relevant costs and revenues for decision making Flashcards
define relevant costs and revenues
‘those future costs and revenues that will be changed by a decision’
- cash flows
- incremental costs
- avoidable costs
therefore a relevant cost is: a future, incremental cash flow
what costs are NOT relevant?
- sunk costs
- committed costs
- unavoidable costs
- existing fixed costs
- depreciation
what are sunk costs?
a cost that has been incurred from a previous decision
what are committed costs?
costs that have not yet been incurred but will be incurred in the future due to previous decisions (also known as locked-in costs)
what are unavoidable costs?
the incurrence of these cannot be saved
long-run
- in the long-run the company needs to survive and therefore cover its long-run costs
- in the long-run most, if not all, costs are variable and therefore RELEVANT
- need a system in place that accurately reflects the costs of each product
short-term decision making
in the long-run we have to cover all costs but…
- in order to respond to short-term opportunities and threats we look at MARGINAL/VARIABLE costing principles and only look at the costs and revenues that will change as a result of the decision in question
what types of decisions do managers have to consider?
- special orders and selling price
- product mix
- replacement of equipment
- make or buy
- discontinuation
what is special order selling price?
outside the market - typically one-time-only orders which are sold BELOW the current price the company sells at !
what are the relevant costs/revenues when looking at special order selling price?
- it is the difference between the revenues, costs and profit which are relevant
- shows that there would be an increase/decrease in profit if you accept the special order
what do you need to be mindful of when looking at special order selling price?
there is an assumption that there are no long-run consequences of accepting this order:
- it is assumed that the future ‘normal’ selling price will not be affected by this contract (i.e. lower than ‘normal’ price)
- if this is an incorrect assumption then a company’s competitors ,ay reduce their prices forcing the company to reduce it’s ‘normal’ price resulting in lower profits
- it has also been assumed that there is no alternative use for the unused resources which may yield a greater contribution
- assumed fixed costs are unavoidable in the short-term
explain product mix
product mix decisions with capacity constraint..
- what happens when, in the short term, sales demand is in excess of our current production capacity?
- in this situation it is unlikely that we will be able to increase capacity
how do you work out which products to make?
NOT the one with the greater profit !!!!
- first find out what limits our ability to produce more i.e. we need to look for the limiting factor, e.g. if we do not have enough labour hrs to produce the demand, then that is the limiting factor
- why? profit is maximised when we get the greatest amount of contribution per limiting factor
what are the steps to calculate which product to make?
- work out how much labour/machine hrs are required to make the product (do this by looking at unit cost for labour and dividing it by how much is paid per hr)
- work out how much is demanded (do units demanded x hrs required)
- work out how much hrs are available
- see if it is a limiting factor = if there aren’t enough hrs to produce the product it is a limiting factor as it limits what we can do
- work out the same for labour/machine hrs (do the one you havent done) and check if it is limiting - USE THIS METHOD IF THERE IS ONLY ONE LIMITING FACTOR!
- identify relevant costs - costs that will change because of the decision (usually fixed costs can be ignored as they stay the same so would then need to find the contribution)
- work out the contribution from unit costs
- work out contribution per hour for each product and see which one has the highest (choose that product)
- then calculate how many to make: do this by looking at how many hrs are available using the limiting factor
- use up all the product with the highest cont. per hr and multiply by the hrs required to make product = gives us total hrs for the product
- subtract hrs available by total hrs for product with highest cont. per hr
- remaining hrs should be divided by the hrs required for other product which gives the amount of product to make for alternative product
- work out total contribution for each product and sum up (do this by doing amount of product x contribution for each product)
- can prove it makes higher contribution by calculating how much contribution it would have given us if we had chosen most profitable product
what does product mix calculation show us?
shows that the greatest profit comes from making the products in order of their highest contribution per limiting factor !!