ancient philosophy Flashcards

1
Q

rationalism

A

human reason source of all knowledge and truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

cave analogy summarised

A

-prisoners in cave chained, fire illuminates shadows and think they are real
-one prisoner released through hard journey out of cave and sees light, truth out of cave
-prisoner sees how much better this world is
-if prisoner returns to cave he wont be able to see well in semi darkness and people will mock him

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does cave represent in analogy

A

-out material world
-prisoner trapped in this lesser world only using their senses
-what prisoners think is real only shadow of real objects
-deceived by senses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does sun represent in cave analogy

A

-the highest of all forms- form of the good
-form of good illuminates all other forms
-enables the forms to be known through reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

cave being inferior to outside world meaning

A

just like cave inferior to outside world
-like how senses less reliable than reason for using to gain knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

meaning of prisoner being mocked by people in cave and not being able to see if he returns

A

-could be reference to socrates
-he was executed because he corrupted minds of youth in athens
-encouraged them to question and use rational thought
-shows how entrenched out thinking can be
-how we are reluctant to use our reason and rather rely on our senses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

arguments arguing analogy of cave us useful today

A

-shows senses deceive us, what we experience or observe only partial reality, shadows seen by prisoners inferior to real world outside cave
-truth only accessible to philosophers
-senses can trap us like chained prisoners, use senses instead of reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

particulars

A

changing things we witness in world of senses for example roses in garden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

immutable

A

unchanging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

form

A

platos description of perfect unchanging concept or ideal in world of form eg, form of good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

anamnesis

A

soul remembering from the world of forms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

world of apperances

A

our world
-thing appear to be real but will die
-change or decay
-illusion of reality but poor imitation of reality
-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

why do we disagree on beauty according to plato

A

-because our senses deceive us
-our opinions based in senses which are unreliable
-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

world of forms

A

-immutable
perfect
eternal, forms or ideals
-reality remains constant
-can be understood through reason rather senses
-why person good and pen beautifull
-for plato- using reason we work out particulars participate in form of good, ideal concept of goodness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

heirachy of forms

A

form of good
-form of justice, form of beauty, equals
-abstract ideas
-mathematical reasoning
-above all in world of forms
-material objects and opinions based in senses from world of apperances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the theory of the forms make sense arguments

A

-we observe in this world change and decay, nothing perfect and changing but world of forms everything perfect and eternal
-world of forms real world, like world outside cave, better than inside cave
-can be deceived by our senses so better to use reason
-world of forms has ideal concepts, beauty justice truth, immutable, recognise beauty in something because they participate in form of beauty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

the theory of forms makes no sense arguments

A

-change better than unchanging things, without change we couldnt progress in world
-material world all we know and have evidence of, senses help us learn and survive
-reason difficult, better to rely on senses as provide verifiable evidence
-if one form of good then why are there disagrees of about what true goodness is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

where did aristotle think knowledge came from

A

from senses, experiences and observations
-no need to look outside this world for answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

motus

A

aristotle says everything in world changing
-things going from potentuality to actuality because of external forces
-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

aristotles four causes

A

describe process of change observed by our senses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

material cause

A

matter of substance something is made of
-doesnt yet explain how or why motus occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

efficient cause

A

-process of something coming into existence
-silversmith who makes ring
-describes process of change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

formal cause

A

-how we know something is
-shapes and character
-explains motus by describing result of the change from material cause through efficient cause into object it is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

final cause

A

describes the telos or purpose, why object is there
-most important to aristotle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
aristotles four causes give true picture of reality arguments
-material cause obvious, everything must have physical matter -efficient cause explains process of change motus, -formal cause helps us understand what something is, form of object its soul -final cause telos, questions why world or objects are they way they are -it object fulfills its purpose its good, goodness not found elsewhere but intrinsic to object -empirical theory application to everything
26
aristotles four causes dont give true picture of reality arguments
-no material cause for concepts like beauty, only participate in form of beauty -Hume, observe cause and effect, doesnt mean effect result of cause -not everyone agrees on formal cause, what makes me me, no soul, only physical -goodness may not be linked to purpose, knife cuts well but is it a good knife -senses deceive
27
problems with purpose weakness of four causes
-purpose doesnt have to be intrinsic, purpose given to object by creator -some things dont have purpose or purpose changes
28
how did aristotle understand the universe to be
eternal no beginning or end
29
what does movement of objects cause
things in world exhibit continuous motus -changing from potentuality, actuality, potentuality -movement results in change because thinks being drawn towards the final cause
30
whats the prime mover
-ultimate final cause -immutable -final cause of movement and change because it draws things towards itself without doing anything itself -attracts things do it
31
how does prime mover attract
-so everything in continous cycle from potential to actual -concentric circles of movement
32
what does prime mover explain
-explains reason and purpose for constant state of motus
33
features of prime mover
-pure actuality -demigod -must only contemplate itself -perfection
34
aristotles prime mover helps explain world arguments
-we can observe natural things seem to have telos and drawn to end goal, prime mover explains motus and change -explains perpetual motion and predictability of planet movement, pure actuality and attracts perfection -as final cause gives everything ultimate purpose
35
aristotles prime mover does not help to explain world arguments
-observation of purpose human construct, humans give purpose so its external not intrinsic to object, no external cause purpose, no need for prime mover -if prime mover pure thought, how can it effect universe, no causal effect -cannot observe prime mover using senses, moves to reason even though he discredits plato for it
36
form of the good
highest form in forms -all other forms and particulars participate in form of good -sun in cave analogy
37
what does form of good do
-enlightens us -gives understanding to mind -helps us to reason rather rely on senses -recollecting goodness from form of good -immutable, eternal, perfect
38
similarities between form of good and prime mover
-both transcendent and cannot be known using senses, need reason to understand them -perfect, immutable, eternal -prime mover telos of everything and form of good aim of everything
39
differences in prime mover and form of good- motus
-prime mover draws and attracts motus towards itself because its final cause -form of good unchanging and part of world of forms, change only happens in shadow world, unchanging
40
aristotles prime mover more success arguments
prime mover explains why there is change -based prime mover on senses and final cause -form of good doesnt explain this world but prime mover clear about how it effects us -
41
platos form of good more success arguments
-explains why change in shadow world, change and decay but participates in world of forms and form of good -prime mover cant be observed with senses but form of good not part of material world so better to use reason to work out -explains why we recognise goodness in shadow world, if something good, involved in form of good
42
epistemology
study of knowledge
43
plato and reason
knowledge comes from using reason and recollecting from world of forms -senses decieve and control us -senses chain and imprison us in ever changing world of shadows -knowledge unchanging and eternal so cant be from material world from senses
44
aristotle and empiricism
-we should use our senses to discover knowledge -true knowledge found in categorising things by difference -motus, four causes and final cause -
45
empiricism makes more sense of reality arguments
-no empirical evidence of existence of another world, should rely on senses -use reason after we have used senses and experiences and observed -if one form of good why do we disagree , can observe whether something fulfills its final cause -learning harder than remembering, with empiricism we learn with senses and experience
46
rationalism makes more sense of reality arguments
-rationalists argue concepts like justice innate because we just know, knowledge through reason -reason makes more sense of reality remember what happens -senses deceive us, different opinions of whats good, if we escape senses we can understand form of good, -senses deceive, reason more difficult but more reliable
47
heraclitus
thought world we experience in state of constant change which he called flux -plato interpreted him as challenging possibility to gaining knowledge
48
criticisms to the form of the good
-aristotle disagrees with platos idea of immortality is ignorance of good -cultivating virtue requirmnent to do good -Nietzche says platos form of good is dangerous error and philosophers invent ideas that suit emotional prejudice like power -how single essence of particulars shows goodness -there cannot be one unified form of goodness
49
criticism to theory of forms third man argument
-plato says if group of trees share character , they must all be partaking in form of treeness -infinite regress of things sharing character -undermine idea of forms that there is particular single form of quality that explains multiple particular instances of quality we experience in world of shadows
50
P1 P2 C1 C2 of platos anamnesis argument
-P1- we have concept of perfect justice, beauty and maths P2- we have never experiences perfect instances C1- knowledge of perfect concepts must be innate C2- must be world of forms and we must have a soul which gained perfect concepts from it before we were born
51
denying P1 of anamnesis argument
-justice and beauty subjective -matters of opinion not fact -culture and conditions determine what person finds beautiful -Hume- we can create perfection in minds even if we havent experienced it -take concept of imperfect and conceive opposite
52
purpose unscientific weakness of four causes
Francis Bacon- criticised aristotle for saying final cause has no place in empirical world, but a metaphysical divine matter, -modern science rejects formal and final cause -deterministic universe with laws of physics doesnt have purpose -science can explain change and purpose in world without telos -
53
McGrath defense of purpose not being scientific
-Swinburne, Polkinghorne, say science limited and cant answer all questions -tell is what but not why -cant answer questions on purpose so cant be used to disregard existence of purpose
54
satres critique of telos
-no objective telos -existence precedes essence -humans exist before they have defined purpose and have to define their purpose for themselves -afraid of not having purpose, abandonment/ by god or reality -anguish/ weight of being responsible for own actions -despair/ inability to act exactly as wed like -easier to believe in objective purpose than face existential angst
55
defense of aristotle against satre
-satres argument is psychological -doesnt provide metaphysical grounds for rejecting telos and commiting genetic fallacy -just because people have psychological need to believe in purpose doesnt mean it doesnt exist -
56
genetic fallacy
-assuming that the way in which someone comes up with a theory is relevant to whether it is true or false
57
newton criticism of aristotles prime mover
-newton claimed when moved object will move until met be equal and opposite reaction -aristotles inference that constant motion in universe must be maintained by something like prime mover false -
58
defense of aristotles prime mover against newton
-he believed in empirical observation which created epistemological method which lead to modern scientific methods -newton only disproved aristotles claims about reality not his a posteriori approach to understanding reality so fails
59
platos one over many arguments
-argument for world of forms -we think of world in orderly categorized way but live in a world of flux- so we must have been born with concepts like treeness and beauty -we must have dim recollection shadow like charesteristics by which we are able to recognize and categorise them
60
aristotles criticism to platos one over many argument
--aristotle rejects the separation of form from things -things form is its essence, its defining quality -essential quality of treeness that a tree has cant be separated from a tree or it wouldnt be a tree -no basis for thinking that form of treeness is separate entity in another realm
61
wittgensteins criticism of the one over many argument
-argued there is no precisely definable form or abstract ideal of category -we recognise member of a category as such due to its family resemblance to other things in that category -humans divide world through language and concepts when its useful in social context -categories defined by social convention not objective reality -categories conceptual schemes mapped onto human experience of world for purpose of performing specific function
62
63