Quiz 8 Flashcards
Validity
Refers to the authenticity of the results of a study
Internal validity
Results are directly related to the intervention . A study has internal validity when the experimental results are directly related to the intervention/treatment used in the study rather than a confounding variable.
Confounding variable
Is one that the researcher is unaware is having an influence on the study;as such, it is not measured or observed.
Quasi- experimental vs experimental
Similarities:
- Control Group
- An intervention
Differences:
-quasi-experimental design does not use probability sampling methods and does not randomly assign study participants to an experiment or control group (lower degree of external validity)
external validity
results can be generalizable to a larger population.
Experimental research- The terms treatment and intervention can be used interchangeably in medical research
-When the researcher is doing medical research (testing medical treatment plan, testing a new drug treatment, testing a new research device, etc) the researcher will use the words intervention and treatment interchangeably.
-Treatment example
clinical studies of drugs, clinical medical treatments, Testing a new drug, device, medical treatment plan
-Intervention
If the researcher is testing a complex program that has been designed to change health behaviors, attitudes, or environmental and social conditions that impact health outcomes. ex. such as programs designed to change behaviors, attitudes, etc., the term intervention is used
Experimental research- Manipulation of Variables
Independent is purposely changed by the researcher (i.e., treatment, new intervention) to test the effect on the dependent.
Experimental research-Control
- Used to prevent outside variables from influencing the outcome of the study.
- The experimental and control group are equivalent with the exception that the experimental group gets the intervention or treatment; the control group does not.
Experimental research- Random Sample
A random sample uses of one of the probability sampling methods.
-A random sample is thought to be composed of participants that are representative of the population at large
Experimental research- Random Assignment
Participants in the random sample have an equal chance of being assigned to the experimental or control group
Research Notations
Are a shorthand used by researchers to illustrate a specific research design.
-Developed by Campbell and Stanley
-O = an observation (dependent variable); O is the outcome of the influence of the independent variable (X)
-R = indicates participants have been randomly assigned to the experimental or control group
-G = indicates that participants have bee grouped in a non-random way
-X = the treatment or intervention (independent variable) the experimental group is exposed to
*The effects of the treatment or intervention are
measured
* The control group is NOT exposed to the
treatment or intervention
Time: the left to right dimension sequential order of procedures in the experiment
Subscripts: Subscript numbers show difference. When the number follows the R, it shows that there are 2 groups. When the number follows the O, it shows that the study has several different observations (data collection points)
Experimental Designs: Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design
-controls for many threats to internal validity
-Two groups, randomly sampled and randomly assigned to experimental (R1) or control (R2) group
-Random assignment to experimental or control group increases interval validity of the study
-Group R1 receives a treatment or intervention; Group R2 does not
-Both groups receive an observation at the same time prior to and after the intervention (for the experimental group)
Because the groups were randomly sampled and randomly assigned, any differences in the posttest results should be due to the intervention and not any differences between the two groups
A possible threat to the external validity of this design is the pretest effect
process of observing or assessing people before administering the experimental treatment (pretest) may influence how people respond to the treatment; possible threat to the external validity of this design is the pretest effect
Experimental Designs: Posttest-Only Control Group
- sometimes you can not pretest
- May not be able to find a suitable pretest
- May be studying a life event in which it wasn’t possible to pretest individuals before the event
-controls for threats to internal validity
Example: study effectiveness of an intervention for PTSD following a hurricane
Random selection of participants from a community that had recently experienced a hurricane and experienced PTSD; random selection to experimental and control groups
X = PTSD intervention
Experimental Designs: Soloman Four-Group Design
This design has the highest level of controls for threats to internal validity by controlling for pretest effects. Combines the pretest-posttest design with the posttest only design. (pg145)
Allows the researcher to determine if the results are valid-meaning, has the study been influenced by pretesting
ex: Consider the following narrative description of the scientific notation. A researcher is interested in studying the effect of computer assisted cognitive training on memory loss in a population of adults, between the ages of 50 and 60. Participants are randomly selected and then randomly assigned to groups R1, R2, R3 and R4. The table below depicts the observations (memory tests) and treatments (computer assisted cognitive training) received by each group.
- Controls for many threats to internal validity
- Examples of threats to internal validity: history and maturation (has a control group); comparison of R2 and R4 control for pre-test effects
History: an outside event occurred during the research study that can impact the results of the study
Control for this threat: select a research design that includes a control group
Maturation: time passed and the participants grew “older, wiser, stronger, or more experienced
Control for this threat: select a research design that includes a control group
if the researcher wanted to add another layer of control to the study internal validity, a placebo could be added
Experimental Design: Within-Subjects Design (Repeated measures design)
The subjects participating in the research are exposed to each intervention, otherwise known as the independent variable. Each subjects performance is repeatedly measured.
The strength of this design: Does not require a large number of study participants, as the same participants receive multiple interventions. Use of one group helps control for the internal threats to validity of history and maturation. Subjects serve as their own control for individual differences between subjects.
Weaknesses: Carry-over effect, fatigue, and practice effects.
Carry-over effect: exposure to 1 intervention impacts the performance of study participants for the next intervention.
Practice effect- an improvement in one’s performance on a test due to repeated exposure to the same test materials
This design can also fall under quasi-experimental study designs if non-probability sampling is used to obtain the participants for the study.