Religion in a Global Context Flashcards
Characteristics of fundamentalism
- Fundamentalists appeal to tradition – look back to ‘golden age’
- Return to fundamentals of faith
- Arises only where traditional beliefs and values are threatened or challenged by modern society
- Threat – external e.g. capitalist globalization or Western culture or internal e.g. when attitudes change
Key features of fundamentalism
- Authoritative sacred text
- ‘us and them’ mentality
- Aggressive reaction
- Use of modern technology
- Patriarchy
- Prophecy
- Conspiracy theories
How does modernity lead to fundamentalism
Davie – fundamentalism occurs when those who hold traditional beliefs are threatened by modernity
Giddens – fundamentalism is a product of and reaction to globalization (which undermines traditional social norms)
• In late modern society – individuals are faced with choice, uncertainty and risk
• Attraction of fundamentalism is the certainty it promises
• It is a retreat into answers and away from the risks of a globalizing world
Cosmopolitanism
- Giddens contrasts fundamentalism with cosmopolitanism (which embraces modernity)
- Is tolerant of the views of others, changing their beliefs in the light of new information – reflexive thinking
- Requires justification by rational arguments rather than sacred texts
- Lifestyle is a personal choice rather than something prescribed
- Cosmopolitan religion emphasizes the pursuit of personal meaning
Responses to PM
- Bauman – sees fundamentalism as a response to living in postmodernity
- PM society – brings freedom of choice, uncertainty and heightened awareness of risk (undermining old certainties of how to live)
Castells’ responses
- Resistance identity – defensive reaction of those who feel threatened
- Project identity – response of those who are forward looking and engage with social movements
Postmodernism - evaluation
- Distinguish too sharply between cosmopolitanism and fundamentalism (ignores hybrid movements)
- They are ‘fixated on fundamentalism’ and ignore other important developments e.g. how globalization is affecting non – fundamentalist religions
- Giddens lumps all types of fundamentalism together, ignoring other important developments
- Giddens’ description of fundamentalism as a defensive reaction to modernity ignores the fact
Monotheism and fundamentalism
- Bruce – main cause of fundamentalism is religious traditionalists feeling threatened by today’s globalized world
- Confined to monotheistic religions because they are based on a notion of God’s will revealed through a single, authoritative text
- Believed to be word of God and to contain specific rules for believers to follow
- Polytheistic religions lack an all – powerful deity so there is far more scope for interpretation (none have claim to absolute truth)
Secular fundamentalism - 2 phases of modernity
- Religious fundamentalism – from the enlightenment to the 1960s. Enlightenment philosophy held an optimistic belief in certainty of progress based on power of human reason. Enlightenment project dominated human thought and helped to secularize all areas of life which attacked and undermined religious certainty.
- Secular fundamentalism – since the 1970s, the optimism of the enlightenment project has itself come under attack. Growing mood of pessimism and uncertainty which is the product of the insecurity caused by changes such as globalization. Led to loss of faith in the major enlightenment ideologies such as liberalism and rationalism who claims of truth have been undermined. Some supporters of these have also turned to fundamentalism (Yugoslavia’s disintegration led to secular nationalist fundamentalism which justified the ethnic cleansing of territory to have a clear divide)
Secular fundamentalism - Davie
all fundamentalist movements are an attractive because they assert truth and certainty
Secular fundamentalism - Hervieu Leger
fundamentalism as a form of ‘recreated memories’ in late modern societies that have experienced ‘cultural amnesia’ and forgotten their historic religious traditions
Clash of civilisations - Huntingdon
- In recent years, religion has been at the centre of many global conflicts e.g. 9/11
- View of neo – conservative Huntingdon – such conflicts have intensified since the collapse of communism
- The problem is not Islamic fundamentalism, but Islam itself
Seven civilisations
- Huntingdon identifies seven civilisations – Western, Islamic, Latin American, Confucian, Japanese, Hindu and Slavic – Orthodox. Have common cultural background and history.
- Religious differences between civilisations are a major source of conflict
- Huntingdon – religious differences are creating a hostile set of ‘us and them’ relationships with increased competition for power
- Sees religious differences as harder to solve than political ones because they are deeply rooted in culture and history
- Huntingdon sees history as a struggle of ‘progress against barbarism’
- Believes West is under threat from Islam and must reassert its identity as a liberal – democratic Christian civilisation
Huntingdon - globalisation
- Globalisation has made nation states less significant as a source of identity (a gap which religion has filled)
- At the same time, globalisation increases contact between civilisations which increases risk of conflict
Evaluation - Huntingdon
- Jackson – sees Huntingdon’s work as an example of ‘orientalism’ (a western ideology which stereotypes Eastern nations and people as untrustworthy, inferior or fanatical, serving to justify exploitation)
- Casanova – argues that Huntingdon ignores important religious divisions within the ‘civilisations’ he identifies e.g. between Sunni and Shi’a Muslims
- Horrie and Chippindale – see the ‘clash of civilisations’ as a grossly misleading neo – conservative ideology that portrays the whole of Islam as an enemy. In fact, very few Muslims are remotely interested in a holy war.
- Armstrong – argues that hostility towards the West does not stem from fundamentalist Islam, but is a reaction to Western foreign policy in the Middle East (West has supported oppressive regimes and continues to support Israel despite its treatment of Palestinians)