Attachemnts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Type A attachment

A

Insecure avoidant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Type B attachment

A

Secure attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Type C attachment

A

Insecure resistant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Insecure avoidant ?

A

willing to explore, low stranger and separation anxiety, avoids contact at reunion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Secure attachment?

A

Infants use the mother as a home base from which to explore when all is well, but seek physical comfort and consolation from her if frightened or threatened, on mothers return they are happy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Insecure resistant

A

clings to caregiver, not willing to explore get distressed when mother leaves they are angry and upset on reunion they do not like stranger and cry a lot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Schaffer’s stage of attachment 1 -

A

Anti social stage - first few weeks of infants life babies respond in the same way to humans and objects they have no sense of life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Schaffer’s stage of attachment 2 -

A

Indiscriminate attachment 2-6 months babies have per grace for families people no strangers and get separation anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Schaffer’s stage of attachment 3 -

A

Specific attachment - 7 months one primary attachment figure 65 % with mother and 3 % with father (27 % had both)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Schaffers stage of attachment 4 -

A

From 8 months plus by 12 months most babies from several attachments for example 75 % have attachments with father’s by 18 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Key study for stages of attachment

A

Schaffer and Emerson 1964

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Procedure of Schaffer and Emerson 1964

A

Longitudinal study, 60 Glaswegian babies observed at home (largely) by mothers, recorded infants separation distress and stranger anxiety in diary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Findings of Schaffer and Emerson 1964

A

1) the four stages of attachment 2) ‘Sensitive responsiveness’ - attachment was to caregiver who responded appropriately to signals, not the one who fed them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pros of Schaffer and Emerson 1964

A
  1. The was high external validity - no demand characteristics as babies and parents did observing so behaviour was natural
  2. It’s a longitudinal and repeated measures no participant variables so high internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cons Schaffer and Emerson 1964

A
  1. It’s difficult to asses multiple attachments, infants distress does not necessarily signify attachment
  2. It’s hard to study asocial babies, poor coordination so may just seem asocial
  3. Conflicting evidence, multiple attachments easier in collectives cultures i.e findings are not universal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Key study on role of the farther

A

Grossman

17
Q

Grossman procedure

A

Longitudinal study following 44 families from infancy to 16 years old. Assessed quality of attachments at 6, 10, 16.

18
Q

Grossman findings?

A

Fathers’ play sensitivity is a better predictor of the child’s long-term attachment representation than the early infant–father security of attachment.

19
Q

How many cases are father’s the primary care giver?

A

3%

20
Q

Findings on quality of fathers care?

A

The quality of the father’s play with the infants is liked yo quality of later attachments therefore father’s have different role to mothers (Grossman)

21
Q

Role of the farther against points?

A
  1. No distinct role - children without father’s are no different so secondary attachment may be unimportant.
  2. Fathers are not made to be primary attachment could argue that hormone predispose women to be nurturing the fore the primary caregiver \
  3. Schaffer and Emerson found that gender and learning were unimportant in forming attachment, responsiveness to the child’s needs was the most important.
22
Q

Role of the farther positive points?

A
  1. Economic implications - Fathers have important (but different) role so may want to stay home longer (Grossman). Mothers may feel freer to return to work and leave fathers at home (Field).
23
Q

Caregiver infant interactions - interactional synchrony?

A

Baby and mother mirror actions and emotions almost at the same time.
• Observations of adult and baby show synchrony at two weeks old (Meltzoff and Moore)
• Importantforattachment–Highersynchronylinkedto better quality attachment (Isabella et al)

24
Q

Caregiver infant interactions - reciprocity ?

A

One person responds to the other, a two- way/mutual process (like a conversation), 3 months+
• Baby takes an active role – can initiate interactions and ‘take turns’. Each elicits a response from the other.

25
Q

Care giver infant interactions study ?

A

Melzoff and Moore 1977

26
Q

Meltzoff and Moore 1977 procedure ?

A

Adult displayed one of three facial expressions, e.g. tongue protrusion. Child and adult filmed from multiple angles. Watched in slow motion

27
Q

Meltzoff and Moore 1977 findings ?

A

Clear association between expression and action of the child. High inter-observer reliability.