Reasoning & Problem Solving Flashcards
5 Contrasts Between Early and Middle Childhood
- Appearance vs Reality
- Centration vs Decantation
- States vs Transformations
- Irreversibility vs Reversibility
- Qualitative vs Quantitative
Why do younger children fail and older children pass the appearance vs reality task? Example of an appearance vs reality task?
Younger children: Appearance of more liquid in one vessel
Older children: Appearance of more liquid & interference based on underlying reality. Older children can override appearance.
Conservation of liquid is an example
In regards to centration vs decentration, what can both older and younger children do? What can only older children do?
Both can access the perceptual information of the transformations
Older children can mover beyond perceptual to conceptual. Can reason about more than physical properties
What’s an example of a states and transformations task?
What is the difference between younger and older children?
Conservation of liquid- 2 states (initial & final)
Younger children focus on states
Older children can represent initial and final states and reflect on the transformation
What can older children do that younger children cannot do, when referring to irreversibility and reversibility?
Older children can understand that many entities and actions have opposite states. Younger children have irreversible thought.
What is the contrast of younger children and older children in quantitative and qualitative problem solving?
Younger children use global assessments of a qualitative nature-use guesstimates
Older children can quantify and conduct operations
3 contrasts between middle childhood and adolescence
- Real vs Possible
- Empirico-Inductive vs Hypothetico-deductive
- Intrapropositional vs Interpropositional
Contrasts: real vs possible
Child (concrete operational): reality, dives right in, trial-and-error approach to finding solutions, methodical
Adolescent (formal operations): possibility, deeper examination at the outset, methodical
Contrasts: empirics-inductive vs hypothetico-deductive
Child: empirico-inductive, concrete, non-speculative
Adolescent: hypothetico-deductive, creates hypothesis, revises approach if needed
Contrasts: Intrapropositional vs Interpropositional
Children: consider one case, factual
Adolescent: considers relations among cases, logical
Reasoning- Other Perspectives
- Similarity-based reasoning
- Analogical Reasoning
- Causal Reasoning
Metacognitive awareness
Think about theories instead of just with theories
The _______ phase and the _______ phase are part of the process of inferential thinking
Investigative, inferential
______ ______ = more scientific thinking
Better thinking
- Goal directed cognitive ability
- Different approaches (general, specific)
- Engage in for fun & out of necessity
Problem Solving