Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Brain and Cognition > Research Methods > Flashcards

Research Methods Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
The Brain flashcards
1
Q

the belmond report 3 principles

A
  • respect: informed consent, special groups protection
  • justice: right balance between the people that benefit from the research and the people that participate in it
  • beneficience: participants should be protected from harm and ensured well being. ook confidentiality hoort hierbij.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

APA 5 general principles

A
  • respect
  • beneficience
  • justice
  • fidelity and responsibility (trust, professional)
  • integrity (accurate info, honest)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

deception through omission

A

witholding info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

deception through comission

A

lying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

difference data fabrication and data falsification

A
  • Data fabrication: Inventing data to fit the hypothesis
  • Data falsification: Influencing a study’s results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3Rs from animal research

A

replacement (liever een andere methode), refinement (minste distress), reduction (zo min als mogelijk dieren)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

interaction effects

A

when the original independent variable depends on the level of another independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

spreading interaction

A

an interaction between two independent variables “only occurs when..”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

moderator

A

independent variable that changes the relationship between the independent and dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

factorial design 2 effects

A

main and interaction effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

interaction effects wanneer ?

A

als de lijnen parallel zijn: GEEN interactie effect. anders wel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

factorial variations

A
  1. Independent-groups factorial designs: Both independent variables are studies as independent groups (E.g.: in a 2×2 factorial design, there are four different groups of participants in the experiment)
  2. Within-groups factorial designs: Both independent variables are manipulated as within-groups (E.g.: in a 2×2 factorial design, there is only one group of participants, but they participate in all four combinations of the design)
  3. Mixed factorial designs: One independent variable is manipulated as independent-groups, and the other is manipulated as within-groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

three way design

A
  • Results in three possible main effects
  • Results in three possible two-way interactions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

three way interaction

A

Three-way-interactions: A two-way interaction that depends on the level of the third independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

obscuring factor

A

hierdoor kan je geen relatie zien tussen independent and dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

internal validity

A

zijn er andere factoren die een rol spelen?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

design confound

A

andere explanation omdat het studie design gewoon niet goed is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

selection effects

A

the participant groups are systematically different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

order effects

A

the order in which the interventions are presented lead to differences: participants get tired etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

maturation threat

A

spontaneous remission (behaviour just changes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

history threat

A

a factor unrelated to the study influences the outcome for the whole group (COVID)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

regression to the mean

A

when a group has an extreme value as mean, it is most definitely going to be less the next time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

attrition threat

A

drop out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

testing threat

A

participants scores change when they take a test multiple times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

instrumentation threat

A

the instrument changes -> measures differently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

observer bias

A

researchers expectation have influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

demand characteristics

A

participant knows what the study is about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

null effect

A

gewoon geen effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

between group obscuring factors

A
  • weak manipulation -> door slechte study design geen goede manipulatie (manipulation check!)
  • insensitive measures (door slechte measures kan je geen verschil meten tussen de groepen)
    (- ceiling effect: all scores clustered at the end, te makkelijk)
  • floor effect: all scores clustered at the bottom, te moeilijk)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

dus obscuring factors van verschillen zijn …

A

within group issues. de grafieken liggen dan verder uit elkaar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

within group issues of obscuring factors

A
  • Noise: Unsystematic variability
  • Measurement error: A human or instrument factor that can inflate or deflate a person’s true score on the dependent variable
  • Individual differences (use within group design to solve this, or more participants)
  • Situational noise: External distractions (control wat je kan controleren, anders randomiseren)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

strengths of within groups

A

control for individual differences
fewer participants needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

strength of between group design with more than one independent variable

A
  • two for the price of one
  • you can study interaction effects

maar (-) wel 2x zoveel participanten nodig.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

hoe kan je zien of er een 3 way interactie is

A

als de twee grafieken hetzelfde zijn voor verschillende locaties bijvoorbeeld -> dan geen interactie effect. als ze ander zijn is er wel een interactieeffect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

participant variables

A

variables that you do not manipulate. these are also called additional independent variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

mixed factorial design

A

manipulate one independent variable between subjects and another within subjects.

For example, a researcher might choose to treat cell phone use as a within-subjects factor by testing the same participants both while using a cell phone and while not using a cell phone (while counterbalancing the order of these two conditions). But he or she might choose to treat time of day as a between-subjects factor by testing each participant either during the day or during the night (perhaps because this only requires them to come in for testing once). Thus each participant in this mixed design would be tested in two of the four conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

within-group design

A

pretest -> intervention -> posttest. in the same group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

voorbeeld van regression to the mean

A

mensen die zich depressief voelen zullen zich de volgende keer waarschijnlijk minder depressief voelen, aangezien ze zich aanmelden voor therapie op hun laagste punt. daardoor wss beter de next measurement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

mixed factorial design

A

pretest -> intervention -> posttest
pretest ———————–> posttest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

non-specific effects

A

effects not due to the treatment, but due to the expectation of being treated (bijvoorbeeld meer gaan sporten door motivatie therapie)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

wat is een oplossing voor non-specific effects

A

mixed factorial design with control group on a waitlist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

differences non-specific effects and placebo effect

A

non-specific: differences because you think you will be treated
placebo: because you are being treated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

hoe doen ze vaak control condition bij psychological interventions

A

positive control group: kijken of de interventie beter is dan de traditionele interventie.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

difference observer effect and observer bias

A

Observer bias: The researcher may see differences between the conditions that are not actually there

Observer effect: The researcher may treat participants differently depending on the condition they’re in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

demand characteristics

A

The participant may have the tendency to behave according to the research hypothesis

46
Q

hoe non-specific effects meten

A

door waiting list controls met controls te vergelijken

47
Q

hoe meet je placebo effect

A

negative controls vs waitlist control

48
Q

attrition

A

drop out, problematic if it is in one condition

49
Q

testing

A

the effect of being tested twice (oplossing: control group of alleen posttest).

50
Q

instrumentation

A

door instrumenten. oplossing: control group of alleen posttest.

51
Q

small n reasons

A
  • rare condition
  • homogenous population (fridges)
  • everyone has different symptoms -> everyone is a new experiment
  • you need to know within-subject differences for psychological disorders.
52
Q

small n vs large n

A

small n = differences between individuals. large n is differences within population

53
Q

3 small n designs

A
  • stable baseline design
  • reversal design
  • multiple baseline design
54
Q

stable baseline design

A

[M1 M2 M3] T [M4 M5 M6]

55
Q

stable baseline design waar controleer je voor en waar niet voor

A
  • Solves the measurement problem
  • Accurate estimate of individual parameter
  • Controls for some internal validity threats
  • Maturation
  • History
  • Non-specific effect
  • Regression to the mean

niet: placebo of non-specific effects?

56
Q

reversal design

A

you run consecutive sessions of the same condition until stable, and then you switch to another condition. if the behaviour differs between control and testing phase, the effect can be attributed to the treatment.

57
Q

multiple baseline design

A

study the effect of the intervention on multiple variables.

58
Q

when quasi experiment

A

if experiment is…

unethical
unpractical
unnatural
impossible

59
Q

quasiexperiment kenmerken

A

geen randomisatie, en niet dubbelblind. maar een groep deelnemers die interventie ondergaat wordt vergeleken met een groep die geen interventie ondergaat. the manipulation is an already scheduled event, therefore the researcher is not in control (bv plastische chirurgie).

60
Q

power =

A

rejecting the H0 when it is indeed not the correct hypothesis.

61
Q

difference substantive and statistical hypothesis

A

sustantive: hypothesis about how the world works.
statistical: statement about a population parameter

62
Q

reject H0 if..

A

your data is not likely if H0 is true

63
Q

not reject H0 if

A

your data is likely if H0 is true

64
Q

p-value

A

probability of these or more extreme results if H0 is true

65
Q

test statistic

A

how far the point estimate falls from the parameter value in the null hypothesis

66
Q

p-value bij two tailed test

A

the probability on these or extremER results if the H0 is true

67
Q

proportion assumptions

A
  • Variable is categorical
  • Data are obtained using randomization (random sample or random assignment)
  • Sampling distribution of proportion is normal if np ≥ 15 and n(1-p) ≥ 15
68
Q

p-value bij <

A

gewoon zo

69
Q

p-value bij >

A

1- …

70
Q

*
Conclusions
from a two sided significance test will agree with
conclusions drawn from a confidence interval
*
e.g.,: a significance test with a significance level of 0.05 will produce
the same conclusions as a 95% confidence interval
*
e.g.,: a
significance test with a significance level of 0.01 will produce
the same conclusions as a 99% confidence interval

A

oke

71
Q

type 1 error

A

H0 gets rejected when it is right

72
Q

type II error

A

H0 does not get rejected when it is false

73
Q

power =

A

1- type 2 error

74
Q

wat doe je bij het vergelijken van 2 verschillende groepen obv means

A

H0 : u1 - u2 = 0
Ha: u1-u2 =/= 0

75
Q

standard error =

A

=s = the estimated standard deviation of the sampling distribution

76
Q

df with two independent groups

A

is we can assume that s1=s2; then df = n1 + n2 - 2

77
Q

hoe t value krijgen uit df

A

t.inv

78
Q

95% CI bij twee groepen =

A

x1 - x2 +- t0,025*se

79
Q

a 95% CI means that …

A

that in the long run,
95% of your confidence intervals will include the true parameter value

80
Q

observational study

A

compare the results of one group to a standard

81
Q

a sampling distribution for 2 proportions is normal when….

A

n 1 p 1 ≥ 10 and n 1 (1 p 1 ) ≥ 10 in group 1 and if n 2 p 2 ≥ 10 and n 2 (1 p 2 ) ≥ 10 in group 2

82
Q

a sampling distribution for 2 proportions is normal when….

A

n 1 p 1 ≥ 10 and n 1 (1 p 1 ) ≥ 10 in group 1 and if n 2 p 2 ≥ 10 and n 2 (1 p 2 ) ≥ 10 in group 2

83
Q

dus het verschil tussen 1 proportion en 2 proportions between independent groups:

A

de assumptie over normale verdeling:
1 proportion = normally distributed if np > 15
2 proportions = normally distributed if n1p1 > 10
(3 for two sided test: n*p >5)

(two proportions has a smaller necessary assumption than 1)

84
Q

if the interval contains 0…

A

the proportions/means do not differ significantly

85
Q

assumptions for two proportions in 2 sided test

A

n*p => 5!

86
Q

hoe bereken je ^p voor 2 proporties

A

= overall passed/n1 + n2

87
Q

𝑥̅𝑑 berekenen: in welke sample en hoe?

A

in matche-pairs of repeated measures.
alle scores van elkaar aftrekken en daar het gemiddelde van nemen (x1 - x2 etc).

88
Q

wat is n bij dependent samples

A

aantal paren!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

89
Q

wanneer mcnemar’s test

A

bij dependent samples: proportions

90
Q

assumptions of mc nemars test

A
  • categorical variables
  • the sum of the frequencies is at least 30

fomule -> z score -> p value

91
Q

wat te doen bij 2 categorical variables…

A

contingency table!

92
Q

conditional proportion

A

the proportion of the response variable, for one level of the explanatory variable

93
Q

what is independence for conditional proportions

A

independence: a response variable is independent of the explanatory variable (no association!) if the conditional proportions are the same.

94
Q

what is dependence for conditional proportions

A

dependence: a response variable is dependent of the explanatory variable (association) if the conditional proportions are different

95
Q

assumptions for when both variables are categorical: strength of assocication

A
  • categorical
  • random
  • each cell has 5 expected counts
96
Q

hypotheses for 2 categorical variables: strength of association

A

H0: the variables are independent
Ha: the variables are dependent

97
Q

what does the H0 of cat ass imply?

A

that P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B) (want multiplication rule for independent H0!) events.

If H0 is true, then P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B)

98
Q

table maken expected by H0

A
  1. proportions normaal aan de RANDEN (deel/totaal!)
  2. middelste cellen: rand x rand
  3. alle getallen x n -> zodat je de expected frequencies hebt ipv proportions.
    (assumption: if any of these variables is < 5, the test should not be performed).

dus….

expected frequency = (row total x column total)/total n

99
Q

chi square test voor…

A

determining how much the observed and expected values differentiate from each other.

100
Q

x2 distribution

A
  • always positive
  • df = (rows -1) *(columns -1)
  • mean = df
  • two sided always
  • large x2 = evidence against independence = H0 is rejected (large x2 = association likely)
101
Q

hoe van p value naar x2 value

A

chisq.inv(0,95;df)

102
Q

hoe van x2 naar p value

A

chisq.dist (voor links), 1-chisq.dist (voor rechts) -> automatisch voor two sided, dus nooit x2!

103
Q

difference between x2 and statistical test

A

large x2 implies strong evidence against H0, pvalue says nothing about the size/strongness of association

104
Q

two measures for strength of association

A
  1. difference of the conditional proportions between treatment and control group
  2. relative risk: ratio of conditional proportions
105
Q

bij categorical, wanneer gebruik je wat?

A

2x2 rows: je kan z score gebruiken
meer dan 2 rows: chi square test gebruiken!

106
Q

als je de z score gebruikt voor tabel, hoe doe je dit met de proporties berekenen?

A

^p = aantal successen/totaal n
^p1 = aantal successen ene groep / totaal n
^p2 = aantal sucessen andere groep / totaal n

107
Q

x2 distribution is eigenlijk…

A

sampling distribution under H0

108
Q

welke waarde vul je hier in bij de chisq.inv(x;df)

A

probability = 0,95!!!! niet 0.05!!!!

109
Q

hoe bereken je population proportions

A

deel/row total

110
Q

HOE KOM JE BIJ DE T SCORE VOOR T0,025

A

t0,025 -> t.inv(0,975)!!!!

Brain and Cognition (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions