Occupiers liability 1984 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

under what section number does the occupier owe a duty to trespassers

A

S.1(1)(a) - unlawful visitors for personal injury only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What reasons would an occupier owe a duty to a trespasser

A

1.aware or has reasonable grounds to believe danger exists
2.knows or has reasonable grounds to believe there is trespassers in the vicinity
3. The danger is one the occupier is reasonably expected to provide some protection against

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the DOC for adult trespassers + section number

A

S.1(4) - take such care as is reasonable in the circumstances to see that the trespasser is not injured by the danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what factors would you consider to see if the occupier is liable?

A

obvious danger?
expect anyone at that time of day or year?
we’re warning signs ignored?
reason to suspect presence of a trespasser?
aware of the danger?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

is the occupier liable if the trespasser is injured by an obvious danger + case?

A

NO
Ratcliff v mcConell - occupier not required to warn them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

is the occupier liable if they did not expect anyone at that time to day or year? + case

A

NO
Donoghue v folkestone properties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

will the occupier be liable if warning signs are ignored? + case

A

NO
Tomlinson v congleton borough council

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

will the occupier be liable if they had no reason to suspect presence of a trespasser + case

A

NO
Higgs v foster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

is the occupier liable if they were not aware of the danger or had no reason to believe the danger existed + case

A

NO
Rhind v Astbury water park - didn’t know danger was there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

do the same rules apply to children as they do to adults? + case

A

YES
Keown v coventry healthcare NHS trust - boy was aware of danger and no issue with premises so not liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

defences to 84

A

contributory neg
consent
warning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly