Research Methods Key Words Flashcards
Experimental method
Involves the manipulation of independent variable to measure the effect on the dependent variable. Experiments may be laboratory, field, natural or quasi
Aim
A general statement of what the researcher intends to investigate; the purpose of the study
Hypothesis
A clear, precise testable statement that states the relationship between the variables to be investigated. Stated at the outset of any study
Directional hypothesis
States the direction of the difference or relationship between the variables
Non-directional hypothesis
Does not state the direction of the difference or relationship between the variables
Variables
Any ‘thing’ that can vary or change within an investigation. Variables are generally used in experiments yo determine if changes in one thing result in changes to another
Independent variable
Some aspect of the experimental situation that is manipulated by the researcher - or changes naturally - so the effect on the DV can be measured
Dependent variable
The variable that is measured by the researcher. Any effect on the DV should be caused by the change in the IV
Operationalisation
Clearly defining variables in terms of how they can be measured
Theory
A collection of general principles used to explain specific observations and facts
Extraneous variable
Any variable, other than the IV, that may have an effect on the DV if it is not controlled. EV’s are essentially nuisance variables that do not vary systematically with the IV
Confounding variables
Any variable, other than the IV, that may have affected the DV so we cannot be sure of the true source of changes to the DV. Confounding variables vary systematically with the IV.
Demand characteristics
Any cue from the researcher or from the research situation that may be interpreted by participants as revealing the purpose of the investigation. This may lead to a participant changing their behaviour within the research situation
Investigator effects
Any effect of the investigator’s behaviour on the research outcome. This may include everything from the design of the study to the selection of, and the interaction with, participants during the research process
Randomisation
The use of chance in order to control the effects of bias when designing materials and deciding the order of conditions
Standardisation
Using exactly the same formalised procedures and instructions for all participants in a research study
Participant reactivity
The tendency for participants to react to cues from the researcher or the research environment
Counterbalancing
An attempt to control for the effects of order in a repeated measures design: half of the participants experience the conditions in one order, and the other half in the opposite order
Experimental design
The different ways in which the testing of participants can be organised in relation to the experimental conditions
Independent groups design
Participants are allocated to different groups where each group represents one experimental condition
Repeated measures
All participants take part in all conditions of the experiment
Matched pairs design
Pairs of participants are first matched on some variables that may affect the DV. Then one member of the pair is assigned to Condition A and the other to Condition B
Random allocation
An attempt to control for participant variables in an independent groups design which ensures that each participant has the same chance of being in one condition as any other
Participant variables
Characteristics of individual participants (such as age and intelligence) that might influence the outcome of a study
Order effects
In a repeated measures design, a confounding variable arising from the order which conditions are presented, e.g. practice effect or boredom effect
Laboratory (Lab) experiment
An experiment that takes place in a controlled environment within which the researcher manipulates the IV and records the effect on DV, whilst maintaining strict control of extraneous variables
Field experiment
An experiment that takes place in a natural setting within the researcher manipulates the IV and records the effect on the DV
Natural experiment
An experiment where the change in the IV is not brought about by the researcher but would have happened even if the researcher had not been there. The researcher records the effect on the DV
Quasi-experiment
A study that is almost an experiment but lacks key ingredients. The IV has not been determined by anyone (the researcher or any other person) - the ‘variables’ simply exist, such as being old or young
Population
A group of people who are the focus of the researcher’s interest, from which a smaller sample is drawn
Sample
A group of people who take part in a research investigation. The sample is drawn from a target population and is presumed to be representative of that population
Sampling techniques
The method used to select people from the population
Bias
In the context of sampling, when certain groups may be over or under-represented within the sample selected. For instance, there may be too many younger people or too many people of one ethnic origin in a sample. This limits the extent to which generalisations can be made to the target population
Generalisation
The extent to which findings and conclusions from a particular investigation can be broadly applied to the population. This is made possible if the sample of participants is representative of the population
Random sample
All members of the target population have an equal chance of being selected
Stratified sample
The composition of the sample reflects the proportions of people in certain sub-groups within the target or wider population
Opportunity sample
Where researchers select anyone who happens to be willing and available
Volunteer sample
Participants selecting themselves to be part of the research
Ethical issues
These arise when a conflict exists between the rights of participants in research studies and the goals of research to produce authentic, valid and worthwhile data
BPS code of ethics
A quasi-legal document produced by the British Psychological Society that instructs psychologists in the UK about what is an is not acceptable when dealing with participants. It is built around 4 major principles: respect, competence, responsibility and integrity
Informed consent
Making participants aware of the aims of research, the procedures, their rights (including the right to withdraw)
Deception
Deliberately withholding information from participants at any stage of the investigation
Protection from harm
Ensuring the participants aren’t placed at any more risk than they would in their daily lives
Privacy
TPersonal infroamtion that participants can control about theimselves
Confidentiality
The right to have any personal data protected if privacy is invaded
Debriefing
Where participants are made aware of the true aims of an investigation after the study
Pilot study
A small-scale version of an investigation that takes place before the real investigation is conducted. The aim is to check that procedures, materials, measuring scales etc, work and to allow the researcher to make changes or modifications if necessary
Single-blind procedure
When participants are not informed about the aim of research at the beginning of the study
Double-bind procedure
Where neither the participants nor the researcher is aware of the aim of the study
Naturalistic observation
Watching and recording behaviour in the setting within which it would normally occur
Controlled observation
Watching and recording behaviour within a structured environment i.e. one where some variables are managed
Covert observation
Participants’ behaviour is watched and recorded without their knowledge or consent
Over observation
Participants’ behaviour is watched and recorded with their knowledge and consent
Participant observation
The researcher becomes a member of the group whose behaviour he/she is watching and recording