Ideology and Science Flashcards
Impact of science
- Science has had an enormous impact on society
- Achievements in medicine have eradicated once fatal diseases
- Science and technology have revolutionized economic productivity and raised our standard of living
- Success has led to a widespread ‘faith in science’
Negative effects of science
- Recently – faith in science has been dimmed by a recognition of the harms that science can cause e.g. pollution and nuclear weapons
- Both the good and the bad effects of science demonstrate the key feature distinguishing it from other belief systems – it has cognitive power (it enables us to explain, predict and control the world)
Open belief systems
• Popper – science has been successful in explaining and controlling the world because it is an open belief system in which every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny by others
• Science is governed by the principle of falsificationism – claims of knowledge live or die by evidence
• Popper – discarding falsified knowledge is what enables scientific understanding of the world to grow
No theory is ever to be taken as definitely true e.g. for centuries it was believed to be true that the sun revolved around the earth until Copernicus showed that this was false
Popper - growth of science
- Merton – argues that science can only thrive as a major social institution if it receives support from other institutions and values
- This occurred in England as a result of the attitudes and values created by the Protestant reformation (especially Puritanism)
- Puritans’ industriousness and belief that the study of nature led to an appreciation of God’s works encouraged them to experiment
- Puritanism also stressed the importance of social welfare – attracted to the fact that science could produce technological inventions to improve the conditions of life
- New institution of science also received support from economic and military institutions as the value of the practical applications of science became obvious in areas such as mining, navigation and weaponry
CUDOS norms
- Communism – scientific knowledge is not private property (must be shared with scientific community or knowledge cannot grow)
- Universalism – the truth or falsity of scientific knowledge is judged by universal, objective criteria e.g. testing and without bias
- Disinterestedness – this means being committed to discovering knowledge for its own sake. Having to publish findings makes it harder for scientists to practice fraud since it enables others to check their claims
- Organised skepticism – no knowledge claim is regarded as ‘sacred’. Every idea is open to questioning, criticism and objective investigation.
Closed belief systems
- Scientific knowledge is provisional and open to challenge whereas religion claims to have special, perfect knowledge of the absolute truth (held on divine authority)
- Closed system – when fundamental beliefs are threatened, there are a number of ‘get – out clauses’ that reinforce the system from being disproved
Azunde witchcraft
• Don’t believe in coincidence or chance so when misfortune strikes they may explain it in terms of witchcraft e.g. someone, probably a jealous neighbor, is practicing witchcraft against me
- injured makes accusation
- potion given to chicken - if it dies, sufferer can publicly demand the witchcraft to stop
Azunde - Evans
belief system performs useful social functions (clears air and prevents grudges from festering, encourages neighbours to behave considerately towards each other to reduce the risk of an accusation, it also makes sure children keep their parents in line – witchcraft is hereditary
Self - sustaining beliefs
• Polanyi – all belief systems have three devices to sustain themselves in the face of apparently contradictory evidence
- Circulatory – each idea in the system is explained in terms of another idea within the system
- Subsidiary explanations – if the oracle fails, it may be explained away as due to the incorrect use of the benge
- Denial of legitimacy to rivals – system reject alternative worldviews by refusing to grant any legitimacy to their basic assumptions e.g. creationism rejects outright the evolutionists’ claim that the earth is billions of years old
Science as a closed system - Velikovsky
• Dr. Velikovsky – published ‘Worlds in Collision’ in which he put forward a new theory on the origins of the earth
• Theory challenged some of the most fundamental assumptions of sciences
• Response from scientific community – instead of putting the new theory to the tests, scientists rejected it immediately
• Boycott of his publisher was organized and scientists who called for a fair hearing were victimized, some even losing their jobs
•
Velikovsky - explanation
One explanation for this refusal comes from Kuhn – a mature science such as biology or geology is based on a paradigm (informs scientists what and how to study as well as what the answers should be)
• Most of the time, scientists are engaged in ‘puzzle – solving’ (scientist merely fills in details)
• Scientific education and training is a process of being socialized into faith into the truth of the paradigm
• Successful career depends on working within the paradigm
• Any scientist who challenges fundamental assumptions will be ridiculed
Sociology of scientific knowledge
- All knowledge – including scientific knowledge – is socially constructed
- Rather than being objective truth, it is created by social groups using the resources available to them
- Scientific facts are the product of shared theories or paradigms that tell them what they should expect to see
Knorr - Cetina
- Knorr – Cetina argues that the invention of new instruments e.g. microscopes permit scientists to make new observations to ‘fabricate’ new facts
- She points out that what scientists study in the laboratory is highly ‘constructed’ and far removed from the natural world
Little green men - Woolgar
- Woolgar – scientists are engaged in the same process of ‘making sense’ or interpreting the world as everyone else
- When confronted with ‘evidence’, they decide what it means by applying theories or explanations
- Discovery of pulsars by Cambridge astronomy laboratory in 1967 – scientists initially annotated the patterns as LGM (little green men)
- Recognized that this would be an unacceptable interpretation
- Eventually settled on an explanation, showing that a scientific fact is simply a social construction that scientists are able to persuade their colleagues to share
Marxism, feminism and postmodernism
- Serves the interest as serving the interests of dominant groups – men or ruling class
- Many advances in ‘pure’ science have been driven by the need of capitalism for certain types of knowledge e.g. on ballistics
- Biological ideas have been used to justify both male domination and colonial expansion – science can be seen as a form of ideology
- Postmodernists also reject knowledge claims of science as having the ‘truth’
- Lyotard – science is a meta narrative (science is merely a discourse – way of thinking used to dominate people)