reducing prejudice Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

name ways we can overcome STs.

A
  • we have lots of personal information about the person
  • we have the cognitive ability/ attentional capacity todo it
  • we have the motivation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define a motivated tactician.

A

a fully engaged thinker who as multiple cognitive strategies available and chooses among them based on motives, goals and needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

describe the conflictions of a motivated tactician.

A

sometimes motivated to choose wisely in the interests of adaptability and accuracy, sometimes they choose defensively in the interests of speed or self-esteem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

motivated tacticians encourage attribute-based processing through…

A
  • outcome dependency
  • accuracy
  • accountability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Devine stated that…

A

STs are automatic activations for all but some people can make conscious inhibitions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what happened once Devine added subliminal priming of Sts to her study?

A
  • those who had been primed with AA STs and with highly prejudice made more aggressive/ hostile interpretations of Donald.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

give evidence people can inhibit STs.

A

low prejudice people had more positive interpretations of ST groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is meant by prejudice with compunction?

A

belief that we should recognise and feel guilty about ST.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how can we break STs as bad habits?

A
  1. be aware of implicit biases
  2. be concerned about them
  3. learn to replace prejudice responses with non-prejudiced responses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

give evidence ST can be broken down.

A

before training, participants were mostly faster to ST faces consistent with ST words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define rebound effects.

A

when you suppress a thought…

  1. an intentional process drives thought from consciousness
  2. an automatic process monitors thoughts to check for the appearance of the unwanted thought.
    - monitoring has the paradoxical effect of activating the thought.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

describe findings form the white bear study.

A
  • students who had previously tried not to think about bears seemed to be overwhelmed by the thoughts of white bears = rebound effects.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what happened in the seat condition of the skinhead study?

A
  • those who had suppressed ST thoughts sat significantly further away than controls
    = rebound effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

rebound is less likely when…

A
  • motivated to reject ST

- social norms indicate ST are not acceptable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

name and describe the three possible steps to changing STs though disconfirming.

A

bookeeping - modification of ST in response to disconfirming information
conversion - radical change in response to dramatic disconfirmation
sub-typing - create subgroups in response to disconfirming info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

depending on … and … a specific type of ST changes will be applied.

A
dispersed = bookeeping
concentrated = sub-typing
17
Q

give evidence that sub-typing can be good or bad.

A

good - overall ST eventually disintegrate, perceive group as more variable, more thoughtful processing of inconsistent info.
bad - sub-typing allows more exceptions whilst preserving ST, insulation or even strengthening of ST, limits generalisation.

18
Q

define the contact hypothesis.

A

interaction between individuals belonging to different social groups will reduce ethnic prejudice and intergroup tension.

19
Q

what can change in order to reduce prejudice?

A
  • attitudes towards outgroup
  • perception of variability of outgroup
  • increased forgiveness
  • increased trust
  • decreased anxiety
  • emotion is critical in intergroup contact
20
Q

state Allport’s four factors to favourable outcomes.

A
  1. equal status
  2. pursuing common goods
  3. cooperatively
  4. backed by social and institutional support
21
Q

give evidence that working cooperatively reduces prejudice.

A

higher attitude ratings in cooperative group when working with an mentally ill person compared to when working alone.

22
Q

name Cooks additional factors to favourable outcomes.

A
  1. outgroup member should be disconfirm ST

6. high acquaintance potential

23
Q

name limitations of the original CH.

A
  • seen as overly specific and has lost explanatory power

- many conditions are facilitating than essential