Reports Flashcards
What are the basic stages of a full write up?
1) Type of ANOVA run (if nonparametric say why)
2) The main effects (including marginal means)
3) The interaction
4) Interpret the effect size (np2)
5) Include any post-hoc tests that are necessary (Bonferroni corrected) (put the raw means in a table)
6) Provide a summary statement
Whats an example of a one way between/within PPs ANOVA results report?
A one way between/within participants ANOVA showed that there was a significant effect of ______ on ______ (F(df between/experimental, df within/error) = [F value], p = [p value], np2 = [np2 value]).
Bonferroni corrected post-hoc tests revealed that [condition 1] resulted in improved performance (M = __, SD = __) compared to [condition 2] (M = __, SD = __; t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]). The comparison between [condition 1] and [condition 3] (M = __, SD = __) was also significant (t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]). However, the contrast between [condition 2] and [condition 3] was not significant (t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]).
This suggests that __________________
What’s an example of a 1 way nonparametric between PPs ANOVA results report?
As the data were not normally distributed, a Kruskal-Wallis one way ANOVA was performed on [Factor 1]. The scores for [Level 1] (Median = __) were the highest followed by [Level 2] (Median = __) and finally [Level 3] (Median = __).
The results showed that there was a significant difference between [3 levels] (X2(df) = [X2 value], p = [p value]).
Bonferroni corrected post hoc Mann-Whitney U tests revealed that scores for [Level 1] were significantly higher than scores for [Level 2] (Mann-Whitney U = [U value], p = [p value]) and [Level 3] (Mann-Whitney U = [U value], p = [p value]). However, there was no significant difference between [Level 2] and [Level 3] (Mann-Whitney U = [U value], p = [p value]).
These results suggest that ____________
What’s an example of a 1 way nonparametric within PPs ANOVA results report?
As the data were not normally distributed a Friedman’s one way ANOVA was performed on [Factor 1]. The scores for [Level 1] (Median = __) were the highest followed by [Level 2] (Median = __) and finally [Level 3] (Median = __).
The results showed that there was a significant difference between [3 Levels] (X2(df) = [X2 value], p = [p value]).
Bonferroni corrected post hoc Wilcoxon tests revealed that scores for [Level 1] were significantly higher than scores for [Level 2] (z = [z value], p = [p value]) and [Level 3] (z = [z value], p = [p value]). However there was no significant difference between [Level 2] and [Level 3] (z = [z value], p = [p value]).
These results suggest that _____________
What’s an example of a 2x2 between PPs ANOVA results report?
A 2x2 between participants ANOVA with 1 Factor of ____ with 2 levels (____ or ____) and a second Factor of ____ with 2 levels (____ or ____) showed that there was a significant main effect of [Factor 1] on [DV] (F(df1,df2) = [F value], p = [p value], np2 = [np2 value]). Overall [Factor 1 Level 1] participants had higher [DV] (Marginal Mean = __) than [Factor 1 Level 2] participants (Marginal Mean = __). There was also a significant main effect of [Factor 2] (F(df1,df2) = [F value], p = [p value], np2 = [np2 value]) with [Factor 2 Level 1] participants demonstrating higher [DV] (Marginal Mean = __) than [Factor 2 Level 2] participants (Marginal Mean = __). There was also a significant interaction between [Factor 1] and [Factor 2] (F(df1,df2) = [F value], p = [p value], np2 = [np2 value]).
Table 1 presents mean scores for [DV] and SD for each condition. Bonferroni corrected post-hoc t-tests showed that [Factor 1 Level 2 with Factor 2 Level 1] participants were less _____ (M = __, SD = __) compared to [Factor 1 Level 2 with Factor 2 Level 2] participants (M = __, SD = __; t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]), whereas [Factor 1 Level 1 with Factor 2 Level 2] demonstrated less ___ (M = __, SD = __) than [Factor 1 Level 1 with Factor 2 Level 1] (M = __, SD = __; t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]).
The contrast between [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 1] and [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 2] was also significant (t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]) and demonstrated that [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 1] are less ____ than [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 2]. However the contrast between [Factor 2 Level 1 with Factor 1 Level 1 and Level 2] was not significant (t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]).
These results suggest that _______________
What’s an example of a 2x2 within PPs ANOVA results report?
A 2x2 within participants ANOVA with 1 Factor of ___ with 2 levels (____ or ____) and a second Factor of ___ with 2 levels (____ or ____) was conducted.
The results showed that there was a significant main effect of [Factor 1] on [DV] (F(df1,df2) = [F value], p = [p value], np2 = [np2 value]). Overall, [Factor 1 Level 1] had a higher [DV] (Mean = __) than [Factor 1 Level 2] (Mean = __). There was also a significant main effect of [Factor 2] on [DV] (F(df1,df2) = [F value], p = [p value], np2 = [np2 value]). Overall, [Factor 2 Level 1] had a higher [DV] (Mean = __) than [Factor 2 Level 2] (Mean = __).
In addition, there was a significant interaction between [Factor 1 and Factor 2] on [DV] (F(df1,df2) = [F value], p = [p value], np2 = [np2 value]).
Bonferroni corrected post-hoc t-tests showed that [Factor 1 Level 2 with Factor 2 Level 1] resulted in less ____ (M = __, SD = __) compared to [Factor 1 Level 2 with Factor 2 Level 2] (M = __, SD = __; t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]), whereas [Factor 1 Level 1 with Factor 2 Level 2] demonstrated less ___ (M = __, SD = __) than [Factor 1 Level 1 with Factor 2 Level 1] (M = __, SD = __; t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]).
The contrast between [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 1] and [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 2] was also significant (t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]) and demonstrated that [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 1] showed less ___ than [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 2]. However, the contrast between [Factor 2 Level 1 with Factor 1 Level 1 and Level 2] was not significant (t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]).
This suggests that _______________
What’s an example of a 2x2 split plot ANOVA results report?
A 2x2 split plot ANOVA with 1 Factor of ____ (Level 1 & Level 2) and a second Factor of ____ (Level 1 & Level 2) was conducted.
The results showed that there was a significant main effect of [Factor 1] on [DV] (F(df1,df2) = [F value], p = [p value], np2 = [np2 value]). This showed that __% of the variance in ___ can be attributed to ___. Overall, [Factor 1 Level 1] had a higher [DV] (Mean = __) than [Factor 1 Level 2] (Mean = __).
There was also a significant main effect of [Factor 2] on [DV] (F(df1,df2) = [F value], p = [p value], np2 = [np2 value]). Overall, [Factor 2 Level 1] had a higher [DV] (Mean = __) than [Factor 2 Level 2] (Mean = __).
In addition there was a significant interaction between [Factor 1 and Factor 2] on [DV] (F(df1,df2) = [F value], p = [p value], np2 = [np2 value]).
Bonferroni corrected post-hoc t-tests showed that [Factor 1 Level 2 with Factor 2 Level 1] resulted in less ___ (M = __, SD = __) compared to [Factor 1 Level 2 with Factor 2 Level 2] (M = __, SD = __; t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]), whereas [Factor 1 Level 1 with Factor 2 Level 2] demonstrated less ___ (M = __, SD = __) than [Factor 1 Level 1 with Factor 2 Level 1] (M = __, SD = __; t(df) = [t value, p = [p value]).
The contrast between [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 1] and [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 2] was also significant (t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]) and demonstrated that [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 1] showed less ___ than [Factor 2 Level 2 with Factor 1 Level 2]. However, the contrast between [Factor 2 Level 1 with Factor 1 Level 1 and Level 2] was not significant (t(df) = [t value], p = [p value]).
This suggests that ________________
