L12 Flashcards

1
Q

Examples of species that co-operatively breed:

A

-Meerkats

  • Social insects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is co-operative breeding characterized by?

A
  • The presence of helpers
  • Eg cleaning, mutualistic feeding
  • Individuals who help hamper their own reproductive success
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Diversity of cooperative systems

A
  • Cooperative breeding has different interpretations
    • Most widespread in birds 4-9% of bird species
    • 3% of mammal species
    • Described in >10 fish species
    • Social insects that aren’t yet eusocial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In what species is cooperative breeding most widespread?

A

Birds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Helpers at the nest e.g. Florida Scrub Jay

A
  • Florida scrub Jay
    • Pair + 1.8 helpers
    • Helpers feed and protect young from predators
    • Helpers usually related to breeding pair
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Helpers at the nest eg Silver backed Jackal

A
  • Pair + 1-3 helpers
  • Helpers regurgitate food to pups and lactating female
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Helpers at the nest eg Naked mole rat

A
  • Naked mole rat
    • Larger societies up to 80 individuals
    • Queen breeds
    • Normal moles have different morphology to queen
    • Reproductive division of labour (some fight, some forage, reproductive female breeds in chamber)
    • Dispersal morphs who try and founder new colonies
    • Debated whether it is a caste system or part of species aging
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Plural breeders

A

Several males and females share a nest and raise a communal brood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Banded mongoose

A

-Plural breeders

- 4-40 individuals in a group

- Several reproductive females and males
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Acorn woodpecker

A
  • Plural breeding
    • 2-14 individuals in a group
    • Reproductive individuals are often brothers and sisters
    • These breed with individuals that have moved into the colony
    • Helpers are non-breeding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ecological constraints hypothesis

A

Independent breeding is constrained - thus leading to grown offspring delay dispersal and stay at home
1. Habitat saturation/ ecological constraints

Grown offspring delay dispersal and stay at home leads to grown offspring helping to rear later broods

  1. Fitness benefits of helping exceed those of not helping
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Main assumption of the evolutionary constraints hypothesis

A

there is a better fitness return from breeding than helping (but breeding is constrained)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Species Example eg Long-tailed tit

A

Genetic equivalents = fitness

Breeding productivity = 0.5 GE
Helping = 0.14 GE

Hypothesis: constraints cause offspring to delay dispersal instead of breeding independently

Correlational evidence

- Bad years =  more helping

- Good years = less helping
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Acorn woodpecker

A
  • In nearly all bad years (low acorn crop) there is high delayed dispersal
    • In good years (high acorn crop) there is less delayed dispersal

> 2Y acorn woodpeckers

- Less delayed dispersal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Superb fairy wren

A
  • 60% of pairs have male helpers
    • Arise due to male sex ratio
    • Sex ratio at birth is 1:1 but many females die so it is 1.8M: 1F
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Are fairy wren helpers constrained from breeding experiment 1?

A

Male removed from pair

Leaving 33 vacancies for 33 helpers

31/33 vacancies filled by helpers (within 5 hours)

17
Q

Are fairy wren helpers constrained from breeding experiment 2?

A
  • Removed male and female
    • Empty territories
    • Initially helpers didn’t take over territory as there was no reason (no one to mate with)
    • Female released (after 3 days) then 7/7 vacancies filled
    • No interest in helping, strictly reproducing
18
Q

Are fairy wren helpers constrained from breeding conclusions

A
  • Helpers are capable of reproduction
    • Habitat is limiting (ECH)
      • mates are limiting
19
Q

Experimental work has revealed different constraints such as…?

A
  • Food
  • Nest cavities
  • Territory and mate
  • High quality territory (food)
20
Q

How do helpers benefit from helping?

A

Direct fitness: fitness gained from personal reproduction

and

Indirect fitness: fitness gained from increasing production of non-descendant kin ( via kin selection)

21
Q

The three direct fitness benefits:

A
  • Increased survival
  • Increased probability of future breeding
  • Direct reproduction
22
Q

Group augmentation hypothesis

A

Benefits may select for helpers to then keep adding to benefits

23
Q

Increased survival

A
  • Group augmentation hypothesis

Producing extra offspring benefits helpers by increasing group size

Kidnapping in banded mongoose and white-winged chough

Gaining benefits associated with larger group living

- Some cons of group living but benefits must outweigh for it to occur
24
Q

Experimental evidence for increased survival

A
  • Cichlid groups more likely to accept immigrants when predation risk is high
25
Q

Increased probability of future breeding

A

Territory inheritance

48% of helpers eventually acquire all or part of parental territory so they can become breeders

Mate acquisition

- Pied kingfishers

Primary helpers

- Relatives

Secondary helpers

- Not relatives
- Don’t benefit indirectly but buy their way into a territory and inherit female when the male dies

Kick out breeding male sometimes

26
Q

Increased experience (skills hypothesis)

A
  • Comparison of success of various breeders eg 1st time, previous breeders
    • 1st time breeders who never helped had no/ low reproductive success
    • 1st time breeders who helped had more reproductive success as did previous breeders
27
Q

Direct reproduction

A
  • 44% lay eggs in helped nest
    • 15% of all young produced by ‘helpers’
    • Helpers are usually female
    • Helpers taking advantage of producing their own offspring
    • Not strictly helpers
28
Q

Indirect fitness benefits

A
  • Increased reproductive success of relatives
  • Increased survival of related breeders
29
Q

Increased reproductive success of relatives

A
  • Long-tailed tit
    • Reproductive success increases with no of helpers
    • Raised by offspring alone reduces survival chance
    • If helpers Is related there is a large indirect payoff

White fronted bee-eater

- Reproductive success increases with no of helpers

- However these correlation studies may be a result of more individuals in group size, more experienced parents etc
30
Q

Does removal of helpers impact reproductive success?

A

Removal experiments

- Socially disruptive

- No sig effect on all species, but some species there is an effect
31
Q

Increased survival of related breeders

A

= load-lightening

- Investing more in reproduction means less in self- maintenance

- Helpers can assist with costs

Hatchwell 1999

- 20/26 species of cooperative breeder

- One or both parents reduce their effort when assisted by helpers

-  improved parental survival hard to demonstrate

Helpers are typically related to breeders