RM - Content analysis and Case studies Flashcards
Coding
The process of placing quantitative or qualitative data in categories.
Content analysis
A kind of observational study in which behaviour is usually observed indirectly in visual, written or verbal material. May involve either qualitative or quantitative analysis or both.
Thematic analysis
A technique used when analysing qualitative data, Themes or categories are identified and then data is organised according to these themes.
How is the process of content analysis different to any other observational study?
Instead of observing actual people, a researcher usually makes observations indirectly through books, films, advertisements and photographs - any artefact people have produced.
What does the researcher have to make design decisions about in content analysis?
Sampling method, coding the data, and method of representing data.
What does the researcher have to decide about the design of the sampling method?
- If the analysing the content of books, does the researcher look at every page or just, say, every fifth page (a kind of time sampling)?
- If comparing the content in various books, does the researcher select books randomly from a library or identify certain characteristics (e.g. look at books that are biographies or romantic fiction)?
- If analysing ads on TV, does the researcher sample behaviours, say, every 30s, and not whenever certain behaviours occur?
What does the researcher have to decide about the design of coding the data?
Decisions about behavioural categories may involve a thematic analysis.
What does the process of coding mean in content analysis?
That the researcher uses behavioural categories.
What does the researcher have to decide about the design of the method of presenting data?
Data can be recorded in each behavioural category in 2 different ways:
You can count instances = a quantitative analysis.
You can describe examples in each category = a qualitative analysis.
What are the strengths of content analysis?
- High ecological validity because it is based on observations of what people actually do (real communications that are current and relevant, such as recent newspapers or the books that people read).
- Reliability can be tested as sources can be retained or accessed by others (e.g. back copies of magazines or videos of people giving speeches), the content analysis can be replicated, and therefore the observations can be tested for reliability.
What are the weaknesses of content analysis?
- Observer bias reduces the objectivity and validity of findings because different observers may interpret the meaning of the behavioural categories differently.
- Likely to be culture biased because interpretation of verbal or written content will be affected by the language and culture of the observer and the behavioural categories used.
Who did a study using a quantitative content analysis?
Anthony Manstead and Caroline McCulloch (1981).
What did Anthony Manstead and Caroline McCulloch (1981) do a study using?
A quantitative content analysis.
Describe the study done by Anthony Manstead and Caroline McCulloch (1981) using a quantitative content analysis.
They were interested in the way men and women are portrayed in TV ads.
They observed 170 ads over a one-week period, ignoring those that contained only children or those with animals.
In each ad they focused on the central adult figure and recorded frequencies in a table.
For each ad there might be no ticks, one tick or a number of ticks.
What table did the study done by Anthony Manstead and Caroline McCulloch (1981) using a quantitative content analysis include?
A separate column for male and female.
Four main headings with subheadings which were characteristics to be ticked.
Credibility basis of central character: - Product user - Product authority Role of central character: - Dependent role - Independent role Argument spoken by central character: - Factual - Opinion Product type used by central character - Food/drink - Alcohol - Body - Household
What was the study done by Anthony Manstead and Caroline McCulloch (1981) using a quantitative content analysis interested in?
The way men and women are portrayed in TV ads.
Who did a study using a qualitative content analysis?
Katja Joronen and Paivi Astedt-Kurki (2005)
What did Katja Joronen and Paivi Astedt-Kurki (2005) do a study using?
A qualitative content analysis.
Describe the study done by Katja Joronen and Paivi Astedt-Kurki (2005) using a qualitative content analysis.
A Finnish study considered the role of the family in adolescents’ peer and school experiences.
They conducted semi-structured interviews with 19 adolescents aged 12-16, using questions such as ‘What does your family know about yours peers?’ and ‘How is your family involved in your school activities?’
These interviews produced 234 pages of notes which were analysed using a qualitative content analysis.
- All answers to the same question were placed together.
- Each statement was compressed into a briefer statement and given an identifier code.
- These statements were compared with each other and categorised so that statements with similar content were placed together and a category (or theme) identified.
- The categories were grouped into larger units, producing eight main categories; for example:
- Enablement, e.g. ‘Yeah, ever since my childhood we’ve always had lots of kids over visiting.’ (Girl 15 years)
- Support, e.g. ‘They [family members] help if I have a test by asking questions.’ (Boy, 13 years)
- Negligence, e.g. ‘My sister is not at all interested in my friends.’ (Girl, 16 years)
One of the conclusions drawn from this study is that schools should pay more attention to the multiple relationships that determine an adolescent’s behaviour.
What was the study done by Katja Joronen and Paivi Astedt-Kurki (2005) using a qualitative content analysis interested in?
A Finnish study considered the role of the family in adolescents’ peer and school experiences.
What conclusions were drawn from the study done by Katja Joronen and Paivi Astedt-Kurki (2005) using a qualitative content analysis?
One of the conclusions drawn from this study is that schools should pay more attention to the multiple relationships that determine an adolescent’s behaviour.
What is one problem with qualitative data?
It is difficult to summarise.
Why is quantitative data better than qualitative data?
It can be readily summarised with measures of central tendency and measures of dispersion, and also with the use of graphs.
How is qualitative data summarised?
By identifying repeated themes in the material to be analysed.