Organisations, Movements and Members Flashcards
Church
- Large organisations, often with millions of members
- Bureaucratic hierarchy
- Claim monopoly of truth
- Universalistic, aiming to include the whole of society
- More attractive to higher classes because they are ideologically conservative and closely linked to state e.g. Queen is head of state and church of England
Sect
- Small, exclusive groups
- Hostile to wider society
- Expect high level of commitment
- Draw members from poor and oppressed
- Led by charismatic leader
Denomination
- Niebuhr – denominations e.g. methodism lies midway between churches and sects
- Membership is less exclusive than a sect, but they don’t appeal to the whole of society like churches
- Broadly accept societal values, but are not linked to the state
- Impose minor restrictions on members e.g. forbidding alcohol
- Tolerant of other organisations and don’t claim monopoly
Cult
- Cult – least organized form of organization
- Highly individualistic, loose – knit and small grouping around some shared themes (but without a sharply defined belief system)
- Cults are led by ‘practitioners’ who claim special knowledge
- Usually tolerant of other organisations and their beliefs
- Don’t demand high commitment from followers
- Members may have little involvement with the cult once they have acquired the techniques
Differences between types
- How they see themselves – churches and sects claim a legitimacy on their beliefs. Denominations and cults accept that there can be other valid interpretations.
- How they are seen by wider society – churches and denominations are seen as respectable and legitimate. Sects and cults are seen as deviant.
Loss of church power
- Sociologists argue that some of these descriptions of religious organisations do not fit today’s reality
- Bruce – argues that Troeltsch’s idea of a church as having a religious monopoly only applies to Catholicism before the reformation (when power was symbolized by imposing cathedrals)
- Since then, sects and cults have flourished, and religious diversity becomes the norm
- Today, churches are no longer truly so, but rather denominations competing
NRM - world rejecting
- Similar to Troeltsch’s sects
- Manson family, Branch Davidian and People’s temple
- Vary greatly in size
- Clearly religious with a notion of God
- Highly critical of the outside world (seek radical change)
- To achieve salvation, members must break from their old life
- Members live communally, with restricted contact to the outside world
- Movement controls all aspects of their lives
- Often have conservative moral codes
NRM - world accomodating
- Breakaways from existing mainstream churches or denominations e.g. Neo – pentecostalists who broke away from Catholicism
- Neither accept nor reject the world, focusing on the spiritual (seek to restore spiritual purity of religion e.g. Neo – pentecostalists believe that other churches have lost the holy spirit)
NRM - world affirming
- These differ from all other religious groups and lack some of the conventional features of religion such as collective worship and are not very organized
- However, like religions, they offer their members access to spiritual or supernatural powers
- Example – scientology
- Accept the world as it is, promising followers’ success in terms of mainstream goals
- Non – exclusive and tolerant of other religions, but claim to offer special knowledge or techniques that enable followers to unlock their own powers to achieve success or overcome problems
- Psychologising religions offering this – worldly gratification
- Most are cults, whose members are often customers rather than followers. Entry is through training
- Most successful – 165,000 UK scientologists vs. 1200 UK Moonies
NRM - evaluation
- Wallis offers useful way of classifying NRMs
- Not clear whether he categorises them based on their teachings or individual members’ beliefs
- Ignores diversity which may exist within NRMs
- Some NRMs have characteristics of all three
- Stark and Bainbridge – reject idea of constructing such typologies altogether. Rather, we should distinguish between religious organisations using one criterion – the degree of conflict or tension between the religious group and wider society
Conflict in society - sects
Result from schisms (splits in existing organisations)
Break away from churches over disagreements about doctrine
Conflict in society - cults
New religions e.g. Scientology or Christian Science
• Stark and Bainbridge see sects as promising other – worldly benefits e.g. place in heaven to those suffering economic or ethical deprivation (where values conflict with wider society)
• Cults tend to offer this – worldly benefits e.g. good health to more prosperous individuals who are suffering psychic deprivation (anomie) and organismic deprivation (health problems)
• Stark and Bainbridge subdivide cults according to how organized they are
Types of cults
- Audience cults – least organized and do not involve formal membership or much commitment. There is little interaction between members. Participation is often through media.
- Client cults – based on relationship between a consultant and a client and provide services to their followers. In the past, they were purveyors of medical miracles. Emphasis has shifted to ‘therapies’ promising personal fulfillment
- Cultic movements – most organized and demand higher level of commitment than other cults. Movement aims to meet all of its members religious needs. Members are not allowed to be part of other groups. Example is Moonies. Some client cults become cultic movements for their most enthusiastic followers e.g. Scientology grew out of client cult ‘dianetics’.
Types of cult - evaluation
- Stark and Bainbridge – make useful distinctions between organisations e.g. using idea of degree of conflict in order to distinguish is similar to Troeltsch’s distinction between church and sect.
- However, some examples do not fit neatly into any one of their categories.
Growth of NRMs - marginality
- as Troeltsch noted, sects tend to draw their members from the poor and oppressed
- Weber – sects tend to arise in groups who are marginal (people who feel that they are not receiving what they are due)
- Sects offer a solution to this problem by offering their members a theodicy of disprivilege (a religious explanation and justification for their suffering and disadvantage)
- May explain misfortune in terms of a test of faith to reap rewards
- Historically, many sects and millenarian movements, have recruited from marginalized poor e.g. Nation of Islam recruited successfully among disadvantaged blacks.
- However, since 1960s, sect – like, world – rejecting NRMs such as the Moonies have recruited mainly from more affluent groups of well educated, young, middle – class whites (but were still marginal because most were hippies, dropouts and drug users)
Growth of NRMs - relative deprivation
- Subjective sense of being deprived
- Although MC are materially well – off, they may feel spiritually deprived (especially in today’s materialistic, impersonal and morally lax society)
- Many turn to sects for a sense of community
- Stark and Bainbridge – it is relatively deprived who break away from churches to form sects. When MC members of a church seek to compromise beliefs in order to fit into society, deprived members may break away to safeguard original beliefs.
- The deprived may stress some of Christ’s claims about the poor
- Stark and Bainbridge argue that world – rejecting NRMs offer the deprived the compensators for the rewards they are denied in this world
- Privileged need no compensators – are attracted to world – accepting churches that express their status and bring them further earthly rewards
Growth of NRMs - social change
- Wilson argues that periods of rapid change disrupt and undermine established norms and values, producing anomie
- In response to uncertainty and insecurity which this creates, those most affected by this may turn to sects
- Example – dislocation caused by the industrial revolution in GB led to the birth of methodism (which offered a sense of community, warmth and fellowship, clear norms and values as well as the promise of salvation)
- Bruce – sees the growth of cults and sects as a response to the social changes involved in modernization and secularization
- People are less attracted to traditional churches and strict sects (because they demand too much commitment)
Growth - world rejecting
- Wallis points to social changes from the 1960s impacting on young people, including increased time spent in education
- This gave them freedom from adult responsibilities and allowed a counter – culture to develop
- Growth of radical political movements offered alternative ideas about the future
- These were attractive because they offered a more idealistic way of life
- Bruce – was the failure of counter – culture to change the world which led the disillusioned young to turn to religion