Reading 3.1 Shackleton Flashcards
Hypothesis 1 of the study:
To test whether resources had contrasting benefits of quality and quantity
Hypothesis was achieved by:
- By comparing the foraging performance of honeybees on fallen P. guajava fruits versus two species of wild flowers growing nearby
Study methods 1
First, we measured the rate of weight change of bees foraging on each resource to test the prediction that fruit foragers would gain weight faster than flower foragers.
Study methods 2
Second, we measured the energetic quality of each resource in terms of its sugar content, to confirm that guava juice was more dilute than the nectar alternatives.
Study methods 3
Third, we quantified the activity patterns of bees on each resource, to test the prediction that fruit foragers spend more time handling and less time on the energetically expensive activity of flying between food items.
When was the study carried out?
Brazil, February - March 2015
What were the opposing food sources in the experiment?
- Food sources were fruit from fallen guava trees, and two wild flower species grown in patches
What factors did the experiment investigate? (6)
- Investigated weight gain, forage quality, time and activity budget of foragers, effect of temperature, resource quality and pattern of daytime resource use
Where was weight gain most apparent?
On the guava fruit (16-22 factors greater)
Was there differences in the gain of bees in the wildflower condition?
No
What had the worst forage quality?
Guava fruit
What had the least travel time between food items?
Guava fruit
Bees foraging on higher quality resources were more likely to return with a lower…?
Weight of resource
What time of day did foraging peak?
Morning
What food source enabled all day foraging?
Guava fruit - wildflowers were not fed on all day