Revision Families and Households Flashcards
What did Murdock define the family as?
A social group characterised by common residence, economic cooperation and reproduction. Including adults of both sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual relationship, and one more children.
What did Murdock see the family as?
A universal institution which was necessary for the smooth functioning and survival of any society.
Murdock and which family type suited him?
Extended (relations by blood or marriage from other generations and the siblings of parents) and nuclear (which consists of two generations, parents and immature offspring)
The comparison from Murdock on the Nayar..?
EVAL AGAINST HIS DEFINTION
1959 research by Gough found the NAYAR of southern India, wives did not live with the man they married, and instead had several visiting husbands. Didn’t live permanently. warriors arrive back to sleep with wife. Murdocks definition of this society did not possess a family since fathers did not live with their children.
Matrifocal families and Murdock comparison?
Where families in Caribbean, USA had a significant proportion of households not containing an adult male.
However, Gonzalez in 1970 found that the matrifocal family were a well-organised social group. The mothers often get strong support from female relatives, but dosent fit with an adult male.
What happens to Gay and Lesbian Families to Murdock definition of the family.
Legalised
Dosent conform, contains both sexes, same-sex relationship. Some societies don’t approve. However, 2005, UK, Civil partnerships legalised for gay and lesbian couples, more socially acceptable.
2014, same-sex marriage
Murdock and problem with common residence?
Husband and wife do not always cohabit, NAYAR
Murdock and problem with families containing adults of both sexes?
Lesbian and gay and matrifocal families do not conform
Murdock and problem with families containing one or more children?
Child-free couples can be seen as a family.
What did Gittens conclude in 1993?
concludes that there is no single family type that is found in all societies. not possible to have a definition which fits all societies.
The functionalist perspective on the family?
See society as an interrelated whole. Every institution in society performs one or more important functions. Help run smoothly like a well-oiled machine.
The universe functions of family told by Murdock?
- Sexual function - regulate sexual access and activity
- Reproductive function - survival of society
- Economic function - economic unit
- Educational function - stable society - socialised in society
Talcott Parsons - the basic irreducible functions of the family 1959 - 1965?
- Primary socialisation - could internalise norms and values of their society of
- Stabilisation of adult personalities - brings warmth and security offered by the nuclear family, husband coming home form work.
Talcott Parsons and the changes in the structure of the family to fit the needs of different types of societies?
Pre industrial times, extended family was norm.
Nuclear family developed in industrial society where it was necessary because:
1. Industry required a geographically mobile workforce.
2. Socially mobile workforce was also necessary. - extended families status was largely ascribed - oldest males had best jobs - nuclear family avoided this.
Criticisms of functionalism?
- Some societies don’t have traditional families
- Ignores ‘dark side’ abuse, assault
- Feminists argue men benefit more than women
- Outdated
- Postmodernists argue there are many viable alternatives
Why in capitalism was the proletariat exploited? Marx…
Was exploited by the bourgeoisie because they were not paid the full value of their work since the bourgeoisie kept some surplus value or profit.
Marxist Engels perspective on the family? (1884)
The family developed so that men could be certain of the paternity of children, with marriage allowing them to control women’s sexuality. Be confident of passing property and wealth to biological offspring.
Marxist Zaretsky perspective on the family? (1976)
The family as a prop to the capitalist system.
The unpaid domestic labour of housewives supports future generations of workers at no cost to capitalist employers.
Consuming commodities by capitalist businesses, helping the bourgeoisie to make profits. Comforting and alienating workers and helping them to carry on work.
Poulantzas Marxist perpective on the family? (1969)
sees the family as part if the superstructure of society. He describes it as part of the ideological state apparatus, which is controlled by capitalists and used to create values, attitudes and beliefs which support the capitalist system and the position of the ruling class.
Criticisms of Marxism?
- Feminists argue men (patriarchy)
- Zaretsky for over exaggerating, family can escape from alienating work since the family can also be characterised by cruel, neglect and violence.
- Some families anti capitalist - socialise children into being critical
- Outdated
- Functionalism
Greer in 2000?
Wives much more likely to have violent abuse. Single women generally happier than married..
Somerville? 2000
• much more choice to get married, and work
• there is greater equality within marriage
• Most women still value relationships with them.
Though she agrees that the inequalities need to be addressed through practical reforms.
Marxist Benston 1972?
Wives used to produce and tear cheap labour for employers - help husbands to carry on - childcare unpaid - no cost to employers…
Giddens 1992 plastic sexuality and confluent love?
- women kept their virginity until marriage
- plastic sexuality - more for pleasure
- love dependent relationships, little sense of duty