Research into conformity (Asch and Zimbardo) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was Asch’s aim?

A

To investigate the degree to which individuals would conform to a majority who have obviously wrong answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was ashes procedure (lab experiment)?

A

-123 male undergraduates
-told study was on visual perception
-7-9 people looking at display
-correct answer was always obvious (unambiguous)
-confederates(accomplices) Dave the same incorrect answer on 12 out of 18 trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were asch’s findings?

A

37% critical trials were conformed on
75% confirmed to at least one wrong answer
25% never gave a wrong answer
5% conformed to all wrong answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was Asch’s conclusions?

A

-When interviewed afterwards, they said that they complained publicly to avoid rejection in disapproval, but privately, they continue to trust own judgements
-demonstrates a strong tendency to confirm to group pressures in the situation, even when the answer is clear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does it mean as most participants before publicly, but not privately? (conclusion)

A

it suggests they were motivated by normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What percentage of these trials did the participants stick to their own original judgement and what does this demonstrate? (conclsusion)

A

63%, demonstrated a tendency to participate to stick to what they believed to be correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were the situational variables affecting conformity?

A

-task difficulty
-Group size
-Unanimity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does task difficulty do?

A

conformity increases when the task difficulty increases, as the right answer becomes less obvious, therefore confidence in our own judgement tends to drop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the task difficulty procedure?

A

Difficulty was increased by making the stimulus line and comparison line similar to each other, so the correct answer is less obvious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were the conformity rates due to task difficulty?

A

Task more difficult- participants were more likely to conform to the wrong answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why did task difficulty influence conformity?

A

-ISI plays a greater role when the task is harder
-this is because the situation is more ambiguous so we are more likely to look to others more for guidance and assume they are right about the correct response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did group size do?

A

research indicates that conformity rate increases the size of a majority influence increased, but only to certain point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the procedure for group size?

A

ash investigated group size by varying the number of confederates (1-15)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what were the conformity rates for group size?

A

-one p and one c 3%
-2 c’s 13%
-3 c’s 32%
-adding extra confederates had no further effects on overall conformity rates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

when is groups size important?

A

Only to certain point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why did group size influence conformity?

A

-Due to NSI- the task is unambiguous and the only reason participants may conform to the majority would it be to avoid disapproval

17
Q

what did increasing the size of the majority beyond 3 do and why ? (conclusion)

A

-it didn’t increased levels of conformity
-Brown and Byrne (1997)people might suspect collusion with the majority rises beyond three or four

18
Q

what did Brown and Byrne (1997) suggest? (Group size conclusion)

A

people might suspect collusion with the majority rises beyond three or four

19
Q

what does unanimity mean?

A

All group members are in agreement with each other

20
Q

what does unanimity do to conformity rates?

A

Conformity rates have been found to decline when majority influence is not unanimous(majority does not agree with each other)

21
Q

what was the procedure of unanimity?

A

-ash wanted to know if the presence of another non-conforming person would affect the participant conformity
-He introduced a dissenter who disagreed with the others (sometimes right, sometimes wrong)-different to majority

22
Q

what were the conformity rates for unanimity?

A

-when the confederate had been instructed to give correct, answers throughout, conformity to wrong, answers drop to 5.5
-When a lone dissenter gave the wrong answer conformity dropped to 9%.

23
Q

why did unanimity influence conformity?

A

-Breaking the groups unanimity was the major factor in conformity reduction
-The presence of the dissenter, enables the naive participant to behave more independently

24
Q

what does and experiment being controlled mean?

A

It’s replicable and reliable

25
Q

Why were ethical issues a limitation?

A

-Deception, misled about key aspects
-As a result lack of informed consent was an issue as participants didn’t know the true nature of the study about conformity
-Although researchers would argue that deception was necessary in this experiment to avoid demand characteristics

26
Q

what was Zimbardo’s aim?

A

-To investigate the extent to which people would conform to the rules in a role-playing stimulation of prison life
-To investigate whether conforming behaviour was due to the person (dispositional factors)-nature or the prison context (situational factors – then real life, they would not conform to the rules)

27
Q

What was the first part of Zimbardo’s
Procedure?

A

-Stanford, prison study(mock prison)
-Controlled observation
-24 Male students from a volunteer sample.
-All volunteers were psychologically and physically screened
-Participants were randomly allocated to the role of prisoner or guard
-Zimbardo played the role of prison supervisor, as well as psychologist and the study was planted to last 14 days

28
Q

what was the second part of Zimbardo’s procedure (dehumanisation, and deindividuation process)?

A

-Prisoners, unexpectedly, arrested at home and taken to the prison and dehumanised
-Dehumanisation- blindfolded, stocking caps to simulate a bald head.
-Deindividuation- prisoners dressed in smock dresses and given prison ID number, guards- wearing uniforms and reflective (mirror) sunglasses, which made them feel anonymous

29
Q

What was the zimbardo’s findings?

A

-Dehumanisation was apparent as the guards began to humiliate the prisoners and made them clean the toilet with their bare hands
-Deindividuation was noticeable by the prisoners referring to each other as themselves by the prison numbers instead of their names

30
Q

What were Zimbardo’s findings part 2?

A

-Guards, prisoners and researchers all conformed to their social roles
-Participants found themselves behaving as if they were in a prison, rather than in a psychological study
-Their behaviour became a threat to the prisoners, psychological and physical health, and the study was stopped after six days

31
Q

What was zimbardo’s conclusion?

A

-Study revealed the power of the situation
-The social roles that the participants play has influenced their uncharacteristic behaviour, even when such roles override an individuals moral beliefs about their personal behaviour

32
Q

what can Zimbardo’s research do psychology?

A

ruin reputation

33
Q

why are demand characteristics a limitation of Zimbardo’s procedure?

A

-lowers internal validity