Risk Management Flashcards

1
Q

lecture overview

R I Q M P H S F P

Really
irritating
queens
make
Penises
Have
small
foreskin
piercings
A

1) risk -vulnerability and assessement
2) indicators and confidence scales
3) quantifying impact
4) models- fault tree and example
5) protection goals
6) hazard identification
7) strategy comparisons
8) flood example
9) considerations in poilicy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

lecture overview letters

A

R I Q M P H S F P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

risk definition and key qu (2)

A

a probability of damage/danger/loss/injury or other adverse consequence

what? agents,pathways,receptors
Where/When? time space vulnerability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Vulnerability compnenets + who/when

A

Brooks 2003

a) biophysical vulnerability - propensity for agent to cause harm to receptor
b) social vulnerability -human factors that reduce receptor ability to cope with agent interactors

does vulnerability imply co responsability?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Assessment

A

vulnerability means need to assign responsability for management

done through assessment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

vulnerability to 1 risk

A

may reduce it for others - ie is enviro risk

also how do we take into account dif risks?

(drunk driving) / genetic medical disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Assessment questions (8)

A
what can go wrong?
When?
Likelihood?
Consequences?
Options?
Tradeoffs?
CBA models?
Legislation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what can we use for assessment (3)

A

evidence quality indicators
confidence scales
quantify impact
risk models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evidence quality indicators

quality rank) + indicators (5

A

can public trust government
look at qual of evidence on scale -
very low,low.moderate.high,very high=quality rank

theoretical basis
scientific method
auditability
calibration
objectivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

good evidence

A

wellestablished theory
best available practice
large sample + direct means
well documented to trace data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

bad evidence

A

crude specification
no rigour
no link back to data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Confidence scales + percentage and based on what

A

based on IPCC 2005- flossary of terms for climate change reports (how confident of term)

very low 0-5
low 5-33
moderate 33-67
high-67-95
very high 95-100
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Quantifying impact different ways (3)

A

direct market value - get for selling ie polluted water vs clean (difficult to play to ecosystem services)

hedonic pricing- relate to some market values ie if house near busy road less valuable as pollution

contingent valuation- WTP and WTA -willingness to pay/accept - problem = biased questions + subjective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Risk models - composition

A

1) Hazard identification - formal listing of hazards - risk matrices and top event
2) Assignment of probabilities - each of sequential events have probability- probability of top event is derived from sub events multiplication
3) consequence modelling - ie toxic damage estimated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what do models do?

A

produce a distribution of different outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Example model

A

FAULT TREE MODEL

series of events which together add up to make problem for example an invasive insect establishment by importing fruit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Fault tree model breakdown example for citrus fruit invested by pest

A
initiatiating event ( 60% harvested for export)
P1 = 5% infested
P2-40 escape port detection
P3 5% to infesrable areas
P4- 5% exposed to citrus
TOP EVENT - introduction of pest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Fault tree standards

A

Satandards exist for example acceptable quarantine risk is 99.8% safe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

each of th probabilities have certain degree of uncertainty so should

A

have distributions for each number and multiply distributions at mean and median for safe differ. Standard being determined by distribution would be better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Expert opinion use for standards?
pro=2
con=3

A

PROS - maximises flexibility if have broad expet range, maximises use of information

CONS- overconfident,opinions differ, how do determine “experts” - may be influenced by attitudes/ values

21
Q

example for expert reliability

A

ASPINALL’s Leaking DAM

experts had to look at likelihood of dam breaking and estimate time woul hold under different conditions

2 ways to judge responses

22
Q

2 ways APsinall DAm judges expert responses

A

combine all distributions and use mean

test experts with known cases to test how good they are and then weigh their reliability using these questions this is called cooke method

23
Q

COOKE METHOD

A

performance weighted solutions (better than equal weights)

24
Q

identifying protection goals

what consequences will yo accept wrt likelihood?

A

AUstralia OGTR

consequence accepted depends on likelihood

if highly unlikely accept intermediate consequence

but minor consequences only at likely

helps determine management levels

25
Q

likely

A

could occur under many circumstances

26
Q

minor consequence

A

“reversible health or enviro effect”

27
Q

Hazard identification -mosquito example

what is going to cause harm
will it come into contact with component of enviro that will allow this harm to occur?

A

pathways for exposure - biting (disease transmission-ingestion etc)

measuring exposure- disease incidence,bites,reaction - HGT?

28
Q

hazard comparison

A

do comparisons in lab between control and infective mozzie

a) individuals
b) population

Then compare response to hazard

control system- local convention/local field pop modified, SIT, ITM , IRS ?
helath indicators and nuiance indicators? more harm or not?

29
Q

hazard concern who determines

A

public and regulators –> consequences are relative to worst case (top event)

30
Q

limits of concern

A

assign weights to different dimensions
can be relative to enviro consequence
negligible, v low, low , moderate ,high, v high

31
Q

negligible

A

no measurable adverse impacts + some positive attributs

32
Q

low

A

occassional , restricted, limited reversible damage

33
Q

v low

A

minimal,localised,short term

34
Q

moderate

A

damage of limited severity + reversible i ntime

35
Q

high

A

extensive and enduring damage widespread and not readily reversible

36
Q

very high

A

loss at large scales,long time frames and not reversible

37
Q

strategies with what yo udo with risk (4)

A
terminate
mitigate
transfer
exploit
accept
38
Q

terminate

A

elimate risk source

39
Q

mitigate

A

preventative,corrective or directive

40
Q

transfer

A

insuurance,hybrid

41
Q

exploit

A

explore opportunities in the risk approach

42
Q

accept

A

make decisions to tolerate risk

43
Q

when considering and comparing strategies need to consider 5

A
econ
enviro
social
organisational capabilities
technical factors
44
Q

Case study Environmental Agency flood risk

what was risk and focal issue?

A

risk- suscepibility of flooding from river / sea without defences
likelihood issue as size less imprtant

45
Q

Flood risk assessment flood mpas

A

arease with 1 in 100 yr chanc of occurance or greater - river map

sea map - 1 in 200 yr

extreme risk is seen as 1 in 100 yr

46
Q

What happened? Future?

A

insurers backed away from these areas
now flood re launched in 2016 has secured multi billion reisurance programme to ocver properties built after jan 2009
transferring risk to unsurers

peremium based on tax band of property.

47
Q
past failures of flood - homes lost 
2007
2009
2012
2013
A

55,000
1,500
7,000
11,000

48
Q

in 2007 floods cost what?

A

3.2 BILLION pounds

49
Q

risk and policy considerations

A
gravity/magnitude
acceptable level - how and who decides
public outrage
trade-off- rewards?
tradeoff 1 risk vs anothe
individual or group at risk- bearers?
beneficiaries of risk
blame of responsability