religious experience Flashcards

1
Q

ineffable

A

experience beyond language and cant be put into words to describe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

noetic

A

knowledge or insight thats gained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

transient

A

experience is temporary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

passive

A

experience happens to person and person doesnt make experience happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

james description of mystical experience

A

defies expression that no adequate report of its contents can be given in words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

james pluralist argument

A

must be explanation to why 4 criteria in all experiences across cultures
-cant be by chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

whats james explanation for RE

A

higher spiritual reality
-W.Stace writer developed this claiming universality of certain features of RE evidence they are real

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does james conclude about RE

A

Mystical experiences core of religion and teaching and practices are second hand religion
-makes james view pluralist that all religions are true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Paul knitter pluralist view

A

metaphor of religion
-each religion is a well
-if you get to bottom of well and water you realise water is also sourcing all other wells
-well is mystical experience and bottom of wells other religions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

alternative explanation to james pluralist view

A

-cross similarity have naturalistic explanations
-could be all human brains hallucinate similarly because they evolved similarily
-RE serve a universal psychological function Jung
-without need of higher spiritual reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

james on why RE are not hallucinations

A

RE can have positive and big life changing effects which we can observe
-not hallucniations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

James epistemology

A

pragmatist- if something good for us works then its evidence of its truth
-most interested in effects of RE and argued validity depends on those effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

James and alcoholic case study

A

-was unable to give up alcohol
-had RE and gave it up
-after RE he gained power which lacked before
-evidence for experience that came from higher spiritual reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

James on conversion experiences

A

conversions example of life changing impact of RE
-viewed conversion as transformation from unhappy divided to unified happy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

counter to James pragmatic view

A

-if hallucination happens to fit certain beliefs person might have then might be life changing even if its not real
-reason for life changing only because of beliefs
-not from higher spiritual reality but hallucination- ockams razor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

swinburne and RE

A

evidence analysis based approach
-RE can justify belief in god as long as it survives standard empirical testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Swinburne principle of rationality

A

if we experience something or someone tells us they have experienced something then thats evidence for that thing probably being true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

swinburne principle of credulity

A

-argues you should believe what you experience unless you have reason not to

19
Q

swinburne principle of testimony

A

you should believe what others tell you they have experienced unless you have a reason not to

20
Q

consequence of swinburnes theory

A

-rejects a lot of RE
-many RE caused by someone being a liar or psychological influences
-cases with naturalistic explanations for RE

21
Q

counter to swinburnes theory

A

-is experience of god enough to justify belief in god
-need extraordinary evidence for extraordinary claim

22
Q

what does freud call religion

A

obsessional neurosis thats derived from 2 main psychological factors

23
Q

what are the 2 main psychological factors religion is derived from (Freud)

A

-fear of death- instinctual animalistic fear of death cant control but control out human cognition, so we trigger fear of death on animalistic side
-solution to believe death not end
2- innocence- christians call god father because they want to be a child and innocent forever

24
Q

mirage and humans delusions for religion

A

-person lost in desert desperate for water so they hallucinate it
-likewise humans desperately afraid of death so delude thinking of caring god and afterlife

25
counter- frueds analysis fails to explain mystical RE
-because it sense of unity with something infinite and unbounded -freuds theory might work against visions but mystical are ecstatic, immersive - harder to dismiss as hallucinations caused by delusory wishful thinking
26
evaluation to counter of freud
he argues intense mystical experiences are reliving childhood experiences before ego had formed -explains dissolving sense of self and resultant unity with everything in mystical experiences -reliving experiences of selflessness -
27
counter- evaluation
plenty of non neurotic religious people -psychological arguments may be true for a lot but not for even one person -freud unempirical as small sample and Popper argues freuds theories were unfalsifiable
28
persingers challenge to RE
gives physiological challenge to RE
29
persingers god helmet
-created god helmet which physiologically manipulated peoples brain waves and sometimes caused them to have RE where they felt presence of unseen beings
30
what are RE for persinger
originate from brain -experiences just an unusual state of the brain =regular RE caused by unknown brain processes without a machine
31
religious response to persinger
-brain manipulation mechanism by which god created RE -hallucinations manipulating brain with drugs like LSD -doesnt count against validity of RE that occur without manipulations
32
evaluation of persinger
persinger demonstrates RE could have naturalistic explanations -god helmet cannot rule out supernatural causes -ockhams razor- simpler so if RE have naturalistic explanation then no need for supernatural cause
33
what are conversion experiences
influence a person to join a religion -any type of RE could be conversion experience
34
St pauls conversion experience
road to damascus -converted to christianity -jesus said saul why do you persecute me -he said who are you and jesus said its me who your persecuting
35
freud on conversion experiences
freuds psychological critique applied to conversion experiences
36
defence of conversion experiences from Freud
-conversion experiences from one religion to another not wishful thinking or fear of death -person having experience already believed in god so wishful thinking of afterlife already satisfied by current religion
37
what are corporate RE
-multiple people have RE together -acts 2:3- all of them were filled with HS and began to speak tongues
38
toronto blessing
-HS triggered forms of worship and being possesed by HS -
39
pentacostalism
focus on intense shared worship -speaking in tongues -form of corporate RE
40
psychological group dynamics as criticism to corporate RE -
-mass hysteria and social compliance -religious mania -example of people who think they have seen aliens -group delusion possible not caused by higher power- ockhams razor
41
multiple claims issue
-RE have evidence against them and since not all religions cant be true- RE about different religions conflict with each other -if all religions have RE and most religions cant be true then generally unreliable RE
42
multiple claim issue 2
-evidence for one religion must be taken as evidence against all of others -claiming RE is evidence for a particular religious belief only creates more evidence against it
43
pluralism response to multiple claims issue
-James and hick think mystical RE occuring in all religions and being life changing show they are true in pragmatic sense -different religions like blind men touching different part of elephant