reducing addiction: behavioural interventions Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

behavioural interventions definition

A

any treatment based on behaviourist principles of learning such as classical conditioning and operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

aversion therapy definition

A

behavioural treatment based on classical conditioning. a maladaptive behaviour is paired with an unpleasant stimulus such as a painful electric shock. eventually the behaviour is associated with pain without the shock being used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

covert sensitisation definition

A

a form of aversion therapy based on classical conditioning. A client imagines an unpleasant stimulus and associated this with a maladaptive behaviour (in contrast with aversion therapy where the unpleasant stimulus is actually experienced)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is aversion therapy

A

behavioural intervention based on classical conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the principle of aversion therapy

A

an addiction can develop through repeated associations between a substance/behaviour and the pleasurable state of arousal caused by it. therefore it follows that an addiction can be reduced by exploiting the same conditioning process, but by associating the substance/behaviour with an unpleasant state (counterconditioning)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how does aversion therapy work for alcohol addiction

A

used extensively in treating alcoholism. Client is given an aversive drug such as disulfiram which interferes with the normal bodily processes of metabolising alcohol into harmless chemicals, this means if someone drinks whilst taking disulfiram will experience severe nausea and vomiting (basically an instant hangover)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the aim of aversion therapy for alcohol addiction

A

for client to learn a new association. so in classical conditioning the disulfiram and alcohol separately do not produce nausea/vomiting together but they do. so through association, they become conditioned stimuli producing an expectation of nausea/vomiting which is the conditioned response. the client will soon expect to experience the conditioned response when they drink which is usually enough to prevent drinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what form of aversion therapy has been useful in behavioural addictions such as gambling addiction and those with medical conditions which could be worsened by vomiting

A

electric shock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

do the shocks used in aversion therapy for gambling cause damage

A

do not cause any permanent damage but are painful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how is aversion therapy for gamblers carried out

A

the addicted gambler thinks of phrases relate to their gambling behaviour and write them down on cards. some non-gambling related phrases are also included. the client then reads out each card. when they get to a gambling-repeated phrase they are given a two-second electric shock via a device attached to their wrist. The intensity and duration of the shock are preselected by the client (should be painful but not distressing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

why does electric shock aversion therapy for gambling work

A

after repeated pairings, the pain (unconditioned response) becomes associated with gambling-related behaviours (was the neutral stimulus, now the conditioned stimulus) the clients carvings subside and they stop gambling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is covert sensitisation based off

A

classical conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

does covert sensitisation occur in vitro or in vivo and why

A

in vitro as rather than actually experiencing the unpleasant stimulus the client imagines how it would feel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how is covert sensitisation carried out for smoking

A

-client encouraged to relax
-therapist reads from a script instructing client to imagine themselves in a an aversive situation
-client sees themselves smoking followed by imaging the unpleasant consequences, such as nausea and fear of vomiting
-the more vivid the image the better, so therapist goes into graphic detail about the elements of the imagery including sights, smeels, sounds and physical movements involved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

example of covert sensitiation for smoking

A

imagine smoking cigarettes covered in faeces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

example of an aversive stimulus chosen by client in covert sensitisation for gambling

A

-sometimes for added for unpleasantness McMurran reported user of slot machines with phobia of snakes. The imaginative scenario involved picturing a slot machine paying out snakes

17
Q

how does a covert sensitisation session end

A

clent imagining a scene where they turn their back on cigarettes and experiencing feelings of relief

18
Q

limitation of aversion therapy as a behavioural intervention for reducing addiction - methodological problems

A

-studies of aversion therapy have methodological problems
-hajek and Stead reviewed 55 studies of aversion therapy for nicotine addiction. they concluded it was impossible to judge effectiveness of aversion therapy as studies have obvious methodological problems . For example, failure to blind procedures so the researchers knew which participants had the placebo or recieved the therapy. this can influence researchers judgement of the therapy’s success –> therefore, research may tell us little about the value of aversion therapy

19
Q

limitation of aversion therapy as a behavioural intervention for reducing addiction - poor long-term effectiveness

A

-has a lack of long term benefits
-Fuller et al (1986) gave one group if participants with alcohol addiction disulfiram every day for one year, another group was given the placebo. both groups were given weekly counselling sessions for 6 months. there was no significant difference in total abstinence from drinking between these groups after one year –> suggests aversion therapy for alcohol addiction is no more effective than the placebo which could be because counselling has a bigger impact

20
Q

evaluation of aversion therapy as a behavioural intervention for reducing addiction - ethical issues

A

-unethical as uses punishment to treat addiction, this explains why drop out rates are so high. Aversion therapy also cases physical and psychological harm. it might be thought as an ethical treatment if it was effective
-on the other hand aversion therapy can be considered ethical. addiction to drugs and gambling itself is potentially dangerous to physical and psychological health whereas aversion therapy isn’t as much. self-selected electric shocks may be painful but it is not life threatening. therefore is not unethical to use aversion therapy

21
Q

strength of covert sensitisation as a behavioural intervention for reducing addiction - research support

A

-research support for covert sensitisation
-McConaghy et al (1983) compared covert sensitisation to electric shock aversion therapy for gambling addiction. after a year those with covert sensitisation were significantly more likely to have reduced gambling(90% compared to 30%). they also reported experiencing fewer and less intense gambling carvings –> suggests covert sensitisation is a highly promising behavioural intervention

22
Q

limitation of covert sensitisation as a behavioural intervention for reducing addiction - methodological criticism

A

-many studies of covert sensitisation including McConaghy et al do not include a suitable comparison group
-for example, research studies often omit non-behavioural therapies as a comparison group and instead just compare covert sensitisation to aversion therapy. addiction has many non-learning causes such as cognitive factors. non behavioural therapies such as CBT address this whereas neither covert sensitisation of aversion therapy do –> means benefits of covert sensitisation may be exaggerated

23
Q

evaluation of covert sensitisation as a behavioural intervention for reducing addiction - symptom substitution

A

-covert sensitisation only suppresses addiction, it is not a cure. people undergoing covert sensitisation may appear to recover but the issues that caused the addiction remain and then new symptoms appear which is called symptom substitution
-however, the point is to change behaviour and the behaviour is the addiction. if symptoms arise to replace the ones that have disappeared then covert sensitisation could be used to treat those as well