Religious experiences Flashcards
How did William James differentiate between ‘real’ and ‘genuine’ REs?
Genuine- the person believes the experience to be true
Real- the experience is actually true (it came from God)
Only genuine can actually be tested for
What did James describe as qualities of a religion experience?
Ineffability- impossible to be able to adequately express using normal language
Noetic quality- a truth is revealed
Transcience- Over quite soon (although its effects may last a lifetime)
Passivity- The experience is being controlled outside themselves, they are the recipient not the instigator
What did James as fruits of a religious experience?
Awareness- truth/ knowledge gained
Elation- positive outcome/ feeling
Self-surrender- a commitment is formed
Change- change or conversion
How did Swinburne distinguish between different types of RE?
Ordinary- finding God in everyday things eg a sunset
Extraordinary- a unique experience believed o come from God, eg a vision
What are Swinburne’s two different principles regarding whether REs should be believed?
Principle of testimony- you should believe what your senses are telling you (they are correct more often than not)
Principle of testimony- If you trust the person, you should believe what they are saying is true until you have enough evidence to say otherwise
What did Richard Gale say about REs?
Religious experiences should not be treated the same to other experiences
What did Carl Sagan say about REs?
‘Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence’
What did C Stephen- Evans say about REs?
Religious people add a religious dimension to everyday experiences
How did St Teresa of Avila suggest the ‘realness’ of a REs should be tested? How is this flawed?
- Does it fit with Christian teachings?
- Does it leave them feeling a sense of peace between God, themselves and the world? If not it may be the world of the devil
Possible flaw- many REs in the Bible, accepted as real, involve progressive change, and therefore did not align with Christian teachings at the time (eg Peter’s vision in Acts, removing Kosher laws from christianity as anything god created should not be deemed as unclean)
How did Rudolph Otto define REs?
‘Mysterium, tremendum et fascinans’
M- Realisation that God is different
T- Of great importance, awe-inspiring, significant
F- Attractive and dangerous, recipient feels a sense of privilege
How did Schleiermacher believe we should test REs?
We shouldn’t- they are self-authenticating for the recipient
Give 4 main criticisms of James’ conclusions on REs
- ‘Mystical experience’ is a useful phrase to refer to something outside our understanding, but by doing this have we uncovered anything at all, or said anything useful if we cannot understand it?
- Flew rejected James’ ideas that REs can be authenticated by the effects it has on the individual as they cannot be tested using empirical evidence
- Psychological explanations eliminate the religious elements of these experiences as they can be explained
- Experience is fallible, and James overly emphasises this
Give 3 main strengths of James’ conclusions on REs
- A finite, limited, human being is not capable of making up the knowledge gained through the noetic quality of the religious experience, therefore it must come from an incomprehensible, powerful God
- He is modest in his approach, and doesn’t attempt to prove experiences as real and coming from God. This also discourages religious arrogance or superiority, nor is he preaching
- James examines other areas of the mind psychology may not be able to explain, ignore, or be quick to discredit
What word is useful when describing the ‘truth’ or ‘realness’ of a religious experience?
Veracity
What are some weaknesses of Swinburne’s ideas?
Doesn’t take into account why people may lie
Normalises REs
‘Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Doesn’t seek evidence- goes against normal human thinking
