Reconstructive Memory - Bartlett 1932 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What idea do the MSM, WMM, and Tulving’s ideas of semantic and episodic memory work with?

A

The idea of memory being about separate stores and brain function working in separate stores, some temporary and other long-term.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How are Bartlet’s ideas about memory different to the ideas of the other models?

A

His ideas are about memory being a reconstruction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are memories a reconstruction of?

A

Of previous knowledge and memories (schemas).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bartlett’s idea is that memories are…

A

… a combination of specific traces encoded at the time of the event, along with our knowledge, expectations, beliefs and experiences of such an event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the reconstructive model of memory highlight?

A

How recall is affected by previous experiences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is reconstructive memory?

A

The theory that memories aren’t exact copies of what is encoded and stored. Rather, they are affected by prior experience and knowledge in the form of schemas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are schemas?

A

Cognitive plans/ scripts that are built up using experiences about everyday life. They affect the processing of information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bartlett said that memory is not like…

A

… a tape recorder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does it mean that memory isn’t like a tape recorder?

A

It doesn’t record EVERYTHING.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Loftus & Mackworth’s study shows that people look at unexpected items in a scene more than at expected items. What do they conclude from this?

A

That having prior knowledge and schemas about scenes can free up cognitive processing capacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is it useful that cognitive processing capacity can be freed up?

A

Because the capacity can then be allocated to what is inconsistent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A memory is not perfectly?

A

Formed, encoded and retrieved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

It is unlikely that a memory is retrieved exactly as…

A

… it was originally perceived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bartlett thought that the past and current experiences of individuals would?

A

Affect their memory of events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Remembering involves the retrieval of?

A

Knowledge that has been altered to fit with knowledge that the person already has.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bartlett used the idea of ‘Chinese Whispers’ when he thought about?

A

Memory being reconstructive.

17
Q

Why did Bartlett link the idea of memory to ‘Chinese Whispers’?

A

Because the story is ‘reconstructed’ - it becomes changed along the way, often so that it makes sense to the person telling it, and the final retelling can be completely different from the original.

18
Q

‘War of the Ghosts’ is?

A

A native American folk story.

19
Q

Why didn’t ‘War of the Ghosts’ fit in well with the participants’ existing schemas?

A

Because it was unfamiliar to them and came from a different culture.

20
Q

What was the overall procedure of the experiment?

A
  • each participant read through the story twie
  • asked to recall the story 15 minutes later
  • further recalls followed
21
Q

What did results show?

A
  • changes that began in the first reproduction became more pronounced over time
  • story gradually became more concise & coherent
  • there was elaboration on the story
22
Q

When there are fairly fixed repetitions over time…

A

… the story becomes rather fixed and doesn’t change much.

23
Q

One participant recalled the story 2 & 1/2 years after having first read it.
What was found?

A
  • it was much shorter
  • only the bare outline remained
  • rationalisation
  • confabulation
24
Q

What is rationalisation?

A

Making things make more sense.

25
Q

What is confabulation?

A

Making up bits to fill in a memory so that it makes sense.

26
Q

As part of the reconstruction of the story, there was conformity with?

A

Common ideas, for e.g. that people die at sunset, even though in the story the person died as the sun rose.

27
Q

After 6 recalls, the story was reduced from…

A

… 330 words to 180.

28
Q

Summarise what was found regarding rationalisation and confabulation.

A

Bartlett found that people rationalised the parts that didn’t make sense, and they filled in their memories so that they were recalling what was, to them, a sensible story.

29
Q

Participants recontructed their memories of the story.

What did Bartlett conclude about memory from these findings?

A

He concluded that memory is reconstructive, rather than reproductive.

30
Q

Style & rhythm of the story were?

A

Kept the same

31
Q

What happens when reproduction is frequent?

A

Details become stereotyped, after which there is little change.

32
Q

What happens with less frequent reproduction?

A

Details are missed out, there is simplification of events, and items are transformed into something more familiar.

33
Q

With long-term remembering, the general setting remains & people remember details that stood out for them.
What does this show?

A

That memory is constructed and there is inference.