REVISION- ALTERNATIVES TO MAJORITARIAN DEMOCRACIES (FOR SOURCE D1) Flashcards
Why does the Westminister Model work? (MAJORITARIAN SYSTEM)
Works because:
- Overarching identity tied to the state
- Shared assumptions
1) Expectations of regular alternation in Govt.
2) Incentive to act as loyal opposition
“The essence of the Westminster model is the concentration of political power in the hands of the majority.” (Lijphart, 1982)
What are the problems with Majoritarian Systems?
- Biggest weakness in states with divisions (National,Religious,Linguistic,Cultural)
- Where groups have weak ties to the state
- Minority groups within a state can be permanently excluded from Govt. (E.g: Sri Lanka and the Tamil pop.)
What are the alternatives to Majoritarian Systems?
- Secession/Independence
- Devolution/Cantonisation
- Federalisation
- Consociationism
- Domination -> By Force
What is Secession/Independence?
- Allow regions or groups to form New States
e. g: N.Sudan and S.Sudan
What are the drawbacks to Secession?
-Continuing demands for secession:
N.Sudan and South disputing over middle of Sudan
- Can lead to violence:
India and Pakistan - This link between the nation and the state may cause ethnic cleansing
What is Devolution?
-The transfer or delegation of power to a lower level, especially by central government to local or regional administration.
What are some drawbacks to Devolution?
- Devolution causes a slippery slope: Fuelling calls for independence
What are Federal Systems?
A system of government in which sovereignty is shared between central and peripheral levels
- Strict separation of authority
- Codified constitution
- Judicial review
- Usually bicameral legislature
What are some benefits of Federalism?
- Warding off of external threats
- Governing large territory
- Good at dealing with ethnic and cultural diversity (Balancing minority interests: Canada)
What are some drawbacks of Federalism?
- Polarisation
- Ineffective decision-making
What is Consociationalism?
Based on Ljiphart’s work
Characterised by 4 main principles:
- Grand coalition/power-sharing executive
- Segmental autonomy
- Proportionality
- Minority veto
Elite level process – separate communities but to allow negotiation via politics
Classic cases – Belgium, Netherlands, Switzerland & Austria
What are some critiques to Consociationalism?
-No clear explanation as to how consociationalism lead to integration between sep communities
- Differing approaches to identity
Corporatist Approach: Identity fixed
Liberal Approach: Identity is malleable - Revised consociationalism lacks coherency: Changes too often (Academic Marketing)
- Lack of proven success? -
- Problems with deep divisions?