Roconstructive memory Flashcards
Who came up with the reconstructive memory idea
Bartlett (1932)
What did he say reconstructive memory was
Fragments of previous memories coming together to make a whole
- Memory was a whole, had to be reconstructive
How did he test this idea of reconstructive memory
Showed participants ‘War of the Ghosts’ story
- They read it and reproduced it 15 minutes later
- Then another person read the new version
- and so on and so on
What did Bartlett find as a result of this
Story had changed and became shorter.
- Some phrases altered to match participants culture
- Words like ‘canoe’ changed to ‘boat’
What was the transformation of the story called
Rationalisation
What does rationalisation mean
Changing phrases to match ones culture
What type of reproductiong did Bartlett use for his war of ghosts story
Serial reproduction
What is serial reproduction
one person reads a set of information before reproducing it for another person, who then reproduces it for a third person, who does the same for a fourth, and so on.
What theory did Bartlett develop as a result of his experiment to try and explain the results
Schema theory
What is a schema
Package of memory containing all stored memory of the world
How do schemas work
During an experience you activate a relevant schema (if you go to the cinema you use ur cinema schema)
- allows us to process info by guessing what will happen based off past experiences
What is a weakness of this theory
It’s wrong to suggest that all memories are inaccurate or affected by schemas.
Weakness of this theory: Evidence to suggest not all memory is inaccurate
In situations that are personally important or distinctive, we remember considerable amount of detail
example: in war of ghosts participants recalled ‘something black came out my mouth’ because it was unusual.
Weakness of theory: what does this evidence suggest
People do not always reconstruct memories, and when they do, it can be very accurate.
What is a strength of the application of this theory
This theory can be used to explain problems such as eye-witness testimony