Realism and Liberalism as the 'Natural' Starting Points of Analysis Flashcards

1
Q

What differences do Liberals and Realists have in their views on how to achieve security?

A

Liberals believe that security is best achieved through cooperation and alliance between states, whereas realists favour accruing more power and influence to secure one’s own state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain Angell’s ideas on economic interdependence and what this was intended to achieve

A

Angell’s ‘The Great Illusion’ championed economic interdependence as a way to create peace and cooperation between states. Trade and economic links between states mean that they will not want to jeopardise this through war.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What perspective did EH Carr have on international law from his Realist viewpoint?

A

Carr believed that international law was the field of the haves, imposing this on the have nots.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the key focuses/values of Realism?

A

Realism focuses on power politics and the balance of power. It does not value morality, taking a negative view of human nature, believing states act in the interests of securing greater power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do Realists see that war can be controlled/limited?

A

Realists believe war can either be limited through the achieving of a balancing of power and the creation of an equilibrium. It can also be limited through prudence, whereby it is deemed that war would not be beneficial to achieving aims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are Morgenthau’s principles of political Realism?

A

1 - politics being governed by laws grounded in human nature
2 - politics based on power
3 - power takes many different forms
4 - states act based on the ‘moral principle of survival’
5 - morals not universal across states
6 - politics is self-governing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does Neorealism attempt to better understand events than Realism does?

A

Neorealism focuses more so on contextual understandings than Realism does, believing this to be essential for a proper understanding that theoretical lenses cannot achieve.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Kenneth Waltz see the role of IR theories being? What were these not intended to do?

A

Waltz saw IR theory as intended to explain events, rather than to predict. They should take the world as it is and work with that, rather than predicting how the world could be.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the key assumptions of Neorealism about states?

A

Neorealism believes that all states are the same as units in the international system, yet that greater powers can exert more influence over the anarchic international system. States actions are uncertain but guided by rationality. THEY ACT IN ORDER TO SURVIVE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is democratic peace theory?

A

Democratic peace theory revolves around the idea that 2 democracies will not go to war with each other, hence the more democracies there are will mean a diminishing in the threat of war.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Neoliberalism based around?

A

Neoliberalism focuses on international organisations, cooperation, economic interdependence, democracy and democratic peace.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What 3 developments can be said to have led to the world becoming less anarchic in nature?

A

Interdependence - increases cost of war, reduces likelihood
Liberal institutionalism - provides more structure to international society, loose rules and laws constrain behaviour
Hegemony - previously US hegemony over intl order shapes its culture and values without conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How has the hegemony of the US collapsed somewhat to increase the extent to which the world is anarchic?

A

The US has become less hegemonic over global affairs since the height of this in the 1990s and 2000s, challenged by China and, to a lesser extent, Russia. That the US no longer dictates global affairs means that there is not a higher power overseeing and guiding events, contributing to a sense of anarchy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What disagreements do Realists and Liberals have over the units of analysis in IR?

A

Realists see states as the only relevant and important unit of analysis in IR, believing these sovereign and independent bodies take most decisions. Liberals, however, see institutions as having their own power that is important to assess alongside that of states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can the values of Liberalism be seen as Neo-imperialist?

A

Liberal values of capitalism, institutionalism democracy are not accepted or adopted across cultures, particularly in the non-Western world. As such, these values being accepted by the dominant powers in IR has led to allegations of them being imposed across the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can the ambitions and values of Liberalism be seen as ineffective?

A

Liberalism prides itself upon democracy leading to a reduction in conflict, yet prominent democracies still exist as warmongering states (see US and WoT). The liberal financial order further instils inequality internationally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How can the ideas of Realism be seen to be ineffective or actively damaging?

A

Realism endorses imperialist logic, allowing states to invade and conquer in search of power. It also favours the status quo, allowing what currently occurs in the international system to continue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explain Angell’s, Bloch’s and Kelsen’s competing ideas within Liberalism on what would limit the possibility of war occurring?

A

Angell believed that economic development and integration would make war too EXPENSIVE and thus undesirable. Bloch believed that technological advancement would make war too DANGEROUS. Kelsen believed that intl. laws would make wars unlikely through the development of institutions and legal norms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What shared assumptions do Neoliberals and Neorealists make about the international system and the states in it?

A

Both Neorealists and Neoliberals believe anarchy to be present in the international sphere, with states competing for survival within this. They both also see power as a key variable.

19
Q

What differences are there between the assumptions that Neorealists and Neoliberal make about the international system? (Institutions, gains, cooperation)

A

Neorealists believe international institutions have little role, with states taking primacy. Neoliberals instead value institutions. Furthermore, there is a difference over the value of cooperation, as Neorealists believe states must seek relative gains over others through battles over power, whereas Neoliberals look for absolute gains through cooperation across a range of metrics other than power.

20
Q

What is the key difference between Realists and Neorealists in terms of what they see as impacting states’ actions?

A

Realists believe that human nature is the main factor influencing states’ behaviour, whereas Neorealists believe that international anarchy and the structure of the international system is the main factor influencing states’ behaviour.

21
Q

What important role does uncertainty play for Realists? How does this differ for offensive and defensive Realists?

A

Realists believe states cannot be sure of other states’ actions (based around a negative view of human nature), leading them either to maximise their power and influence (offensive) or to maximise their own security through defensive means (defensive)

22
Q

Explain Robert Jervis’ concept of the security dilemma. How does uncertainty influence these?

A

Security dilemmas are what occurs when 2 rivals are unsure of each others’ behaviours. One state increases its offensive capabilities, leading the other to do the same to feel secure, and this continues until the situation either relaxes, or it spills over into conflict.

23
Q

Explain Levy’s idea of the balance of power

A

In the idea of ‘power balancing’, when one state or group of states’ power increases, another individual state or group of states will also aim to increase its power to match this in order to avert conflict. EVERYTHING THROUGH POWER!!!

24
Q

Explain Mearsheimer’s view of Offensive Realism and how this differs from Waltz’s Defensive Realism

A

Mearsheimer - Offensive Realism whereby states will seek to become a regional hegemon, expanding power through aggressive means to ensure security.
Waltz - Defensive Realism whereby states’ main intention is SURVIVAL in the international system of anarchy. Defend themselves.

25
Q

Explain the main ideas of Neoclassical Realism (in terms of what guides a state’s actions)

A

Neoclassical Realism believes that internal situation of a state is crucial - rather than international structures being solely responsible. Also sees role of the state’s internal bureaucracy and diplomatic actors

26
Q

How does Yan Xuetong seek to use Realism to explain present day relations between the US and China?

A

Realism can explain relations between the US and China as each side is arguably hegemony seeking, wishes to be secure against threats from the other and is involved in a game of power balancing.

27
Q

How can the idea of a security dilemma potentially be applied to the US and China?

A

The building up of security capabilities based on mistrust (key element of realism) can create a conflict - potential for this to occur between US and China if current confrontation continues to escalate.

28
Q

How can Neoclassical Realism be used to explain Russia’s invasion of Ukraine?

A

Neoclassical Realism can explain Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as domestic and ideational factors playing key role in its actions in the international community, as the desire to reunite the former ‘Soviet Union’ key in creating a ‘Greater Russia’

29
Q

Use the League of Nations to explain Liberal Institutionalism… why did this fail? USE ARGUMENTS ABOUT SHARED NORMS AND COLLECTIVES

A

The League of Nations was intended to create international authority and collective security between states, the brainchild of Woodrow Wilson. This failed under the pressures created by the Abyssinian Crisis of 1935, the Manchurian Crisis of 1931 and the Rhineland Remilitarisation, with states seeing this alliance as no longer mutually beneficial, hence it collapsing.

30
Q

Explain the US’s self-identification of the ‘Indispensable Nation’. How did this influence US FP in the late 90s and early 2000s? Is this view still intact now?

A

The idea of the ‘Indispensable Nation’ is one built on US exceptionalism, whereby the US can use whatever force it wishes due to its standing and influence. This influenced highly interventionist US policies of the Clinton and Bush administrations in Europe and the Middle East, yet has somewhat elapsed now, with the Republican Party driving this in Congress by blocking funding for foreign conflicts. Part of the ‘America First’ doctrine!

31
Q

Explain Kant’s ideas of a ‘federal contract’ between states to prevent wars

A

Kant viewed the optimum way of preventing wars as being through a ‘federal contract’ between states. This would forbid the use of war to resolve disputes, yet stops short of global governance.

32
Q

How is the idea of liberal internationalism challenged today through the decline of US hegemony and the failure of ‘liberal FP’ in the early 2000s?

A

Liberal internationalism as the dominant FP paradigm is being challenged as the US’s hegemony weakens, with this having been what sustained much of the rules-based international order. In the absence of this, we are sliding into a post-liberal world. Furthermore, Sorensen argues that the legacy of the War on Terror and Bush Doctrine has tarnished the whole basis for liberal internationalism.

33
Q

What issues are there of liberal institutionalist ideals resembling Neocolonialism? Link to the pronouncements of Michael Ignatieff and Robert Cooper

A

Liberal institutionalism has been seen as resembling neocolonialism through its insistence on the right to overcome state sovereignty through R2P, as well as through the intense involvement of institutions within developing states. Liberal ideas have also been seen to promote a new colonial settlement to resolve issues in former colonies - proposed by Ignatieff and Cooper!

34
Q

How can institutions fall short of expectations according to Lebow? What ceases for this to happen? Give examples

A

Lebow argues that institutions and pacts can be sustained, but only so long as their participants desire this! There must be effort for cooperation and a feeling that they are still beneficial. This occurred with the Eastern Bloc in the Cold War, which rapidly collapsed as it outlived its use for its participants, as did the LoN when it was seen not to be serving the interests of Japan, Germany and Italy.

35
Q

Explain the Hobbesian state of nature. How does this link to Realist assumptions and aims?

A

Hobbes saw the ‘state of nature’ being a war of all against all, requiring a strong Leviathan is needed to avert war and create peace. War emerges through humans being disposed towards fighting following the uncertainty of states’ action AMID ANARCHY. This war is undertaken to achieve material advantage and increase security.

36
Q

How does the Hobbesian state of nature link to the conditions of International Relations?

A

The Hobbesian State of Nature, based around anarchy and material advantage to create security from constant war, is able to be averted domestically by strong government, YET IS UNAVOIDABLE amid anarchy at the international level!

37
Q

Explain the ethos of survival for states

A

Survival is not merely existential, but ETHICAL (Odysseos): states exist to ensure the survival of those that submit their liberties to them. The responsible action by a state is to secure their own people’s survival without consideration for others that exist outside the state.

38
Q

How do Mearsheimer’s and Robert Keohane’s views on institutions vary?

A

Mearsheimer does not value international institutions - he does not believe states can cooperate to produce mutually beneficial outcomes, instead they seek relative gains. Keohane, rather, believes that when states recognise that they can mutually benefit from cooperation, they will form institutions to do so.

39
Q

Why does Keohane not believe that institutions are ALWAYS successful?

A

Keohane values institutions, but not to the point where he believes they are always influential and positive. Their impact is dependent upon the realities around them and the situations they find themselves in. When there is confidence in them from both sides they are effective, but if the reality does not support this, then they will be ineffective.

40
Q

How does a Realist perspective on cooperation differ from Keohane’s viewpoint on cooperation?

A

Realists believe that cooperation will only occur to avert war or boost security. However, Keohane believes that cooperation can work across different fields and when mutual benefit is achievable.

41
Q

Does Keohane see the role of institutions and cooperative bodies in IR being to constrain or to empower?

A

Keohane believes institutions are significant because they have the ability to empower their members and participants, rather than them constraining them.

42
Q

What are the main differences between Realism and Neorealism?

A

Realism places most emphasis on human nature as the reason for conflict, whereas Neorealists believe this is due to anarchical society. Furthermore, Realism sees more agency for states than Neorealism (due to the fact that Neorealism believes the international structure constrains), while Neorealism is more positivist as a perspective than Realism.

43
Q

Explain John Mearsheimer’s views on the causes of the Russia-Ukraine conflict

A

Mearsheimer argues that Russia’s actions against Ukraine are defensive, owing to NATO’s supposed provocation and advancement to Russia’s borders. In light of this, Russia had to invade Ukraine to expand its power and security (Offensive Realism).

44
Q

How is Musk significant as a non-state actor through Starlink?

A

Musk refused to extend Starlink satellites into Crimea to replace damaged internet coverage there. This would have aided Ukrainian military operations in the region, yet Musk declined to extend its use.