RM: Experiments Flashcards
Define IV
The variable that changes or is manipulated by the researcher to see if it has an effect on the DV
Define DV
Variable that the researcher measures. To see the effect of the IV
State the difference between an aim and a hypothesis (2 marks)
Aim is a general statement of what the researcher intends to investigate, the purpose of the study
Whereas
Hypothesis is a specific testable statement in which researcher predicts what will happen between the variables
Directional hypothesis frame
There will be significantly higher/faster/more (operationalised DV) when participants (one condition of IV) compared to when participants (other condition of the IV
Non directional hypothesis frame
There will be a significant difference in (operationalised DV) when participants (one condition of IV) compared to when participants (other condition of the IV)
When do you use directional hypothesis and when do you use a non directional hypothesis
Directional:
All past research has shown
Previous research has shown
Non directional:
New area of research
Limited previous research
Mixed findings
Define extraneous variables (2)
Unwanted extra variables other than the IV (1 mark) that could have an effect of the DV, this would lower the internal validity of the study ( 2nd mark)
3 main causes of extraneous variables
Situational factors - things to do with the environment the research is carried out in e.g. task difficulty OR standardised instructions.
- Participant variables - things to do with the Ppts e.g. ages, gender, IQ, eye sight, hearing, personality. TOPT TIP!! These can only be used for an independent groups design, not matched pairs or repeated measures.
- Experimenter variables - things to do with the researcher e.g. investigator effects.
What is a confounding variable
This is when an extraneous variable is not controlled for and it DOES affect the DV and so it becomes a confounding variable.
Describe a lab experimental method
An experiment conducted in a lab which is a highly controlled environment, (1 MARK) where the researcher manipulates (changes) the independent variable (IV) and records (measures) the effect on the dependent variable (DV) 2ND MARK.
AO3 strengths for lab method
High level of control over extraneous variables e.g. light as its carried out in a fake environment, therefore cause and effect can be established between the IV and the DV which increases the internal validity of the research.
High in reliability as the experiment can be easily repeated in the same conditions to check for consistent results.
AO3 limitations for lab method
Lacks Ecological validity as it’s carried out in a fake environment therefore it is difficult to generalise the finings beyond the setting of the study, lowering the external validity.
Can encourage demand characteristics, where the Ppt’s change their natural behaviour based on clues given off by the researcher this could lead to ppts choosing to either help or hinder the researcher, reducing the internal validity.
Describe a field experiment
An experiment which takes place in a natural environment (for the ppts) such as an office or school (1 MARK) where the researcher manipulates (changes) the independent variable (IV) and records (measures) the effect on the dependent variable (DV) 2ND MARK.
AO3 strengths for field experiment
Less prone to demand characteristics as people might not know they are being watched so they are less likely to guess clues given off by the researcher and change their natural behaviour. Therefore increasing the internal validity.
High ecological validity as it is based in a real life setting therefore it is easier to generalise the finings beyond the setting of the study to other similar settings increasing the external validity.
AO3 limitations for a field experiment
Low in reliability as the environment is real so it is difficult to repeat with exactly the same conditions to check for consistent results.
This could create an ethical issue of lack of informed consent as people may not be aware they are being studied on so wouldn’t have given their consent. If they become aware they may become upset and wish to withdraw their data from the research.
Describe a natural experiment
The researcher takes advantage of a naturally occurring IV. This is a natural experiment because the variable would have changed even if the experimenter was not interested.
AO3 strengths for natural experiment
Natural experiments provide opportunities for research that may not otherwise be undertaken for practical or ethical reasons. For example, Rutter’s study on Romanian orphans would have been unethical to manipulate unless the institutionalisation (IV) had not occurred naturally. Therefore, natural experiments contribute to a greater psychological understanding of behaviour.
High ecological validity as natural experiments are often based in a real life setting therefore it is easier to generalise the finings beyond the setting of the study to other similar settings increasing the external validity
AO3 limitations for natural experiment
Naturally occurring event may only happen very rarely which limits opportunities for research, unlike lab experiments where IVs can be manipulated by the researcher any time. Suggesting other types of experiment may be more convenient for research than natural experiments.
Low control over extraneous variables as natural experiments usually take place in a natural environment. Therefore it is difficult to establish cause and effect between the IV and the DV lowering the internal validity of the study.
Describe a quasi experiment
An experiment which has an IV based on an existing difference between people (1 mark) which the researcher has not manipulated e.g. age or gender (1 MARK) and the researcher records (measures) the effect on the DV
AO3 strength for quasi
REMEMBER –
QUASI CAN BE CONDUCTED IN A NATURAL OR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT (Field or Lab). THEREFORE, DEPENDING ON THE SCENARIO, YOU WOULD HAVE TO SELECT THE APPROPRIATE EVALUATION (STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES).
AO3 limitations of a quasi experiment
Sample bias as the sample being studied may have unique characteristics, which may mean that it is difficult to generalise to the target population decreasing the external validity of the study.
What are the controls for experimental methods
Double/single blind
Randomisation
Standardisation
What are the problems with experimental methods that we need to control for
Demand characteristics and bias
How do you control for demand characteristics in an experimental method
Use a double or single blind
Double blind: getting another researcher who does not know the true aims of the research (context) to carry out the experiment. No clues are given off
Single blind: keeping the aim of the research hidden from the participant. Ppts is unsure about the aim so is unable to display demand characteristics. Increases internal validity
How do we control for bias in an experimental method
Randomisation and standardisation
Randomisation: aspects of research done randomly and not decided by researcher. All potential items in a hat. Draw out as many needed for condition 1 and then draw out however many needed for condition 2
Standardisation: all participants experience the same environment and instructions to avoid extraneous variables. Matching elements on task difficulty. Same instructions read or printed.