro
who is D?
why?
who is C?
why?
what are they claiming for - what has been damaged?
all 4 elements
defences
remedies
conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what type of tort is R v F?

A

strict liability tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 4 factors that need to be proven for a successful claim?

A

1.bringing onto the land and accumulation
2.thing must be likely to cause mischief when it escapes
3.it must be non natural use of the land
4. it just escape and cause RF damage that is not too remote to the adjoining property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what case decided the four factors?

A

Rylands v Fletcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how is someone a claimant? + case for this

A

must have an interest in the land affected
Transco v stockport

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how is someone a defendant? + case

A

D have some control over the land material is stored. Owner or occupier
Read v Lyon’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When is something not an accumulation? + cases

A

When it is naturally present- Giles v Walker

When it naturally accumulates - Ellison v Ministry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

description of the 2nd test and case?

A

“thing likely to do mischief if it escapes”
if doesn’t escape no claim
test means was the damage foreseeable - Hale v Jennings Bros

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is non natural use of land? + case

A

extraordinary or some unusual use of the land
storage of things associated with domestic use of land is normally not non natural - rickards v lothian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

if there is public benefit is it non natural?

A

No - British celanese v A H Hunt

unless level of danger is exceptionally high - Cambridge water v eastern counties leather

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case to use for non natural use of land and what does it say?

A

Transco v stockport MBC - non natural is out of the ordinary, considering the time place and public benefit is not relevant personal injury isn’t relevant either.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the case for “must escape onto an adjoining property” 4th test

A

read v lyons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

does a byproduct of the thing escaping fulfill the 4th test + case

A

no - stannard v gore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

case for thing just cause RF damage that is not too remote?

A

cambridge water v eastern counties leather

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

defences for R v F

A

consent
contributory negligence
act of stranger
act it god
statutory authority
common benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly