Research and stats Flashcards

1
Q

2 types of extraneous variables

A

1) confounding - related to IV
2) disturbance - DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • percentages of scores in each standard deviation in normal distribution
A

1 = 68%
2 = 95%
3 = 99%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Leptokurtic vs. Platykurtic

A

Lepto = sharp peak “piled up” in the middle; flatter tails than normal
Platykurtic = flatter in the middle; thicker tails

plat rhymes with flat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

History threats
Maturation threats
Differential selection
- how to control

A
  • 1+ groups
  • random assignment to groups
  • differential selection = random assignment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Statistical regression aka regression to the mean
- how to control

A

1+ groups and ensuring their extreme scores are equivalent at the beginning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

THREATS

  • testing-
  • instrumentation
  • differential attrition
A
  • pretest affects post test (don’t administer pretest or use Solomon group)
  • instrument used to measure dv changes over time
  • drop out reasons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Types of validity
Population
Ecological
Temporal
Treatment variation
Outcome

A
  • different population
  • environment
  • across time
  • variations in treatment
  • different but related dvs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reactivity
- demand characteristics
- experiment expectancy

A
  • act different
  • cues from research
  • experiment behaviour is biased
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  • multiple treatment interference aka carryover or order effects
A
  • counterbalancing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  • selection treatment interaction
A
  • people differ from the population and the difference affects how they respond to the IV
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Pretest treatment interaction

A
  • participants respond to the iv differently
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  • Solomon 4 group design
A

IV= expose 2 groups to IV and only give one the pretest

DV= don’t expose groups to DV and one group takes and pre and post test and other group takes the post test only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Grounded theory
Phenomenology
Ethnography
Thematic

A
  • abstract theory via participants views
  • lived experience of ppl
  • join culture
  • find themes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Single subject designs
(Can be 2+ subjects but then treated as a single group)
- AB
- reversal
- Multiple baseline

A

DV measured multiple times
- if change is due to maturation
- ABA, ABABA (withdraw after AB) if change is due to history
- IV applied to multiple different baselines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Group designs (ANOVA)
- between subjects
- within subjects
- mixed designs

A
  • 2+ groups exposed to 1IV with 2+ levels (what therapy affects anxiety cbt, eft, or psychodynamic)
  • within subjects experiences all levels of IV
  • include tome series design (measure DV multiple times before IV)
  • 2IV (I between and 1 within) example - CBT, eft, psychodynamic and time (pre, mid and long ost)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Factorial designs

A
  • 2+ IV with 2+ levels each
  • include main and interaction effects
    Eg. Therapy type and gender
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Probability sample
- simple random
- systematic random
- stratified random
- cluster random

A
  • everyone has equal change
  • select every th
  • divide everyone into subgroups based on characterisitcs then random select
  • natural clusters or random sampling not possible - select a sample of clusters or random sample of individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Non probability sample
- convenience
- voluntary response
- purposive/judgemental
- snowball

A
  • ready accessible
  • volunteered
  • research used judgment to select
  • referral based
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Bivariate correlations
- Pearson
- spearman
- point biserial
- biserial
- contingency

A
  • both are continuous and linear relationship (use eta when not linear)
  • both ranks spear killed moby dick which is a high ranking book
  • 1 continuous; 1 true dichotomy he’s the true one point blank
  • 1 continuous; 1 fake dichotomy
  • both nominal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Multivariate correlations
- multiple regression
- canonical correlation
- discriminate function
- logistic regression.

A
  • 2+ predictors, continous
  • 2+ predictors, 2+ criteria, all continous
  • 2+ predictors, 1 nominal criteria discriminate = you need to discriminate the criteria
  • discrimination function for non normal data
21
Q

SEM
- observed
- latent
- exogenous
- endogenous

A
  • directly observed and measured
  • inferred
  • not explain or predicted in sem
  • explained by other variables in sem

exogenous = EXclude

22
Q

Null vs alternative hypothesis

A
  • iv doesn’t have affect (you want to retain a true null hypothesis)
  • iv does have an effect (you want to reject a false null hypothesis)

*false null hypothesis means the null hypothesis is something else (alternative hypothesis = there is an effect)

23
Q

Type 1 error
Type 2 error

A
  • reject a true null hypothesis (false positive) - alpha (signifier)
  • retain a false null hypothesis (false negative) - beta
24
Q

What is Bayesian statistics

A
  • combine info from data with previous info/beliefs/certainty about parameter
  • use % chance and % confidence intervals
25
26
Bayes theorem 3
1) previous knowledge (prior) 2) current data (likelihood function) 3) update knowledge (posterior)
27
Parametric vs non parametric
- interval and ratio data vs nominal and ordinal data
28
- Single sample chi square (goodness of fit) - multiple sample (contingency tables)
- 1 variable (if girls like lipstick or lip gloss) 2+ variables (if girls and woman like lipstick or lipgloss)
29
Single sample t test T test for unrelated/uncorrelated samples T test for related/correlated samples
- compare sample to population mean - 2 unrelated groups - 2 related eg. Matched participants, pre-post
30
ANOVA
- 3+ levels of an IV or continuous DV - f ratio > 1 = effect - mean square between / mean square within
31
Other ANOVAS Factorial Mixed/split plot Randomized block ANCOVA MANOVA Trend analysis
- 2+ IV (better than separate f ratios for each main and interaction effect) - 1 between subjects IV and 1 within subjects IV - controls for variable by including it as an IV - controls for variable by removing its effect on DV - 1+ IV and 2+DV (continuous variables) - if IV has significant linear or nonlinear relationships to DV
32
F ratio Planned comparisons Post hoc tests
- significant main effect - based on theory - after f ratio is significant
33
Cohens d - small, medium, large
- less than .2 - .2 to .8 - more than .8
34
Clinical significant (Jacobson Truax)
- calculate a relianble change index (RCI) to see if significant is due to actual change rather than error - calculate cut off - recovered, improved, unchanged, deteriortaitsd *is JW actually going to change??**
35
Reliability - test retest - alternate forms - internal consistency - inter rater
- scores over time - scores across different forms - scores over test items - across raters
36
- internal consistency - coefficient alpha/cronbachs - kinder Richardson’s - split half reliability - spearman’s brown prophecy formula
- average inter item consistency across sample - dichotomous items - split the test in half and correlating the 2 scores - determined effects of lengthening or shortening test items *you’re crude and you’re rich. You’re either rich or not*
37
Inter rater - percent agreement - cohens kappa
- % agreed (doesn’t account for chance agreement) - nominal *I used this for my qualitative analysis*
38
Factors affecting reliability - content homogeneity - range of scores - guessing
- homogenous = larger - less restricted range = larger - easier to guess
39
Items difficulty Item discrimination
- % answered correctly (0-1) - ability to discriminate high and low performance (-1 to +1)
40
Confidence intervals - calculate standard error of measurement
- SD X square root of (1-reliability coefficient) - 68% confidence interval = 1 standard error - 95% = 2 standard error - 99% = 3 standard errors
41
Item response theory - item characteristic curve (x and y axis) - difficulty/secerirt/location parameter - discrimination parameter - probability of guessing correctly
- relationship between item and latent trait - x axis = total test scores - y axis = probably of answering correctly or endorsing items - level of trait required for 50% to endorse items - discriminate between high or low of the trait; steep = better - 0 = more difficulty
42
43
Define cross validation and shrinkage - when is shrinkage greatest
- related to criterion validity -cross validate using a new sample because shrinkage can happen (some correlations happen by chance and these likely won’t happen again during the second sampling) - greatest shrinkage when sample is small and there are 2+ predictors
44
Standard error of estimate
Confidence interval around predicted criterion score
45
Correction for attenuation
- criterion related coefficient gets low because of measurement error - so validity coefficient underestimate relationship - correction estimates the maximum validity coefficient
46
Define these for predictor and criterion/incremental validity - true positives - false positives - true negatives - false negatives - base rate (how to calculate) - positive hit rate (how to calculate)
- high P and C - high P and low C - low P and C - low P and high C - base rate (# true positive + false negatives/n) - positive hit (# true positives/total # of positives)
47
- define and formula - sensitivity - specificity - hit rate - positive predictive value - negative predictive value
- people with dx (true positive/true positive + false negative) - people without dx (true negative/true negative + false positive) - correctly categorized (true positive + true negative/n) - probably test positive actually had dx (true positive/true positive + false positive) - probably test negative actually not have dx (true negative/true negative + false negative)
48
99-11 - 95 CI = 2 SD above and below mean - standard error of 3 - 3x2 = 6
49
Relationship between reliability and validity
As validity increases, reliability shrinks