Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Psychology Flash Cards > Resharch Methods > Flashcards

Resharch Methods Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards AP® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

Name the 4 experimental methods

A
  1. Lab
  2. Field
  3. Natural
  4. Quasi
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lab experiment

A

Controlled study carried about in an artificial setting such as a university office

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lab experiment strengths ?

A

. Controlled so more reliable
. Fewer extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Lab experiment cons?

A

. Lacks ecological validity as its unrealistic
. Risk of demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Field experiment?

A

A controlled study carried out in a realistic setting – testing people where they would naturally be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Field experiment strengths?

A

. Controlled so more reliable and fewer extraneous variables
. Realistic setting so higher ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Field experiment weaknesses

A
  • Harder to control as many extraneous variables as in a lab
  • Less ethical (more deception)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Natural experiment

A

The researcher does not manipulate the independent variable. Instead, it is a naturally- occurring experience or behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Strengths of natural experiment

A

+ Total ecological validity as it has already happened
+ Can test things you couldn’t if you wanted to manipulate variables (e.g. trauma)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Weaknesses of natural experiment

A
  • Lacks reliability as there is no control or standardisation
  • Limited to the people who have the experience/behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Quasi experiment?

A

The researcher does not manipulate the independent variable instead its a naturally- occurring characteristic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Strengths of quasi experiment

A

+ Total ecological validity as it has already happened
+ Can test things you couldn’t if you wanted to manipulate variables (e.g. intelligence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Weaknesses of quasi experiment

A
  • Lacks reliability as there is no control or standardisation
  • Limited to the people who have the characteristic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 non experimental methods

A

. Questionnaire (self report technique)
. Interview ( self report technique)
. Observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Questionnaires?

A

Participants are given a set of written questions, either ‘closed’, ‘open’ or ‘scale’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Strengths of questionnaire

A

+ Quick (can be sent to thousands instantly via email)
+ Easy to quantify and analyse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Weaknesses of questionnaire?

A
  • Not a good method for detailed info
  • Can’t build a rapport with the participant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Interviews?

A

Live questioning (usually face:face). Could be structured (set questions) or unstructured (conversational)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Interviews strengths?

A

+ Can build a rapport and make them feel at ease
+ Can ask follow-up questions for detail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Interviews weaknesses

A
  • Higher risk of social desirability bias as it is
    face:face
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Observations?

A

Watching the actual behaviour of participants. Controlled vs. naturalistic; overt vs. covert; participant vs. non-participant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Strengths of observations?

A

+ Observe the actual behaviour so lower risk of demand characteristics/social desirability bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Weaknesses of observations?

A
  • Cannot observe a person’s thoughts
  • Could be affected by researcher bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

4 more non experimental methods

A

. Content analysis
. Case study
. Correctional analysis
. meta analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Content analysis?

A

Quantitative analysis of qualitative data. Researchers identify specific behavioural categories and then tally their occurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Strengths of content analysis

A

+ Quantitative, meaning more reliable
+ Can use secondary data with high ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Weaknesses of content analysis

A
  • By quantifying the data you lose its meaning, so
    conclusions are less valid
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Case study’s ?

A

An in-depth study of one person or a small number of people, usually those who have a unique characteristic or experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Case study strengths

A

+ Able to ‘triangulate’ and study the person using multiple methods + In-depth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Case study’s weaknesses

A
  • Lacks reliability as it is naturally-occurring
  • Risk of subjectivity over time
31
Q

Correctional analysis

A

Statistical analysis of two or more co variables to see id there is a realsonships between them often secondary data

32
Q

Correlational analysis strength

A

+ Useful for identifying potential areas of research

33
Q

Correlational analysis weakness

A
  • Cannot identify causation, only correlation
34
Q

Meta analysis?

A

Compiling data from multiple studies that investigate the same behaviour to create overall conclusions

35
Q

Strengths of meta analysis

A

+ Eliminates individual researcher bias
+ Large sample sizes
+ Can cover a range of methods

36
Q

Weakness of meta analysis

A
  • Secondary data so cannot confirm all studies were standardised
37
Q

Three types of hypotheses

A

. Directional
. Non directional
. Null

38
Q

When should you only use a directional hypothesis

A

If the is published past research .

39
Q

Directional hypothesis?

A

Predicting that there will be a difference between conditions/correlation between variables, and stating the direction.

40
Q

Non directional hypothesis ?

A

Predicting that there will be a difference between conditions/correlation between variables, but not stating the direction

41
Q

Null hypothesis

A

Predicting that there will be no difference/correlation.

42
Q

Name the 5 sampling methods.

A
  1. Random
  2. Opportunity
  3. Volunteer
  4. Systematic
  5. Stratified
43
Q

Random sampling?

A

Number people in your sampling frame; use a random number generator to decide who should take part.

44
Q

Strength of Random sampling?

A

+ No investigator effects in deciding who to choose

45
Q

Weaknesses of random sampling?

A
  • Could be randomly unrepresentative
  • Needs a sampling frame
46
Q

Opportunity sampling

A

Choosing people who are in the right place at the right time (e.g. select people who are on the high street)

47
Q

Strengths of sampling methods?

A

+ Easier to carry out since the participants are already available

48
Q

Weaknesses of opportunity sampling

A
  • Risk of investigator effects in choosing who they like
  • Likely to be unrepresentative
49
Q

Volunteer sampling

A

Place an advertisement and participants self-select

50
Q

Volunteer sampling strengths

A

+ Ensures participants will be motivated
+ More ethical as participants know they are being tested

51
Q

Weaknesses of volunteer sampling?

A
  • High risk of being unrepresentative
  • Hard to incentivise people to take part
52
Q

Systematic sampling ?

A

Gather a sampling frame of people; choose every nth person (n = sampling frame size/sample size)

53
Q

Systematic sampling strengths?

A

+ If you list people in order (e.g. by age), you can ensure a diverse sample
+ No investigator effects

54
Q

Systematic strengths weaknesses

A
  • Needs a sampling frame
55
Q

Stratified sampling?

A

Calculate proportions in the population (e.g. 60:40 Male:Female). Randomly select proportionate numbers for your sample

56
Q

Strengths of stratified sampling

A

+ Most representative of the population
+ No investigator effects

57
Q

Weaknesses of stratified sampling?

A
  • Needs a sampling frame
  • Might not be able to gather
    the data you would like
58
Q

Name three experimental designs?

A

. Independent groups
. Repeated measures
. Matched pairs

59
Q

Independent groups?

A

Each participant only takes part in one condition of the independent vat level

60
Q

Strengths of independent groups?

A

+ low risk of demand characteristics
+ no order effects

61
Q

Weaknesses of independent groups

A
  • participant variables mean it is hard to compare groups
  • requires more participants
62
Q

Repeated measures?

A

Each participant takes part in all conditions of the independent variable

63
Q

Strength of repeated measures?

A

+ easier to compare performance on conditions validity because they are the same people. Both times

64
Q

Weaknesses of repeated measures ?

A
  • high risk of demand charactertics
  • high risk of Order effects
65
Q

Matched pairs ?

A

Each participant only takes part in one conduction however the researcher tests partipents and sorts them into equal groups

66
Q

Matched pairs strengths?

A

+ no order effects and limited demand characteristics.
+ reduces the effect of participant variables

67
Q

Weaknesses of matched pairs?

A
  • often impossible/impractical to match and sort paratipents beforehand
  • still risk of participant variables
68
Q

Independent variable ?

A

The difference between the conditions its the thing you change

69
Q

Dependant variable?

A

The variable that you measure

70
Q

Control variable

A

Anything you keep the same in all conditions like the same room or time of day

71
Q

Extraneous variables ?

A

Anything other than the independent variable that has an affect on the dependant variable

Situational - any changes in the environment tests etc . Between conditions
Partipant - differences between participants in condition 1 and 2 that affect dependant variable

72
Q

Confounding variables?

A

A third variable within a correlation that affects both the other two variables consistently

73
Q

What is counterbalancing ?

A

During a repeated measures design half of the participants carry out condition A first and then B; the other half carry out B first and then A. This helps to eliminate order effects by cancelling it out.

74
Q

Standerdarstatidon

A

Keeping everything the same from one condition to the next. For example, writing down your instructions for participants instead of trying to be consistent in how you explain the study to them.

Psychology Flash Cards (12 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions