Research methods Flashcards
Outline what a self-report is.
methods of gathering data where participants provide information about themselves without interference from the experimenter
Two types of self-reports.
interviews and questionnaires
Types of questions used in self-reports
open-ended - They do not have fixed responses, and so they allow the participant to answer however he/she wishes.
closed questions- restrict the participant to a predetermined set of responses and generate quantitative data.
Structured vs unstructured interview.
Structured interview- questions are pre-determined. Interviewer cannot go off topic and ask to for the ppt to elaborate.
Unstructured interview- interviewer has some idea of the questions they will ask but can make up questions in the interview to ask participant.
Outline what an interview is
A method of data collection whereby an interviewer asks questions either face to face, video call or on the phone. Verbally asking and answering questions.
Strengths of using questionnaires.
- once designed, easy to administer & analyse
- large amounts of info can be collected within a short period
- ppts feel comfortable answering- confidential
Limitations of using questionnaires.
- problems with wording- ppts may interpret questions in different ways.
Researcher can also infer answers incorrectly to fit their investigation (researcher bias) - can only be given to those who can read or write
- can be lead down a rabbit hole by vast answers (open ended questions)
Strengths of using interviews.
- flexibility; complex issues can be explored which may not be possible via other RM’s
- tackling sensitive topics; can investigate topics that are private or personal
Limitations of using interviews.
- interpreting data; qualitative data can be difficult to analyse and may be bias from interviewer. (researcher bias)
- interviewers presence may effect response from ppt- demand characteristics.
Validity issues with self-reports.
- social desirability bias; ppts alter the their response to present themselves in the best way possible
- internal validity; leading or ambiguous questions can affect ppts responses
- interviewer bias; how the researchers behaviour could influence ppts responses
- content validity; do the questions actually measure what is intended to be measured
Assessing and improving validity in self reports.
- using face validity; does the questionnaire look like it’s measuring the right thing.
- concurrent validity; comparing new questionnaire results with results from previous established tool on the same topic. Ppts complete both at the same time and results are compared.
Reliability issues with self-reports.
- External reliability; consistency of results obtained, ppts should be able to take questionnaire again & get similar results.
- Internal reliability; extent to which questions are consistent with each other.
- Test-retest method; asking ppts to retake the test at a later date and comparing results.
What is correlation?
relationship between two or more variables and how one affects the other.
Types of correlation.
- Positive correlation; As one variable increases the other increases.
- Negative correlation; As one variable increases the other decreases.
Explain how to measure the correlation.
Psychologists use a stats test called correlation coefficient to measure the strength. Can range between -1.0 & +1.0.
The number represents the strength of the relationship between the variables, nearer the number is to +1.0 or -1.0 the stronger the relationship.
What is validity?
measure of the truth; does the test measure what it says it’s measuring. If you can generalise the results then it is valid.
What is internal validity?
how much the findings of the DV actually has to do with the manipulation of IV and not other factors (like EVS)
What is external validity?
weather the results can be generalised beyond the study (ecological validity and population validity)
What is population validity?
can the results be generalised to the population
What is ecological validity?
can the results be generalised to real life and real world. to be high then both the setting and the task which the study takes place in must have mundane realise. (similar to ‘everyday life’)
What is face validity?
an independent expert looks at the measure being used and asses weather the study is measuring what it intends to (just by looking at it) (judging a book by its cover)
What is concurrent validity?
comparing the new procedure with a similar procedure that has been done before, where validity has already been established. If the scores correlate as a strong positive correlation (+0.80) then the test is deemed to b e valid.
What is temporal validity?
weather results from a study or a theory remain the true & valid over a period of time. (weather the results can still be generalised to a modern day society)
Improving validity- experiments.
- to ensure that IV has an affect on DV and not EV’s, a control group is used.
- control of variables is needed through standardisation; in order to reduce investigator effects and demand characteristics. Single-blind and double-blind procedures can be used.
Improving validity- questionnaires.
- a lie scale within the results is used within the questionnaires and psychological tests. These are additional questions which assess how truthful someone is in their answers, helps control social desirability bias.
- anonymity can encourage truthfulness, increases validity.
Improving validity- observations.
- behaviour categories which have broad, ambiguous or overlap may reduce validity, so they must be clear and operationalised.
Improving validity- qualitative methods.
- interpretative validity needs to be demonstrated. the researcher has to show that their interpretation matches the ppts reality, using direct quotes on their report.
- gathering evidence from from multiple sources (family/friends, diary entries and observations) can strengthen case studies & interviews because interpretation can be validated, this process is called triangulation.
What is reliability?
making sure the results and the tests are consistent (if the experiment was to be repeated multiple times, would the results be the same each time)
Assessing reliability- Test re-test method
- re-administering the same test to the same people in the same conditions but on different occasions. (results will be the same if test is reliable)
- occasion that the tests are administered must not be too far away from one another so that answers completely change but not to close together that ptps remember the answers.
Assessing reliability- Inter-Observer reliability
- relevant to observational methods
-different researches must be able to interpret data in the same and come to the same conclusion in order for it to be reliable - using behavioural categories
Improving reliability- Questionnaires
- if a low correlation is produced, some questions may need to be removed or rewritten
Improving reliability- Interviews
- unstructured interviews have low reliability
- use same interviewer where possible
Improving reliability- Experiments
- instructions need to be standardised
- Ev’s controlled as much as possible
Improving reliability- Observations
- Behavioural categories need to be operationalised, must be measurable and self-evident
- using more than one observer (interobserver reliability)
What is a lab experiment?
- controlled conditions
- manipulates IV
- measures DV
What is a field experiment?
- natural conditions (ppt’s in natural environment)
- manipulates the IV
- measures the DV
What is a natural experiment?
- natural conditions (naturally occurring, something is already happening)
- IV naturally occurring
- measures the DV
What is a quasi experiment?
- controlled OR natural conditions
- IV is the difference between people (individual differences)
- measures the DV
What is an independent variable?
- manipulated by the researcher to test effects on another variable
What is a dependent variable?
- measured by researchers to see how to see how it’s been affected DV
What are extraneous variables?
- extra variables which are controlled to prevent effect on DV
What are cofounding variables?
- type of EV which acts as an IV; systematically affects all ppt’s in the same way, altering the DV.